Browsing
     by title


0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

or enter first few letters:   
OK
Peer Reviewed
See detailHarmonic Trusses : the Search for Minimum Weight
Samyn, Philippe; Latteur, Pierre ULg

(1998, February)

Detailed reference viewed: 18 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailHarmonic-Balance Finite-Element Modelling of Electromagnetic Devices: A Novel Approach
Gyselinck, J.; Dular, Patrick ULg; Geuzaine, Christophe ULg et al

in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics (2002), 38(2), 521--524

Detailed reference viewed: 20 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailL’Harmonie des doctrines dans le néoplatonisme tardif. Platon et Aristote chez Simplicius
Gavray, Marc-Antoine ULg

in Annuaire de l'École Pratique des Hautes Etudes. Section des Sciences Religieuses (2013), 120(2011-2012), 83-39

Detailed reference viewed: 10 (3 ULg)
Full Text
See detailL'harmonie et le chaos. Le rationalisme leibnizien et la "nouvelle science"
Bouquiaux, Laurence ULg

Book published by Peeters (1994)

Detailed reference viewed: 5 (0 ULg)
Full Text
See detailL’harmonisation des conditions individuelles de travail en cas de transfert conventionnel d’entreprise
Kefer, Fabienne ULg

in La cession d’entreprise : les aspects sociaux (2011, April 07)

Detailed reference viewed: 43 (3 ULg)
Peer Reviewed
See detailHarmonisation des démarches de validation, est-elle possible ?
Hubert, Philippe ULg; Chiap, Patrice ULg; Laurentie, M. et al

Conference (2003)

Detailed reference viewed: 22 (1 ULg)
See detailL'harmonisation des législations des Etats membres de la C.E.E. en matière d'impôts directs
Thilmany, Jean ULg

in Revue pratique des sociétés (1981)

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailHarmonisation des strategies de validation et estimation de l'incertitude associee dans le cadre de l'accreditation des laboratoires d'essais
Hubert, Philippe ULg; Rozet, Eric ULg; Boulanger, Bruno ULg et al

in Acta Clinica Belgica. Supplementum (2006), S1(1), 53-55

In order to achieve the harmonization of validation strategies, the interpretation of several validation criteria is proposed. Furthermore, a simple and visual decision tool to assess the validity of an ... [more ▼]

In order to achieve the harmonization of validation strategies, the interpretation of several validation criteria is proposed. Furthermore, a simple and visual decision tool to assess the validity of an analytical procedure is described: the accuracy profile based on the estimation of the total error of the measurements. This profile build with beta-expectation tolerance intervals can also compute with efficiency the uncertainty related to the results of a laboratory, which is an essential parameter for the accreditation of laboratories under ISO 17025. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 81 (17 ULg)
See detailHarmonisation du droit de la construction et protection du consommateur
Kohl, Benoît ULg

Scientific conference (2008, May 08)

Detailed reference viewed: 9 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailHarmonisation et construction
Kohl, Benoît ULg

Article for general public (2009)

Detailed reference viewed: 34 (14 ULg)
Peer Reviewed
See detailHarmonisation of Construction Liabilities in the European Union
Kohl, Benoît ULg

Conference (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 1 (0 ULg)
See detailHarmonisation of European Construction Law : Consumers First
Kohl, Benoît ULg

Conference (2008, September 04)

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailHarmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures - A SFSTP proposal - part I
Hubert, Philippe ULg; Nguyen-Huu, J.-J.; Boulanger, Bruno ULg et al

in Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis (2004), 36(3), 579-586

This paper is the first part of a summary report of a new commission of the Societe Francaise des Sciences et Techniques Pharmaceutiques (SFSTP). The main objective of this commission was the ... [more ▼]

This paper is the first part of a summary report of a new commission of the Societe Francaise des Sciences et Techniques Pharmaceutiques (SFSTP). The main objective of this commission was the harmonization of approaches for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures. Indeed, the principle of the validation of theses procedures is today widely spread in all the domains of activities where measurements are made. Nevertheless. this simple question of acceptability or not of an analytical procedure for a given application, remains incompletely determined in several cases despite the various regulations relating to the good practices (GLP, GMP,...) and other documents of normative character (ISO, ICH. FDA,...). There are many official documents describing the criteria of validation to be tested, but they do not propose any experimental protocol and limit themselves most often to the general concepts. For those reasons, two previous SFSTP commissions elaborated validation guides to concretely help the industrial scientists in charge of drug development to apply those regulatory recommendations. If these two first guides widely contributed to the use and progress of analytical validations, they present, nevertheless, weaknesses regarding the conclusions of the performed statistical tests and the decisions to be made with respect to the acceptance limits defined by the use of an analytical procedure. The present paper proposes to review even the bases of the analytical validation for developing harmonized approach, by distinguishing notably the diagnosis rules and the decision rules. This latter rule is based on the use of the accuracy profile, uses the notion of total error and allows to simplify the approach of the validation of an analytical procedure while checking the associated risk to its usage. Thanks to this novel validation approach, it is possible to unambiguously demonstrate the fitness for purpose of a new method as stated in all regulatory documents. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 202 (33 ULg)