Reference : Should we exclude elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from a lon...
Scientific journals : Article
Human health sciences : Cardiovascular & respiratory systems
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/123321
Should we exclude elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from a long-time ambulatory pulmonary rehabilitation programme?
English
CORHAY, Jean-Louis mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Pneumologie-Allergologie >]
NGUYEN DANG, Delphine mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Pneumologie-Allergologie >]
DUYSINX, Bernard mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Pneumologie-Allergologie >]
GRAAS, Cédric mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Pneumologie-Allergologie >]
PIRNAY, Freddy mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Pneumologie-Allergologie >]
BURY, Thierry mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Pneumologie-Allergologie >]
LOUIS, Renaud mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Pneumologie-Allergologie]
2012
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Taylor & Francis Ltd
44
5
466-72
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
1650-1977
[en] Objective: To assess the outcomes of a 6-month comprehensive multidisciplinary outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to age. Design: Prospective cohort study. Patients: A total of 140 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 3-4) admitted to our centre for pulmonary rehabilitation. Methods: Patients were divided into 3 groups: group A (< 65 years), group B (65-74 years) and group C (>/= 75 years). All the patients received an education and individualized training programme. Pulmonary rehabilitation efficacy was evaluated at 6 months of treatment and 12 months post-treatment. Results: A total of 116 patients completed the pulmonary rehabilitation programme: 59 in group A (85.5%), 40 in group B (80%) and 17 in group C (80.9%). All the parameters studied (number of sessions, 6-min walking distance, isometric quadriceps strength, health-related quality of life, maximal load, peak oxygen uptake, maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures) were significantly improved in each of the groups at 3 and 6 months compared with baseline. Moreover, percentage changes from baseline at 6 months for all of the parameters studied were not significantly different between age-groups. Conclusion: Pulmonary rehabilitation is efficient in elderly patients with severe and very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and their compliance with pulmonary rehabilitation was similar to that seen in younger groups. Therefore, elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease should not be denied pulmonary rehabilitation.
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/123321
10.2340/16501977-0973
http://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/?volume=44&issue=5

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Should we exclude elderly_Corhay_12_JRehabilMed.pdfPublisher postprint459.64 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.