Article (Scientific journals)
Limited clinical utility of a self-evaluating risk assessment scale for postmenopausal osteoporosis: lack of predictive value of lifestyle-related factors
Goemaere, S; Zegels, Brigitte; Toye, K et al.
1999In Calcified Tissue International, 65 (5), p. 354-358
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Limited clinical utility of a self-evaluating risk assessment scale for postmenopausal osteoporosis lack of predictive value of lifestyle-related factors.pdf
Publisher postprint (129.84 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Absorptiometry, Photon; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analysis of Variance; Body Weight; Bone Density/physiology; Bone and Bones/metabolism; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Life Style; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/diagnosis/prevention & control; Questionnaires; Regression Analysis; Risk Factors
Abstract :
[en] The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of a self-administered questionnaire to identify subjects with postmenopausal osteoporosis in the setting of first line medical care. A sample of 300 postmenopausal women completed the questionnaire based on 18 items. Bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (BMD-L), total hip (BMD-H), and femoral neck (BMD-N) was used as objective criterion for evaluation. The mean risk score was 8.2 +/- 3.21. BMD was correlated with total risk score: r = -0.32 for BMD-L, -0.36 for BMD-N, and -0.43 for BMD-H. Cutoff points for the risk score (equal likelihood points) according to a T-score threshold of -2.5 were 8.6 for BMD-L and BMD-N and 9.3 for BMD-H; specificity and sensitivity was 62% and 62%, respectively, for BMD-L, 65% and 62% for BMD-N, and 75% and 63% for BMD-H. Stepwise multiple regression analysis of the questionnaire items in relation to BMD showed higher correlation coefficients for models including individual items rather than the overall risk score. Items concerning low weight, older age, and wrist fracture after 50 years of age were always selected as significant determinants of BMD (R = 0.43-0.55). Hormonal replacement therapy was also an important determinant. Lifestyle-related items did not contribute significantly. In conclusion, the diagnostic performance of the 18-item self-administered questionnaire was poorer than a shortened questionnaire omitting lifestyle factors. The clinical utility of a questionnaire should ultimately be evaluated in the specific optic of a chosen global strategy for prevention of osteoporotic fractures.
Disciplines :
General & internal medicine
Author, co-author :
Goemaere, S
Zegels, Brigitte ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Toye, K
CREMERS, Simon ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Cardiologie
Demuynck, R
Daems, M
Dobbelaere, K
Ben Sedrine, Wafa ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Albert, Adelin  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Informatique médicale et biostatistique
Dewé, Walthère ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Médecine générale
Kaufman, JM
Reginster, Jean-Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Language :
English
Title :
Limited clinical utility of a self-evaluating risk assessment scale for postmenopausal osteoporosis: lack of predictive value of lifestyle-related factors
Publication date :
1999
Journal title :
Calcified Tissue International
ISSN :
0171-967X
eISSN :
1432-0827
Publisher :
Springer, New York, United States - New York
Volume :
65
Issue :
5
Pages :
354-358
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 20 September 2012

Statistics


Number of views
79 (10 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
1 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
16
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
15
OpenCitations
 
10

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi