magnetospheric physics; auroral phenomena; magnetotail; solar wind-magnetosphere interactions
Abstract :
[en] In a previous study, Blockx et al. (2005) showed that the SI12 camera on board the IMAGE spacecraft is an excellent tool to remotely determine the position of the isotropy boundary (IB) in the ionosphere, and thus is able to provide a reasonable estimate of the amount of stretching of the magnetic field lines in the magetotail. By combining an empirical model of the magnetospheric configuration with Sergeev's criterion for non-adiabatic motion, it is also possible to obtain a theoretical position of IB in the ionosphere, for known conditions in the solar wind. Earlier studies have demonstrated the inadequacy of the Tsyganenko-1989 (T89) model to quantitatively reproduce the field line stretching, particularly during growth phases. In this study, we reexamine this question using the T01 model which considers the time history of the solar wind parameters. We compare the latitude of IB derived from SI12 global images near local midnight with that calculated from the T01 model and the Sergeev's criterion. Observational and theoretical results are found to frequently disagree. We use in situ measurements of the magnetic field with the GOES-8 satellite to discriminate which of the two components in the calculation of the theoretical position of the IB (the T01 model or Sergeev's criterion) induces the discrepancy. For very quiet magnetic conditions, we find that statistically the T01 model approximately predicts the correct location of the maximum proton precipitation. However, large discrepancies are observed in individual cases, as demonstrated by the large scatter of predicted latitudes. For larger values of the AE index, the model fails to predict the observed latitude of the maximum proton intensity, as a consequence of the lack of consideration of the cross-tail current component which produces a more elongated field configuration at the location of the proton injection along the field lines. We show that it is possible to match the observed location of the maximum proton precipitation by decreasing the current sheet half-thickness D parameter. We thus conclude that underestimation of the field line stretching leads to inadequately prediction of the boundary latitude of the non-adiabatic proton precipitation region.
Blockx, Caroline ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Labo de physique atmosphérique et planétaire (LPAP)
Coumans, Valérie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Labo de physique atmosphérique et planétaire (LPAP)
Hubert, Benoît ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Labo de physique atmosphérique et planétaire (LPAP)
Meurant, M.; University of Calgary - U of C. > Institute for Space Research
Language :
English
Title :
A comparison between FUV remote sensing of magnetotail stretching and the T01 model during quiet conditions and growth phases
Publication date :
2007
Journal title :
Annales Geophysicae
ISSN :
0992-7689
eISSN :
1432-0576
Publisher :
European Geosciences Union, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
Bisikalo, D. V., Shematovich, V. I., Gerard, J.-C., Meurant, M., Mende, S. B., and Frey, H. U.: Remote sensing of the proton aurora characteristics from IMAGE-FUV, Ann. Geophys., 21, 2165–2173, 2003.
Blockx, C., Gerard, J.-C., Meurant, M., Hubert, B., and Coumans, V.: Far ultraviolet remote sensing of the isotropy boundary and magnetotail stretching, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A11215, doi:10.1029/2005JA011103, 2005.
Borovsky, J. E. and Funsten, H. O.: MHD turbulence in the Earth's plasma sheet: Dynamics, dissipation, and driving, J. Geophys. Res, 108(A7), 1284, doi:10.1029/2002JA009625, 2003.
Coumans, V., Gerard; J.-C., Hubert, B., and Evans, D. S.: Electron and proton excitation of the FUV aurora: simultaneous IMAGE and NOAA observations, J. Geophys. Res., 107(A11), 1347, doi:10.1029/2001JA009233, 2002.
Coumans, V., Gerard, J.-C., Hubert, B., Meurant, M., and Mende, S. B.: Global auroral conductance distribution due to electron and proton precipitation from IMAGE-FUV observations, Ann. Geophys., 22, 1595–1611, 2004.
Donovan, E. F., Jackel, B. J., Voronkov, I., Sotirelis, T., Creutzberg, F., and Nicholson, N. A.: Ground-based optical determination of the b2i boundary: A basis for an optical MT-index, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 1115, doi:10.1029/2001JA009198, 2003.
Frey H. U., Mende, S. B., Carlson, C. W., Gerard, J. C., Hubert, B., Spann, J., Gladstone, R. G., and Immel, T. J.: The electron and proton aurora as seen by IMAGE-FUV and FAST, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1135–1138, 2001.
Frey, H. U., Mende, S. B., Immel, T. J., Gerard, J. C., Hubert, B., Habraken, S., Spann, J., Gladstone, G. R., Bisikalo, D. V., and Shematovich, V. I.: Summary of quantitative interpretation of IMAGE far ultraviolet auroral data, Space Sci. Rev., 109, 255–283, 2003.
Ganushkina, N. Yu., Pulkkinen, T. I., Kubyshkina, M. V., Sergeev, V. A., Lvova, E. A., Yahnina, T. A., Yahnin, A. G., and Fritz, T.: Proton isotropy boundaries as measured on mid- and low-altitude satellites, Ann. Geophys., 23, 1839–1847, 2005.
Gerard, J. C., Hubert, B., Bisikalo, D. V., and Shematovich, V. I.: A model of the Lyman line profile in the proton aurora, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 15 795–15 805, 2000.
Gerard, J.-C., Hubert, B., Meurant, M., Shematovich, V. I., Bisikalo, D. V., Frey, H. U., Mende, S. B., Gladstone, G. R., and Carlson, C. W.: Observation of the proton aurora with IMAGE FUV imager and simultaneous ion flux in situ measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 28 939–28 948, 2001.
Hubert, B., Gerard, J.-C., Evans, D. S., Meurant, M., Mende, S. B., Frey, H. U., and Immel, T. J.: Total electron and proton energy input during auroral substorms: Remote sensing with IMAGE-FUV, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 1183, doi:10.1029/2001JA009229, 2002.
Kubyshkina, M. V., Sergeev, V. A., and Pulkkinen, T. I.: Hybrid Input Algorithm: An event-oriented magnetospheric model, J. Geophys. Res., 104(A11), 24 977–24 993, 1999.
Mende, S. B., Heetderks, H., Frey, H. U., Lampton, M., Geller, S. P., Habraken, S., Renotte, E., Jamar, C., Rochus, P., Spann, J., Fuselier, S. A., Gerard, J.-C., Gladstone, R., Murphree, S., and Cogger, L.: Far ultraviolet imaging from the IMAGE spacecraft. 1. System design, Space Sci. Rev., 91, 243–270, 2000a.
Mende, S. B., Heetderks, H., Frey, H. U., Lampton, M., Geller, S. P., Abiad, R., Siegmund, W., Tremsin, A. S., Spann, J., Dougani, H., Fuselier, S. A., Magoncelli, A. L., Bumala, M. B., Murphree, S., and Trondsen, T.: Far ultraviolet imaging from the IMAGE spacecraft. 2. Wideband FUV imaging, Space Sci. Rev., 91, 271–285, 2000b.
Meurant, M., Gerard, J.-C., Hubert, B., Coumans, V., Shematovich, V. I., Bisikalo, D. V., Evans, D. S., Gladstone, G. R., and Mende, S. B.: Characteristation and dynamics of the auroral electron precipitation during substorms deduced from IMAGE-FUV, J. Geophys. Res., 108(A6), 1247, doi:10.1029/2002JA009685, 2003.
Newell, P. T., Sergeev, V. A., Bikkuzina, G. R., and Wing, S.: Characterizing the state of the magnetosphere : Testing the ion precipitation maxima latitude (b2i) and the ion isotropy boundary, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 4739–4745, 1998.
Nicholson, N. A., Donovan, E. F., Jackel, B. J., Voronkov, I., Cogger, L. L., Lummerzheim, D., Creutzberg, F., and Sotirelis, T.: Using the optical b2i as a tool for event timing, paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Substorms (ICS-6), NASA, Seattle, Wash., 25–29 March 2002.
Pulkkinen, T. I.: A study of magnetic field and current configurations in the magnetotail at the time of a substorm onset, Planet. Space Sci., 39, 833–845, 1991.
Pulkkinen, T. I., Baker, D. N., Pellinen, R. J., Buchner, J., Koskinen, H. E., Lopez, R. E., Dyson, R. L., and Frank, L.A.: Particle scattering and current sheet stability in the geomagnetic tail during the substorm growth phase, J. Geophys. Res., 97(A12), 19 283–19 297, 1992.
Sergeev, V. A. and Gvozdevsky, B. B.: MT-index – a possible new index to characterize the magnetic configuration of magnetotail, Ann. Geophys., 13, 1093–1103, 1995.
Sergeev, V. A., Sazhina, E. M., and Tsyganenko, N. A.: Pitch-angle scattering of energetic protons in the magnetotail current sheet as the dominant source of their isotropic precipitation into the nightside ionosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 31, 1147–1155, 1983.
Sergeev, V. A., Malkov, M. V., and Mursula, K.: Testing of the isotropic boundary algorithm method to evaluate the magnetic field con\ textregisteredguration in the tail, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 7609–7620, 1993.
Sergeev, V. A., Runov, A., Baumjohann, W., Nakamura, R., Zhang, T. L., Volwerk, M., Balogh A., Reme H., Sauvaud, J. A., Andre, M., and Klecker, B.: Current sheet flapping motion and structure observed by Cluster, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(6), 1327, doi:10.1029/2002GL016500, 2003.
Strickland, D. J., Daniell, R. E., Jasperse, J. R., and Basu, B.: Transport-theoretic model for the electron-proton-hydrogen atom aurora, 2, Model results, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 21 533–21 548, 1993.
Tsyganenko, N. A. and Usmanov, A. V.: Determination of the magnetospheric current system parameters and development of experimental geomagnetic field models based on data from IMP and HEOS satellites, Planet. Space Sci., 30, 985–998, 1982.
Tsyganenko, N. A.: Global quantitative models of the geomagnetic field in the cislunar magnetosphere for different disturbance levels, Planet. Space Sci., 35, 1347–1358, 1987.
Tsyganenko, N. A.: A magnetospheric magnetic field model with a warped tail current sheet, Planet. Space Sci., 37, 5–20, 1989.
Tsyganenko, N. A.: Modelind the Earth's magnetospheric magnetic field confined within a realistic magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res., 100(A4), 5599–5612, 1995.
Tsyganenko, N. A.: A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry: 1. Mathematical structure, J. Geophys. Res., 107(A8), 1179, doi:10.1029/2001JA000219, 2002a.
Tsyganenko, N. A.: A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry: 2. Parameterization and fitting to observations, J. Geophys. Res., 107(A8), 1176, doi:10.1029/2001JA000220, 2002b.
