Browsing
     by title


0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

or enter first few letters:   
OK
Peer Reviewed
See detailDiscussing the validation of high-dimensional probability distribution learning with mixtures of graphical models for inference
Schnitzler, François ULg

Poster (2010, October 06)

Exact inference on probabilistic graphical models quickly becomes intractable when the dimension of the problem increases. A weighted average (or mixture) of different simple graphical models can be used ... [more ▼]

Exact inference on probabilistic graphical models quickly becomes intractable when the dimension of the problem increases. A weighted average (or mixture) of different simple graphical models can be used instead of a more complicated model to learn a distribution, allowing probabilistic inference to be much more efficient. I hope to discuss issues related to the validation of algorithms for learning such mixtures of models and to high-dimensional learning of probabilistic graphical models in general, and to gather valuable feedback and comments on my approach. The main problems are the difficulties to assess the accuracy of the algorithms and to choose a representative set of target distributions. The accuracy of algorithms for learning probabilistic graphical models is often evaluated by comparing the structure of the resulting model to the target (e.g. Number of similar/dissimilar edges, score BDe etc). This approach however falls short when studying methods using a mixture of simple models : individually, these lack the representation power to model the true distribution, and only their combination allows them to compete with more sophisticated models. The Kullback-Leibler divergence is a measure of the difference between two probability densities, and can be used to compare any model learned from a dataset to the data generating distribution. For computational reasons, I however had to resort to a Monte Carlo estimation of this quantity for large problems (starting at around 200 variables). Since probabilistic inference is the ultimate motivation for building these models, and not probability modelling, a more meaningful measure of accuracy could be obtained by comparing mixtures against a combination of state of the art model learning and approximate inference algorithms. However, the exact inference result cannot be easily assessed for interesting target distributions, since the use of mixtures is precisely considered because exact inference is not possible on said targets, and approximate inference would introduce a bias. Selecting a target distribution used to generate the data sets on which the algorithms are evaluated also proved a challenge. The easiest solution was to generate them at random (although different approaches can be designed). These models are however likely to be rather different from real problems, and thus constitute a poor choice to assess the practical interest of mixture of models. Methods (e.g. linking multiple copies of a given network) have been developed to increase the size of models known by the community (e.g. the alarm network), and the obtained graphical models have been made available. These could however still be far from the kind of interactions present in a real setting. A better way to proceed could be to generate samples based on the equations describing a physical problem, to learn a probabilistic model as best as possible from this high-dimensional dataset, and to use it as target distribution. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 49 (4 ULg)
See detailDiscussion
Richelle, Marc ULg

in Angelergue, André (Ed.) Psychologie de la connaissance de soi (1975)

Detailed reference viewed: 2 (0 ULg)
Full Text
See detailDiscussion : l'astronomie actuelle
Swings, Polydore ULg; Bruhat, M.; Ulmo, M. et al

in Berr, Henri (Ed.) Le ciel dans l'histoire et la science : exposés de la huitième semaine internationale de synthèse (1936)

Detailed reference viewed: 8 (2 ULg)
Peer Reviewed
See detailDiscussion : Pratiques évaluatives en classe et épreuves externes
Lafontaine, Dominique ULg

in Congrès international. Actualité de al recherche en éducation et en formation. AREF 2010 (2010)

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (2 ULg)
Full Text
See detailLa discussion à visée démocratique et philosophique au prisme de la critique deleuzienne de la discussion. Analyse d'un verbatim.
Herla, Anne ULg; Jeanmart, Gaëlle

in Diotime. Revue internationale de didactique de la philosophie. (2014, April), 60

Detailed reference viewed: 47 (4 ULg)
Full Text
See detailDiscussion de cas cliniques et atelier pratique
WANG, François-Charles ULg

Conference (2014, October 04)

Detailed reference viewed: 14 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailDiscussion de cas de neurophysiologie clinique
WANG, François-Charles ULg; MAQUET, Pierre ULg

Scientific conference (2013, September 19)

Detailed reference viewed: 28 (3 ULg)
Full Text
See detailDiscussion de la communication faite par M. Demoor, membre titulaire, sous le titre: "Le mécanisme du rythme cardiaque".
Fredericq, Léon ULg

in Bulletin de l'Académie Royale de Médecine de Belgique (1880)

Detailed reference viewed: 2 (0 ULg)
Full Text
See detailDiscussion des rapports
Richelle, Marc ULg

in La genèse de la parole : 16e symposium de l'Association de psychologie scientifique de langue française (1977)

Detailed reference viewed: 3 (0 ULg)
Full Text
See detailDiscussion des rapports de P. Fraisse et R. Chauvin
Richelle, Marc ULg

in Canestrelli, I. (Ed.) Le comportement : symposium de l'Association de psychologie de langue française, Rome, 1967 (1968)

Detailed reference viewed: 6 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailDiscussion of "Sensitivity analysis of non-equilibrium adaptation parameters for modeling mining-pit migration"
Gouverneur, Ludovic ULg; Dewals, Benjamin ULg; Archambeau, Pierre ULg et al

in Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (2013), 139(7), 799-801

Detailed reference viewed: 100 (31 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailDiscussion of "Two-dimensional depth-averaged finite volume model for unsteady turbulent flows"
Erpicum, Sébastien ULg; Pirotton, Michel ULg; Archambeau, Pierre ULg et al

in Journal of Hydraulic Research (2014), 52(1), 148-150

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (8 ULg)
Peer Reviewed
See detailDiscussion of a diet history in cancer field
Guillaume, Michèle ULg

in Programme Nutritional Epidemiology Meeting on Diet History (1989, October)

Detailed reference viewed: 12 (5 ULg)
Peer Reviewed
See detailA discussion of methods for estimating residual fluxes in strong tidal estuaries
Regnier, P.; Mouchet, Anne ULg; Wollast, R. et al

in Continental Shelf Research (1998), 18

Detailed reference viewed: 22 (5 ULg)
See detailDiscussion on "Recapturing the Reluctant Radical. How to win back Europe’s populist vote"
Jamin, Jérôme ULg

Conference given outside the academic context (2012)

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailDiscussion on Paper D04 “Ultimate limit state design technology for aluminium multi-hull ship structures, SNAME Transactions, Vol.113, (2005)”
Rigo, Philippe ULg; Richir, Thomas

in Ultimate limit state design technology for aluminium multi-hull ship structures, SNAME Transactions, Vol.113 (2005)

Detailed reference viewed: 40 (1 ULg)