References of "Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l'Homme [= RTDH]"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailQuel universalisme des droits de l'homme?
Delruelle, Edouard ULg

in Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l'Homme [= RTDH] (2014), 98

Detailed reference viewed: 2 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailL’obligation incombant au juge de poser une question préjudicielle à la Cour de justice, élément vaporeux du procès équitable
Donnay, Luc ULg

in Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l'Homme [= RTDH] (2013), 96

Note d'observations sous Cour eur. dr. h., Ullens de Schooten et Rezabek c. Belgique, 20 septembre 2011

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailLe principe de la preuve unique ou déterminante
Michiels, Olivier ULg

in Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l'Homme [= RTDH] (2012), 91

The Court found that a conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness would not automatically result in a breach of Article 6 § 1. However, counterbalancing factors had to be ... [more ▼]

The Court found that a conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness would not automatically result in a breach of Article 6 § 1. However, counterbalancing factors had to be in place, including strong procedural safeguards, to compensate for the difficulties caused to the defence and to guarantee a fair trial. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 64 (4 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailL’influence du cadre historique et politique dans la jurisprudence électorale de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. Réflexions autour de l’arrêt Grosaru c. Roumanie du 2 mars 2010
Bouhon, Frédéric ULg

in Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l'Homme [= RTDH] (2011), 85

In the case Grosaru v. Romania, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the verification-mechanism of powers of elected representatives by the Romanian Parliament lacked impartiality and violated ... [more ▼]

In the case Grosaru v. Romania, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the verification-mechanism of powers of elected representatives by the Romanian Parliament lacked impartiality and violated Article 3 of Protocol No 1. Regarding the issue of the possible generalisation of this conclusion to other States which experience a similar system, the high jurisdiction sends a blurred message: it affirms that some States benefit from a long democratic tradition which would seem to dispel doubts on the legitimacy of such a practice. This study aims to analyse – in a general perspective – the role acknowledged by the Court to the historical and political context in its electoral case-law. The precise scope of the Grosaru ruling will therefore be enhanced. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 104 (11 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailDroits de l'homme et "choc des civilisations"
Delruelle, Edouard ULg

in Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l'Homme [= RTDH] (2010)

Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailL'accès au territoire et la détention de l'étranger demandeur d'asile. Note sous Saadi c. Royaume-Uni
Carlier, Jean-Yves ULg

in Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l'Homme [= RTDH] (2009), 79(3), 795-810

Detailed reference viewed: 33 (10 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailLa détention et l'expulsion collective des étrangers. Commentaire de l'affaire Conka
Carlier, Jean-Yves ULg

in Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l'Homme [= RTDH] (2003), 14(53), 198-222

Detailed reference viewed: 31 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailVers l'interdiction d'expulsion des étrangers intégrés?, note sous Cour européenne des droits de l'homme, 26 mars 1992
Carlier, Jean-Yves ULg

in Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l'Homme [= RTDH] (1993), 4(15), 449-466

Detailed reference viewed: 16 (0 ULg)