Adult; Electromyography; Female; Hand/physiology; Humans; Magnetics; Male; Middle Aged; Motor Cortex/physiology; Motor Neurons/physiology; Multiple Sclerosis/physiopathology; Muscle Contraction/physiology; Muscles/physiology; Neural Conduction/physiology; Reflex, Stretch/physiology; Time Factors
Abstract :
[en] Central motor conduction times for the adductor pollicis muscle, the twitch force of that muscle to scalp magnetic motor cortex stimulation, and the maximum force of phasic voluntary contraction of the same muscle were measured in 15 patients with multiple sclerosis. Two tests of manual dexterity of the same hand also were studied: the Purdue pegboard test, and the maximal frequency of a scissors movement of the thumb and index finger. The patients had normal strength or minimal weakness of the intrinsic muscles of the hand on clinical examination. The mean central motor conduction times for the adductor pollicis muscle for the patients were longer than normal, the peak twitch force of the adductor pollicis muscle evoked by cortical stimulation and the maximum force of a phasic voluntary contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle were smaller than normal. There were strong correlations between all these measures. Central motor conduction time in the patients was inversely correlated with voluntary phasic force and the twitch force after cortical stimulation. That is, the longer the central motor conduction time, the weaker the force. Prolonged central motor conduction time is likely to be accompanied by conduction block in corticomotoneuron pathways. The correlation of central motor conduction time with voluntary phasic force and the twitch force most likely reflects the degree of conduction block and temporal dispersion rather than delay in conduction per se. These results indicate that objective assessments of phasic muscle strength may reveal correlations with central motor conduction time that are not evident on conventional clinical examination which assesses tonic muscle contraction strength.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Merton PA, Morton HB (1980) Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject. Nature 285:227.
Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL (1985) Non‐invasive magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Lancet 2:1106-1107.
Cowan JMA, Dick JPR, Day BL (1984) Abnormalities in central motor conduction pathways in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2:304-307.
Mills KR, Murray NMF (1985) Corticospinal tract conduction time in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 18:601-605.
Snooks SJ, Swash M (1985) Motor conduction velocity in the human spinal cord: slowed conduction in multiple sclerosis and radiation myelopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 48:1135-1139.
Thompson PD, Day BL, Rothwell JC (1987) The interpretation of electromyographic responses to electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in diseases of the upper motor neurone. J Neurol Sci 80:91-110.
Barker AT, Freeston IL, Jalinous R, Jarrat JA (1987) Magnetic stimulation of the human brain and peripheral nervous system: an introduction and the results of an initial clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery 20:100-109.
Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NMF, Schriefer TN (1987) Magnetic brain stimulation: central motor conduction studies in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 22:744-752.
Ingram DA, Thompson AJ, Swash M (1988) Central motor conduction in multiple sclerosis: evaluation of abnormalities revealed by transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the brain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51:487-494.
Berardelli A, Inghilleri Cruccu G (1988) Stimulation of motor tracts in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51:677-683.
McAlpine D (1972) Course and prognosis. Multiple sclerosis: a reappraisal , McAlpine D, Lumsden CE, Acheson DA, Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone; 202.
Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 13:227-231.
Costa LD, Vaughan HG, Levita E, Farber N (1963) “Purdue” pegboard test as a predictor of the presence and laterality of cerebral lesions. J Consult Clin Psychol 27:133-137.
Day BL, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD (1987) Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. II. Multiple descending volleys. Brain 110:1191-1209.
Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Day BL (1987) Motor cortex stimulation in intact man 1. General Characteristics of EMG responses in different muscles. Brain 110:1173-1190.
Lawrence DG, Kuypers HGJM (1968) The functional organisation of the nervous system in the monkey. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain 91:1-14.
Hepp‐Reymond MC, Wiesendanger M (1972) Unilateral pyramidotomy in monkeys: effect on force and speed of a conditioned precision grip. Brain Research 36:117-131.
Hepp‐Reymond MC, Trouche E, Wiesendanger M (1974) Effects of unilateral and bilateral pyramidotomy on a conditioned rapid precision grip in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Experimental Brain Research 21:519-527.
Lemon RN, Mantel GWH, Muir RB (1986) Corticospinal facilitation of hand muscles. J Physiol (Lond) 381:497-527.
Evarts EV (1968) Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement. J Neurophysiol 31:14-27.
Cheney PD, Fetz EE (1980) Functional classes of primate corticomotoneuronal cells and their relation to active force. J Neurophysiol 44:773-791.
McDonald WI, Sears TA (1970) The effect of experimental demyelination on conduction in the central nervous system. Brain 93:583-598.
Kaji R, Suzumura A, Sumner AJ (1986) Physiological consequences of antiserum mediated experimental demyelination in CNS. Brain 111:675-694.