Article (Scientific journals)
Comparison of change in bone resorption and bone mineral density with once-weekly alendronate and daily risedronate: a randomised, placebo-controlled study
Hosking, D.; Adami, S.; Felsenberg, D. et al.
2003In Current Medical Research and Opinion, 19 (5), p. 383-394
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Comparison of change in bone resorption and bone mineral density.pdf
Publisher postprint (5.01 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
alendronate; biochemical markers of bone resorption; bone mineral density; comparability; efficacy; osteoporosis; risedronate
Abstract :
[en] Objective: To compare the effects of alendronate (ALN) 70 mg once weekly (OW) and risedronate (RIS) 5 mg daily between-meal dosing on biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Research design and methods: This was a 3-month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a double-blind extension to 12 months. The study enrolled 549 postmenopausal women (ALN 219, RIS 222 and placebo (PBO) 108) who were : 60 years of age at outpatient centres. Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was reduction in urine N-telopeptides of type 1 collagen (NTx) corrected for creatinine level at 3 months. Secondary parameters included change in BMD at the spine and hip at 6 and 12 months, NTx at 1, 6 and 12 months, and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Adverse experiences (AEs) were recorded throughout the study for an assessment of treatment safety profiles and tolerability. Results: Over 3 months, ALN produced a significantly greater mean reduction in urine NTx than did RIS (-52% vs -32%, p < 0.001), which was maintained at 12 months. ALN produced a significantly greater mean BMD increase than did RIS at 6 months, and it was maintained at 12 months at the lumbar spine (4.8% vs 2.8%, p < 0.001) and total hip (2.7% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001), as well as at the trochanter and femoral neck. Significant reductions in BSAP with ALN compared to RIS were maintained over the 12 months of treatment. Study size did not allow for meaningful assessment of differences in fracture rates. Tolerability was generally similar between ALN, RIS and PBO, and the incidence of upper GI AEs causing discontinuation and oesophageal AEs was similar in the ALN and RIS groups. Conclusion: In this study, ALN 70 mg OW produced a 50% greater reduction in bone resorption as measured by urine NTx and significantly greater increases in lumbar spine and hip BMD than did RIS 5 mg daily. The treatments had similar safety profiles and were generally well-tolerated. Additional studies are needed comparing OW ALN with OW RIS, which became available after the commencement of the present study.
Disciplines :
General & internal medicine
Laboratory medicine & medical technology
Author, co-author :
Hosking, D.
Adami, S.
Felsenberg, D.
Andia, J. C.
Valimaki, M.
Benhamou, L.
Reginster, Jean-Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Epidémiologie et santé publique
Yacik, C.
Rybak-Feglin, A.
Petruschke, R. A.
Zaru, L.
Santora, A. C.
Language :
English
Title :
Comparison of change in bone resorption and bone mineral density with once-weekly alendronate and daily risedronate: a randomised, placebo-controlled study
Publication date :
2003
Journal title :
Current Medical Research and Opinion
ISSN :
0300-7995
eISSN :
1473-4877
Publisher :
Librapharm, Newbury, United Kingdom
Volume :
19
Issue :
5
Pages :
383-394
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 12 June 2012

Statistics


Number of views
64 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
79
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
70
OpenCitations
 
66

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi