Request a copy

Full Text

• Anderson A (2007) Hope for nanotechnology: Anticipatory knowledge and the governance of affect. Area 39(2):156-165
• Arendt H (1958) The human condition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
• Bensaude-Vincent B (2006) Two cultures of nanotechnology? In: Schummer J, Baird D (eds) Nanotechnology challenges, implications for philosophy, ethics and society. World Scientific, London, pp 7-28
• Berne RW, Schummer J (2005) Teaching societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology to engineering students through science fiction. Bull Sci Technol Soc 25(6):459-468
• Calvino I (1988) Six memos for the next millennium. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
• Claeys J, Debusscher M, Elchardus M, Smets L (2004) Biotechnologie in de publieke sfeer. Vakgroep Sociologie, Onderzoeksgroep TOR, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel
• Crow M, Sarewitz D (2000, September) Nanotechnology and societal transformation. Paper presented at the National Science and Technology Council, Workshop on Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, NSF
• Deblonde M, Barriat V, Warrant F, Goorden L, Valenduc G (2005) Science and precaution in interactive risk evaluation: SPIRE. Belgian Science Policy, Brussels
• De Vries MJ (2006) Analyzing the complexity of nanotechnology. In: Schummer J, Baird D (eds) Nanotechnology challenges, implications for philosophy, ethics and society. World Scientific, London, pp 165-179
• Dryzek JS, Niemeyer SJ (2003, August) Paper for the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia
• Dupuy JP (2004) Complexity and uncertainty, a prudential approach to nanotechnology. A contribution to the work in progress of the 'Foresighting the new technology wave'. High-Level Expert Group, European Commission, Brussels. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/ ci/en/ev.php
• European Communities, Special Eurobarometer (2005) Social values, science and technology, June, 2005
• European Communities (2004) Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology, Communication from the Commission, research DG, retrieved from http://www.cordis.lu/nanotechnology
• Fisher E, Mahajan RL (2006) Contradictory intent? US federal legislation on integrating societal concerns into nanotechnology research and development. Sci Public Policy 33(1):5-16
• Fisher E, Mahajan RL, Mitcham C (2006) Midstream modulation of technology: Governance from within. Bull Sci Technol Soc 26(6):485-496
• Funtowicz S (2007) Van bewijsvoering door deskundigen tot participatieve Dialoog. In: ViWTA Series 'Wetenschap, MaatsWhappij, Politiek: wie stuurt wie? Flemish Parliament, Brussels, pp 11-26
• Garreau J (2005) Radical evolution: The promise and peril of enhancing our minds, our bodies - and what it means to be human. Doubleday, US
• Gibbons M (1999) Science's new contract with society. Nature 402:C81-C84
• Glimell H (2004) Grand visions and lilliput politics: Staging the exploration of the 'endless frontier'. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 231-246
• Goorden L (2004) "Innovation policy and technology assessment in Flanders". Study Commissioned by the Flemish Institute for Science and Technology Assessment
• Goorden L (2006) Met nieuwe participatieve praktijken naar een betere afstemming tussen het maatschappelijke en het politieke debat. Ethiek Maatsch 9(1):76-83
• Goorden L, Van Oudheusden M, Evers J, Deblonde M (2008) Nanotechnologies for tomorrow's society: A case for reflective action research in Flanders, Belgium. In: Fisher E, Selin C, Wetmore J (eds) The yearbook of nanotechnology in society, vol 1. Presenting futures. Springer, Tempe, Arizona, pp 163-183
• Grin J, Felix F, Bos B (2003, August) Practices for reflexive design: lessons from a Dutch programme on sustainable agriculture. Paper for the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia
• Grunwald A (2006) Nanotechnologie als Chiffre der Zukunft. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwarz A (eds) Nanotechnologien im Kontext. Philosophische, ethische und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp 49-80
• Guston DH, Sarewitz D (2006) Real time technology assessment. Technol Soc 24(1-2):93-109
• Hanssen L, Walhout B, Van Est R (2008) Tien lessen voor een nanodialoog Stand van het debat rondom nanotechnologie. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
• Hosper GJ (2002) Clusterbeleid tussen trend en traditie. Tijdschr Wet Technol Samenlev 10(4):152-156
• Hottois G (2003) Aan gene zijde van de biopolitiek? In: Stengers I, Hottois G (eds) Wetenschappelijke en Bio-ethische praktijken. Damon, Budel, pp 68-87
• Hullmann A (2006) The economic development of nanotechnology: An indicators based analysis. European Comission, Brussels, November 28th 2006. [online] http://cordis.europa.eu./nanotechnology [11/01/2007]
• Irwin A (2006) The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance. Soc Stud Sci 36(2):299-320
• Janich P (2006) Wissenschaftstheorie der Nanotechnologie. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwarz AS (eds) Nanotechnologien im kontext. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp 1-32
• Jans E (2006) Let's crash, not clash. In: Toneelg(e)ruis 1, pp 139-142
• Jasanoff S (2006) Designs on nature, science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford
• Jasanoff S (2002) Citizens at risk: Cultures of modernity in the US and EU. Sci Cult 11:3
• Kahan DM, Slovic P, Braman D, Gastil J, Cohen GL (2007) Affect, values, and nanotechnology risk perceptions: An experimental investigation, cultural cognition project working paper No.22. (dan.kahanale.edu)
• Kearnes M, Wynne B (2007) On nanotechnology and ambivalence: The politics of enthusiasm. NanoEthics 1:131-142
• Kunneman H (2005) Voorbij het dikke-ik. Uitgeverij SWP, Amsterdam
• Latour B (2004) Politics of nature. How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, London
• Lopez J (2004) Bridging the gaps: Science fiction in nanotechnology. Special issue on 'Nanotech Challenges'. HYLE 10(2):129-152
• Lösch A (2006a) Anticipating the future of nanotechnology: Some thoughts on the boundaries of sociotechnological visions. Department of Sociology, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt
• Lösch A (2006b) Means of communicating innovations. A case study for the analysis and assessment of nanotechnology's futuristic visions. Sti-studies 2:103-125
• Mody CCM (2004) Small, but determined: Technological determinism in nanoscience. HYLE 10(2):99-128
• Nordmann A (2002) Converging technologies: Shaping the future of European Societies. European Commission, Brussels, 64 pp. [online] http://www.ntnu.no/2020/pdf/final_report_en.pdf [11/01/2007]
• Nordmann A (2003, December) Nanotechnology: Convergence and Integration. Paper presented at the EuroNanoForum, Trieste
• Nordmann A (2004) Molecular disjunctions: Staking claims at the nanoscale. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 51-62
• Nordmann A (2006, Oktober) Design choices in the nanoworld: A space odyssey. Paper presented at the UCSIA Conference 'Nano-researchers facing choices', University of Antwerp
• Nordmann A (2007) If and then: A critique of speculative nanoEthics. Nanoethics 1:31-46
• Pirsig RM (1974) Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance. Corgi Book, London, p 109
• Renn O, Roco MC (2006) White paper on nanotechnology risk governance. White paper no.2, International Risk Governance Council, Geneva
• Rip A (2005) Technology assessment as part of the co-evolution of nanotechnology and society: The thrust of the TA Program in NanoNed. Paper contributed to the Conference on "Nanotechnology in Science, Economy and Society", Marburg.
• Rip A (2006) Folk theories of nanotechnologists. Sci Cult 15:349-365
• Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance. National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia, United States
• Schiemann G (2006) Kein Weg vorbei an der Natur: Natur als gegenpart und Voraussetzung der Nanotechnologie. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwartz A (eds) Nanotechnologien im Kontext. Philosophische, Ethische und Gesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Akademische Verlaggesellschaft, Berlin, pp 115-130
• Schot J, Rip A (1997) The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technol Forecast Soc Change 54(2&3):251-268
• Shrader-Frechette KS (2007) Nanotoxicology and ethical conditions for informed consent. Nanoethics 1:47-56
• Sloterdijk P (2006) Het Kristalpaleis, Een filosofie van de globalisering. SUN, Amsterdam
• STOA (Scientific Technology Options Assessment) (2006) Technology assessment on converging technologies, Report commissioned by the European Parliament
• Swierstra J, Rip A (2007) Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. Nanoethics 1:3-20
• Toumey CP (2006) Narratives for nanotech: Anticipating public reactions to nanotechnology. In: Schummer J, Baird D (eds) Nanotechnology challenges, implications for philosophy, ethics and society. World Scientific, London, pp 383-411
• Van de Poel I (2000) On the role of outsiders in technical development. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 12(3):383-397
• Van Oudheusden M, Evers J (2008, April) Assessing citizens' moral argumentations on nanotechnologies: An incentive to reconsider the interactive technology assessment approach to new and emerging technologies. Paper submitted at the Science and Technology in Society Conference in Washington, DC
• Vasterling V (2007) Cognitive theory and phenomenology in Arendt's and Nussbaum's work on narrative. Hum Stud 30:79-95
• Verbeek PP (2006) Ethiek en Technologie. Moreel actorschap en subjectiviteit in een technologische cultuur. Ethisce Perspect 16(3):267-289
• Whitesides GM (2003) Science and education for nanoscience and nanotechnology. In: Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology - Improving benefits to humanity. NSET and NSF Springer, Arlington Virginia
• Worth S (2006) Narrative knowledge: Knowing through storytelling. Furman University, Greenville, South Carolina