Browsing
     by title


0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

or enter first few letters:   
OK
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of Denosumab compared with generic alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg

in Osteoporosis International (2011, March), 22(Suppl.1), 112-113

Detailed reference viewed: 45 (11 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Boonen, Annelies; Dirksen, Carmen D. et al

in Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research (2013), 13(1), 19-28

Denosumab is a novel biological agent for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with increased risk of fractures. With limited healthcare resources, economic evaluations are increasingly ... [more ▼]

Denosumab is a novel biological agent for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with increased risk of fractures. With limited healthcare resources, economic evaluations are increasingly being used by decision-makers to optimize healthcare resource allocation. The cost-effectiveness of denosumab has been evaluated in various studies, and a systematic literature study was conducted up to April 2012 to identify all published research articles and research abstracts presented at various congresses. This article provides a systematic review of four articles and eight abstracts reporting on the cost-effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of osteoporosis. In most economic evaluations, denosumab has been considered as a cost-effective treatment compared with first-line and second-line options (including generic alendronate) in the treatment of women with high risk of fractures. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (3 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of mass screening and targeted biphosphonates treatment in osteoporosis
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Ethgen, Olivier ULg et al

in Osteoporosis International (2008, April), 19(S1), 117

Detailed reference viewed: 26 (10 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening campaign for Belgian women
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Ethgen, Olivier ULg et al

in Value in Health (2007, October), 10(6), 395

Detailed reference viewed: 18 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening Followed by Treatment: The Impact of Medication Adherence.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Gathon, Henry-Jean ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg et al

in Value in Health (2010), 13(4), 394-401

ABSTRACT Objective: To estimate the impact of medication adherence on the cost-effectiveness of mass-screening by bone densitometry followed by alendronate therapy for women diagnosed with osteoporosis ... [more ▼]

ABSTRACT Objective: To estimate the impact of medication adherence on the cost-effectiveness of mass-screening by bone densitometry followed by alendronate therapy for women diagnosed with osteoporosis. Methods: A validated Markov microsimulation model with a Belgian health-care payer perspective and a lifetime horizon was used to assess the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of the screening/treatment strategy compared with no intervention. Real-world adherence to alendronate therapy and full adherence over 5 years were both investigated. The real-world adherence scenario employed adherence data from published observational studies, and medication adherence was divided into persistence, compliance, and primary adherence. Uncertainty was investigated using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: At 65 years of age, the costs per QALY gained because of the screening/treatment strategy versus no intervention are euro32,008 and euro16,918 in the real-world adherence and full adherence scenarios, respectively. The equivalent values are euro80,836 and euro40,462 at the age of 55 years, and they decrease to euro10,600 and euro1229 at the age of 75 years. Sensitivity analyses show that the presence of the upfront cost of case finding has a substantial role in the impact of medication adherence on cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: This study indicates that nonadherence with osteoporosis medications substantially increases the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of osteoporosis screening strategies. All aspects of medication adherence (i.e., compliance, persistence, and primary adherence) should therefore be reported and included in pharmacoeconomic analyses, and especially in the presence of the upfront cost of case finding (such as screening cost). [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 85 (22 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Vanoverberghe, Marie ULg; Neuprez, Audrey ULg et al

in Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (2010), 10(4), 359-366

Strontium ranelate has recently been introduced for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in Europe and in many countries worldwide. This study aims to review the published cost-effectiveness ... [more ▼]

Strontium ranelate has recently been introduced for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in Europe and in many countries worldwide. This study aims to review the published cost-effectiveness literature pertaining to strontium ranelate. Six studies were identified: two in United Kingdom, two in Belgium and two in Sweden. The findings were consistent across the literature, suggesting that strontium ranelate is a cost-saving drug for women with osteoporosis aged over 80 years of age, and it is a cost-effective treatment compared with no treatment for osteoporotic women aged over 70 years and for younger women with clinical risk factors for fragility fracture. Strontium ranelate was also shown to be cost-effective compared with branded risedronate in osteoporotic women over 75 years. Further analyses are required to assess effectiveness and adherence to strontium ranelate in real-life settings, as well as to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in other countries and in populations of men. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 48 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg et al

in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA (2013)

The results of this study suggest that, under the assumption of same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women, strontium ranelate could be considered a cost-effective strategy compared ... [more ▼]

The results of this study suggest that, under the assumption of same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women, strontium ranelate could be considered a cost-effective strategy compared with no treatment for the treatment of osteoporotic men from a Belgian healthcare payer perspective. INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of osteoporotic men. METHODS: A previously validated Markov microsimulation model was adapted to estimate the cost (<euro>2,010) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of strontium ranelate compared with no treatment. Similar efficacy data on lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) between men with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture (MALEO Trial) and postmenopausal osteoporotic women (pivotal SOTI, TROPOS trials) supports the assumption, in the base-case analysis, of the same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women. Analyses were conducted, from a Belgian healthcare payer perspective, in the population from the MALEO Trial who is a men population with a mean age of 73 years, and BMD T-score </=-2.5 or prevalent vertebral fracture (PVF). RESULTS: In the MALEO population, strontium ranelate compared with no treatment was estimated at <euro>49,798 and <euro>25,584 per QALY gained using efficacy data from the intent-to-treat analysis and the per-protocol analysis including only adherent patients, respectively. In men with a BMD T-score </=-2.5 or with PVF, the cost per QALY gained of strontium ranelate fall below thresholds of <euro>45,000 and <euro>25,000 per QALY gained based on efficacy data from the entire population of the clinical trial and from the per-protocol analyses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that, under the assumption of same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women, strontium ranelate could be considered cost-effective compared with no treatment for male osteoporosis. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 10 (5 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate versus intravenous ibandronate in the treatment of postmenopausal women
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Neuprez, Audrey ULg; Scholtissen, Sophie et al

in Osteoporosis International (2009, March), 20(S1), 130

Detailed reference viewed: 62 (7 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate versus risedronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg

in Bone (2010), 46(2), 440-6

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated Markov microsimulation ... [more ▼]

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated Markov microsimulation model with a Belgian payer's perspective estimated the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of a 3-year strontium ranelate treatment compared with no treatment and with the bisphosphonate risedronate. Data on the effect of both treatments on fracture risk were taken from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Analyses were performed for postmenopausal women aged 75 and 80 years, either with a diagnosis of osteoporosis (i.e. bone mineral density T-score </=-2.5 SD) or with prevalent vertebral fractures (PVF). Parameter uncertainty was evaluated using both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Strontium ranelate was dominant (i.e. more effective and less costly) versus risedronate for women with osteoporosis aged over 75 years and for women with PVF aged 80 years. The cost per QALY gained of strontium ranelate compared with risedronate at 75 years of age was euro11,435 for women with PVF. When compared with no treatment, the costs per QALY gained of strontium ranelate were euro15,588 and euro7,708 at 75 and 80 years of age for women with osteoporosis; the equivalent values were euro16,518 and euro6,015 for women with PVF. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that strontium ranelate was generally more cost-effective than risedronate, in the range of 60% in all cases. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that strontium ranelate is a cost-effective strategy, in a Belgian setting, for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 38 (5 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of vitamin D and calcium supplementation in the treatment of elderly women and men with osteoporosis.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Ben Sedrine, Wafa; Bruyère, Olivier ULg et al

in European journal of public health (2015), 25(1), 20-25

BACKGROUND: The supplementation with vitamin D and calcium has been recommended for elderly, specifically those with increased risk of fractures older than 65 years. This study aims to assess the cost ... [more ▼]

BACKGROUND: The supplementation with vitamin D and calcium has been recommended for elderly, specifically those with increased risk of fractures older than 65 years. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of vitamin D and calcium supplementation in elderly women and men with osteoporosis and therefore to assess if this recommendation is justified in terms of cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A validated model for economic evaluations in osteoporosis was used to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of vitamin D/calcium supplementation compared with no treatment. The model was populated with cost and epidemiological data from a Belgian health-care perspective. Analyses were conducted in women and men with a diagnosis of osteoporosis (i.e. bone mineral density T-score </=-2.5). A literature search was conducted to describe the efficacy of vitamin D and calcium in terms of fracture risk reduction. RESULTS: The cost per QALY gained of vitamin D/calcium supplementation was estimated at euro40 578 and euro23 477 in women and men aged 60 years, respectively. These values decreased to euro7912 and euro10 250 at the age of 70 years and vitamin D and calcium supplementation was cost-saving at the age of 80 years, meaning that treatment cost was less than the costs of treating osteoporotic fractures of the no-treatment group. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that vitamin D and calcium supplementation is cost-effective for women and men with osteoporosis aged over 60 years. From an economic perspective, vitamin D and calcium should therefore be administrated in these populations including those also taking other osteoporotic treatments. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 31 (11 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of vitamin D and calcium supplementation in the treatment of postmenopausal women
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Rabenda, Véronique ULg et al

in Osteoporosis International (2013, April), 24(Suppl.1), 198

Detailed reference viewed: 38 (6 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-utility of calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Ethgen, Olivier ULg et al

in Osteoporosis International (2008, December), 19(S2), 363

Detailed reference viewed: 26 (8 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-utility of denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg

in Osteoporosis International (2009, March), 20(S1), 5

Detailed reference viewed: 53 (8 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-utility of long-term strontium ranelate treatment for postmenopausal osteoporotic women.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg

in Osteoporosis International (2010), 21

The results of this study suggested that long-term treatment with strontium ranelate over 5 years is cost-effective compared to no treatment for postmenopausal osteoporotic women. INTRODUCTION: This study ... [more ▼]

The results of this study suggested that long-term treatment with strontium ranelate over 5 years is cost-effective compared to no treatment for postmenopausal osteoporotic women. INTRODUCTION: This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of long-term strontium ranelate treatment for postmenopausal osteoporotic women. METHODS: A validated Markov microsimulation model with a Belgian healthcare cost perspective was used to assess the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of strontium ranelate compared to no treatment, on a basis of calcium/vit D supplementation if needed. Analyses were performed for women aged 70, 75, and 80 years either with a bone mineral density T-score </= -2.5 SD or with prevalent vertebral fractures. The relative risk of fracture during therapy was derived from the Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis Study trial over 5 years of treatment. Parameter uncertainty was evaluated using both univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Strontium ranelate was cost-saving at the age of 80 years in both populations. For women with a T-score </= -2.5 SD, the costs per QALY gained of strontium ranelate were respectively <euro>15,096 and <euro>6,913 at 70 and 75 years of age while these values were <euro>23,426 and <euro>9,698 for women with prevalent vertebral fractures. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust over a wide range of assumptions. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that, compared to no treatment, long-term strontium ranelate treatment is cost-effective for postmenopausal osteoporotic women. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 56 (14 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-utility of strontium ranelate in the treatment of postmenopausal women
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Ethgen, Olivier ULg et al

in Osteoporosis International (2008, April), 19(S1), 6

Detailed reference viewed: 11 (5 ULg)