<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/">
  <channel>
    <title>ORBi Collection: Laboratory medicine &amp; medical technology</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/105</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/148478" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147920" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147917" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147905" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147904" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147903" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147901" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147897" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147896" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147544" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147542" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147541" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147539" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147538" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147536" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147535" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147241" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147240" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147238" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147214" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <textInput>
    <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
    <description>Search this channel</description>
    <name>search</name>
    <link>http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/simple-search</link>
  </textInput>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/148478">
    <title>Epreuves isocinétiques de résistance à la fatigue</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/148478</link>
    <description>Title: Epreuves isocinétiques de résistance à la fatigue
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: Croisier, Jean-Louis; Bosquet, L.; Maquet, Didier; Kaux, Jean-François; Delvaux, François; Crielaard, Jean-Michel; Forthomme, Bénédicte</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147920">
    <title>Etude de la conduction nerveuse motrice et sensitive aux membres supérieurs et inférieurs</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147920</link>
    <description>Title: Etude de la conduction nerveuse motrice et sensitive aux membres supérieurs et inférieurs
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: WANG, François-Charles; LEJEUNE, Thierry</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147917">
    <title>NEONATAL INVASIVE GROUP B STREPTOCOCCAL (GBS) INFECTIONS IN EUROPE</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147917</link>
    <description>Title: NEONATAL INVASIVE GROUP B STREPTOCOCCAL (GBS) INFECTIONS IN EUROPE
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: MELIN, Pierrette; Berner, Reinhard; Afshar, Baharak; Baldassarri, Lucilla; Detcheva, Antoaneta; de la Rosa, Manuel; Kunze, Mirjam; Kriz, Paula; Efstratiou, Androulla; Hufnagel, Markus; Kilian, Mogens; SEIDEL, Laurence; Telford, John
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Objectives: To describe clinical characteristics and capsular type of GBS isolates responsible of invasive infections in infants from Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech-Republic, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Spain and United Kingdom, representing one of the main objectives of the DEVANI (DEsign of a Vaccine Against Neonatal Infections) project.&#xD;
Methods:   Surveillance of invasive GBS infections in infants was performed from mid-2008 through December 2010. For each case, a standardized case report form was filled. Samples from cases were processed using local procedures. GBS isolates were characterised in national central labs using standardised type-specific (Ia, Ib-IX) latex agglutination and molecular typing methods.&#xD;
Results:   Data on 188 infants with invasive infection  were analysed: 144 (60.6%) early onset diseases (EOD) and 74 (39.4%) late onset diseases (LOD).  In EOD, mean/median ages at onset were 14/0 hours and the male:female ratio was 1.25.  The predominant manifestation at onset was respiratory distress (42% cases); 83% cases were associated with sepsis/bacteremia, 15% with pneumonia and 6% with meningitis.  Late-prenatal screening cultures were obtained  from 51% of cases’ mothers and only half of these were positive for GBS.  Non-elective C-section, intrapartum fever and rupture of membrane (&gt;18h) were more frequent in EO-cases’ mothers versus healthy babies’ GBS-positive mothers.  The major serotypes were III (43%), V (21%) and Ia (18%).  In LOD, mean/median ages at onset were 42/34 days and the male:female ratio was 0.9.  The predominant characteristic at onset was fever (62% cases); 70% cases were associated with sepsis and 30% with meningitis.  Very rare manifestations were osteomyelitis and cellulitis.  Serotype III was highly predominant (80.6%) followed mainly by Ia (12.5%).  Death rates were 4.7/1.5% in EOD/LOD.                                                                                                                                Conclusions:   Clinical presentations were associated with age at onset of infection.  Serotype III predominated in neonatal infections. Prenatal screening was not universal neither sensitive. Study funded through the European Commission Seventh Framework.</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147905">
    <title>Pili genes pattern in Group B streptococci from newborn infections and pregnant women in Europe (DEVANI Project)</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147905</link>
    <description>Title: Pili genes pattern in Group B streptococci from newborn infections and pregnant women in Europe (DEVANI Project)
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: Imperi, Monica; Rinaudo, Daniela; Creti, Roberta; Pataracchia, Marco; Rosini, Roberto; Nuccitelli, Annalisa; Kriz, Paula; Kilian, Mogens; Hufnagel, Markus; Efstratiou, Androulla; de la Rosa, Manuel; MELIN, Pierrette; Detcheva, Antoaneta; Baldassarri, Lucilla; Maione, Domenico
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Objectives&#xD;
Evaluation of the presence and expression of genes coding for pili in a collection of group B streptococcci (GBS) isolated from newborn infection and pregnant women in the course of the DEVANI (Design of a Vaccine Against Neonatal Infection) project.&#xD;
&#xD;
Methods&#xD;
GBS isolates from pregnant women (PW) and cases of newborn infection (NI) were collected in 8 European countries (Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom) during 2009/10 under the auspices of DEVANI. Total no. of strains examined was 1078 and 192 from PW and NI, respectively. Isolates were screened by multiplex PCR and FACS analysis to evaluate respectively gene presence and surface-exposure of pili.  &#xD;
&#xD;
Results&#xD;
The most common gene patterns found were PI-2a alone, PI 1+2a and PI 1+2b, while the PI-2b gene alone was very rare. The most prominent result was that a majority of isolates from NI carried the PI-1+2b gene pattern, while the most common pattern among PW was PI-1+2a. Most of analyzed strains express at least one pilus on their surface.&#xD;
&#xD;
Conclusions&#xD;
All isolates contained at least one gene coding for pili. When present pili 2a and 2b were highly surface exposed.</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147904">
    <title>Group B streptococci, a European perspective with results of the DEVANI project</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147904</link>
    <description>Title: Group B streptococci, a European perspective with results of the DEVANI project
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: MELIN, Pierrette
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: In 2011, neonatal group B streptococcal (GBS) diseases remain a global public health concern. Where consensus guidelines to detect and treat intrapartum women with GBS colonization have been widely adopted, incidence of neonatal early onset disease (EOD) has dramatically declined, however despite preventive strategies cases still occur.  The strategy was not expected to prevent all cases and there are challenges and limitations to this preventive approach.  The best strategy for European countries is still a matter of debate and intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis (IAP) is not widely recommended.  To adopt the best preventive strategy, we first need better data assessing more accurately the true burden of GBS diseases in the different countries. Furthermore, as the current screening-based strategy for prevention is highly effective but imperfect, given the challenges, limitations and potential complications of maternal IAP, a new approach is still needed.  &#xD;
Maternal immunization against GBS is an attractive alternative for the prevention of not only neonatal diseases but also stillbirths and maternal diseases. Vaccines against GBS may likely become the most effective and sustainable long-term preventive strategy.  But the development of vaccines with global relevance has been hampered by changes in the distribution of GBS serotypes of strains causing diseases over time and in different parts of the world.  A multivalent vaccine to cover against the more prevalent serotypes suitable for European populations might not be suitable for Asian or African populations. To overcome type-specificity, new developments target vaccines based on conserved surface antigenic proteins, such as Sip protein located at the cell surface of all GBS and on immunogenic proteins from GBS pili. A pilus-based GBS vaccine is appealing and could become a globally relevant reality. &#xD;
The DEVANI (DEsign of a Vaccine Against Neonatal Infections) programme funded through the European Commission Seventh Framework was launched on 1 January 2008 with the key objective being the assessment of European GBS epidemiology to facilitate the design of a new vaccine that will confer neonatal immunity through a durable maternal immune response. A major component was to undertake pan European surveillance of maternal colonisation, maternal GBS antibody responses and neonatal diseases in eight European countries. Through 2009 and 2010, all Belgian laboratories sending any neonatal GBS invasive isolate to the National Reference Centre for GBS were invited to bring their contribution to this project. &#xD;
Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom established specific GBS screening studies during 2008/10. Maternal vaginal/rectal swabs and sera were taken between 34-37 weeks gestation and processed using a standardised microbiological screening protocol.  Samples from neonatal cases were processed using local procedures.  For each pregnant woman and each case of GBS neonatal disease, standardized case report forms were filled. GBS isolates were characterised using standardised serological and molecular typing methods for detection of all ten GBS capsular polysaccharide types (Ia to IX). Furthermore all the collected isolates were screened by multiplex PCR and FACS analysis to evaluate respectively gene presence and surface-exposure of pili. And clonal analysis of these isolates was performed using multi-locus sequence typing (MLST). &#xD;
The main microbiological results of this pan European surveillance are following.  Carriage rates among pregnant women in all countries ranged from 8% to 26%. The most common GBS capsular types were III (33%), Ia (25%) and V (8%). Among GBS from EOD, the major serotypes were III (43%), V (21%) and Ia (18%).  In contrast among GBS isolated from neonatal late onset disease (LOD), serotype III was highly predominant (80.6%) followed mainly by Ia (12.5%).&#xD;
Analysis of the pattern of pili genes showed that all isolates contained at least one gene coding for pili. The most common gene patterns found were PI-2a alone, PI 1+2a and PI 1+2b, while the PI-2b gene alone was very rare. The most prominent result was that a majority of isolates from neonatal infections carried the PI-1+2b gene pattern, while the most common pattern among pregnant women was PI-1+2a. Most of analyzed strains express at least one pilus on their surface.&#xD;
The clonal analysis showed that 66 sequence types were found to belong to nine clonal complexes (CC). Among these nine CCs, five were prevailing and covered 92 % of GBS isolates tested. The GBS population in pregnant women was found to be more heterogeneous than the GBS isolated from neonatal infection cases. Among neonatal isolates, the most frequent CC was CC17 (43 %) known as a highly virulent clone. Among participating countries, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of clonal complexes.&#xD;
The analysis of the levels of specific antibodies as surrogate markers of protection is still ongoing. &#xD;
More detailed and additional results as the main conclusions will be presented.</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147903">
    <title>GBS colonization and screening in pregnancy: how does it work in Europe?</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147903</link>
    <description>Title: GBS colonization and screening in pregnancy: how does it work in Europe?
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: MELIN, Pierrette
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: In Europe, as in North America, GBS infections among infants are associated to high morbidity and mortality even if some differences exist between different European countries.&#xD;
During the past two decades, major initiatives have been proposed to prevent early onset GBS disease (EOD) and they are still subject of controversy.  Several European countries have issued guidelines for the prevention of neonatal GBS diseases, either universal screening-based or risk-based strategy, others have no official guidelines at all.  In countries having guidelines, despite considerable efforts and economic resources spent on intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis for GBS EOD, cases continue to occur. Among these cases there are a lot of missed opportunities to administer IAP but there are also false negative screening. Therefore in the setting of a maternal GBS-screening program and successful implementation of the strategy, efforts to improve screening for GBS status remain important.&#xD;
The natural reservoir for GBS is the gastrointestinal tract and is likely the source for vaginal colonization.  Among pregnant women, GBS carriage rate in the vaginal and rectal flora ranges from 10% up to 30%.  Critical factors that influence the accuracy of detecting GBS maternal colonization are the choice of the body sites sampled, the timing of sampling and the use of selective culture media.  The evolution of the different culture options to improve the GBS-screening strategy will be reviewed. &#xD;
If the optimal time for performing antenatal cultures is between 35 to 37 weeks’ gestation, as GBS carriage is highly variable, the predictive values of GBS antenatal cultures are not always as good predictors of the maternal GBS status at presentation for delivery as expected.&#xD;
Potential alternative to antenatal GBS-screening culture is the identification of GBS colonization at presentation for delivery.  Use of a reliable, sensitive, easy to use rapid test should be cost effective leading to the prevention of more EOGBS cases while reducing the number of unnecessarily IAP.  Advances of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescence labeling technologies has provided new detection tools for bacterial identification.  Therefore, commercialization of rapid detection of GBS through real-time PCR offers the potential for GBS detection among women without prenatal care or those in whom no antenatal culture was collected.  However questions of costs and logistics remain unanswered.&#xD;
Could such rapid intrapartum test replace existing screening strategies or could it be used in conjunction with them?&#xD;
Colonizing rates and recommended screening procedures existing through Europe will be reviewed.</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147901">
    <title>The future of microbiology</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147901</link>
    <description>Title: The future of microbiology
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: MELIN, Pierrette</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147897">
    <title>GBS AND THE NEONATE: PREVENTION STRATEGIES</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147897</link>
    <description>Title: GBS AND THE NEONATE: PREVENTION STRATEGIES
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: MELIN, Pierrette
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Streptococcus agalactiae, or group B streptococcus (GBS), remains the leading cause of neonatal sepsis and meningitis, early onset and late onset diseases (EOD, LOD). &#xD;
Where consensus guidelines to detect and treat intrapartum women with GBS colonization have been widely adopted, incidence of neonatal EOD has dramatically declined.  In response to both successful impacts on the incidence of GBS-EOD and analyses of missed opportunities, the first American guidelines for prevention issued in the 90s have since been adapted in several stages to improve their efficacy.  In some countries in Europe, nationwide guidelines, whether screening-based or risk-based, for the prevention of neonatal GBS diseases have also been issued and adopted, with the expected impact on incidence of GBS-EOD.  In spite of universal screening, in spite of the great progress that has been made, GBS-EOD continues to occur and the GBS burden remains a significant public health issue.  Continuous efforts to improve screening for GBS status continue to be important and may be able to take advantage of new rapid diagnostic technologies.  The current screening-based strategy for prevention is highly effective but imperfect.  Given the challenges, limitations and potential complications of maternal intrapartum prophylaxis, a new approach is still needed.  &#xD;
Maternal immunization against GBS is an attractive alternative for the prevention of not only neonatal diseases but also stillbirths and maternal diseases.  Vaccines against GBS may likely become the most effective and sustainable long-term preventive strategy.</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147896">
    <title>Microbiological diagnosis of infectious keratitis</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147896</link>
    <description>Title: Microbiological diagnosis of infectious keratitis
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: MELIN, Pierrette</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147544">
    <title>Prise en charge des patients lithiasiques</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147544</link>
    <description>Title: Prise en charge des patients lithiasiques
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: GADISSEUR, Romy</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147542">
    <title>Les allergies médicamenteuses : point de vue du biologiste</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147542</link>
    <description>Title: Les allergies médicamenteuses : point de vue du biologiste
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: GADISSEUR, Romy</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147541">
    <title>Allergie alimentaire de l'enfant</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147541</link>
    <description>Title: Allergie alimentaire de l'enfant
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: GADISSEUR, Romy</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147539">
    <title>Nouveautés dans le diagnostic des allergies</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147539</link>
    <description>Title: Nouveautés dans le diagnostic des allergies
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: GADISSEUR, Romy</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147538">
    <title>Les problèmes cutanés liés aux médicaments</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147538</link>
    <description>Title: Les problèmes cutanés liés aux médicaments
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: GADISSEUR, Romy</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147536">
    <title>Les problèmes cutanés liés aux médicaments</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147536</link>
    <description>Title: Les problèmes cutanés liés aux médicaments
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: GADISSEUR, Romy</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147535">
    <title>Les problèmes cutanés liés aux médicaments</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147535</link>
    <description>Title: Les problèmes cutanés liés aux médicaments
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: GADISSEUR, Romy
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Les problèmes cutanés liés aux médicaments</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147241">
    <title>Maladie hémolytique néonatale modérée due à un anti‐RH46</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147241</link>
    <description>Title: Maladie hémolytique néonatale modérée due à un anti‐RH46
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: MONFORT, Mélanie</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147240">
    <title>"Passenger Lymphocyte Syndrome” et “Host Versus Graft Reaction” après transplantation hépatique</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147240</link>
    <description>Title: "Passenger Lymphocyte Syndrome” et “Host Versus Graft Reaction” après transplantation hépatique
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: MONFORT, Mélanie</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147238">
    <title>Réaction transfusionnelle hémolytique retardée (RTHR) suite à une transfusion massive de concentrés érythrocytaires ABO-incompatibles</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147238</link>
    <description>Title: Réaction transfusionnelle hémolytique retardée (RTHR) suite à une transfusion massive de concentrés érythrocytaires ABO-incompatibles
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: MONFORT, Mélanie</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147214">
    <title>Hemovigilance: Clinical Tolerance of Solvent-Detergent Treated Plasma</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2268/147214</link>
    <description>Title: Hemovigilance: Clinical Tolerance of Solvent-Detergent Treated Plasma
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author, co-author: Baudoux, Etienne; Margraff, U.; Coenen, Alain; Jacobs, X.; Deboutez, Martine; Lungu, C.; Sondag-Thull, D.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to assess retrospectively the clinical tolerance of SD treated plasma and to compare it to other labile blood products (red blood cell and platelet concentrates). METHODS: Adverse events (AEs) related to the use of blood products at the Blood Transfusion Center (BTC) are routinely collected through a formalised system of hemovigilance. All AEs reported are entered into a safety data base which was used for the study. All AEs reported during a one-year period to the BTC were retrospectively re-assessed and descriptive statistics calculated. RESULTS: 5064 units of SD treated plasma were transfused to 894 recipients during the study period at the occasion of 1553 transfusions. No AE associated to SD treatment plasma was reported during that period. In contrast, during the same period, 485 AEs associated with the use of red blood cell concentrates (RBCC) were reported in 251 patients at the occasion of 262 transfusions. 2.1% (251/11,748) of the patients transfused with RBCC experienced one or more AEs. The incidence of AEs per unit transfused was 1.3% (485/37,332), and 2.4% (485/20,460) of RBCC transfusions were associated with one or more AEs. 142 AEs associated with the use of platelet concentrate (PC) were observed in 69 patients at the occasion of 73 transfusions. 4.2% (69/1645) of patients transfused with PC experienced one or more AEs. The incidence of AEs per unit transfused was 1.1% (142/12,772), and 2.8% (142/5034) of PC transfusions were associated with one or more AEs. All reported AEs were classified and non serious. The most frequently observed AEs were fever, chills and rashes which accounted for roughly 64% of all reported AEs. CONCLUSION: As for the overall clinical tolerance of red cell and platelet concentrates, the results of this study are in complete agreement with the published literature. The study also confirms the extremely good tolerability of SD treated plasma in comparison with other labile blood products.</description>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

