References of "Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEthique et conflits d'intérêts en droit européen de la concurrence
Petit, Nicolas ULg

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2013), (1),

The debate over the compatibility of EU competition enforcement with Article 6 ECHR is far from over. Whilst there has been a great - some would say excessive - deal of papers on due process issues, less ... [more ▼]

The debate over the compatibility of EU competition enforcement with Article 6 ECHR is far from over. Whilst there has been a great - some would say excessive - deal of papers on due process issues, less, if none attention has been paid to the rules and remedies that govern conflicts of interests amongst lawyers, civil servants, legal secretaries and Members of the Court. This short paper seeks to open the discussion on this issue. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 35 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPratiques unilatérales
Sibony, Anne-Lise ULg; Marty, Frédéric; Wachsmann, Anne

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2012), 1-2012

La Commission européenne condamne l’opérateur historique polonais de télécommunications pour avoir abusé de sa position dominante en entravant l’accès de nouveaux entrants au marché de l’Internet.

Detailed reference viewed: 27 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPratiques unilatérales
Sibony, Anne-Lise ULg; Marty, Frédéric; Wachsmann, Anne

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2012), (2-2012), 64-80

The Grand Chamber of the CJEU rules that selective rebates targeting clients of a competitor are not abusive when prices are below incremental cost but cover marginal cost and when no intent to eliminate ... [more ▼]

The Grand Chamber of the CJEU rules that selective rebates targeting clients of a competitor are not abusive when prices are below incremental cost but cover marginal cost and when no intent to eliminate competitor has been established. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 17 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPratiques unilatérales
Sibony, Anne-Lise ULg; Marty, Frédéric; Wachsmann, Anne

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2012), (3), 101-115

The CJEU rules that intent is relevant for the purposes of assessing abusive conduct

Detailed reference viewed: 8 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailInterview of Doris Hildebrand
Sibony, Anne-Lise ULg

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2012), (2), 4-8

Detailed reference viewed: 11 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPratiques unilatérales
Sibony, Anne-Lise ULg; Marty, Frédéric; Wachsmann, Anne

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2012), 4

Gains d’efficience : La Cour AELE, peu sensible à l’approche économique, rejette le pourvoi de la poste norvégienne, condamnée à 12 millions d’euros d’amendes pour avoir empêché l’accès d’entreprises ... [more ▼]

Gains d’efficience : La Cour AELE, peu sensible à l’approche économique, rejette le pourvoi de la poste norvégienne, condamnée à 12 millions d’euros d’amendes pour avoir empêché l’accès d’entreprises concurrentes au marché de la distribution de colis aux particuliers. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 17 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPratiques unilatérales
Sibony, Anne-Lise ULg

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2011), N° 2-2011

The CJEU rules that an abuse of a dominant position in the form of margin squeeze may be constituted even where intermediary services do not constitute an indispensible input for new entrants on the ... [more ▼]

The CJEU rules that an abuse of a dominant position in the form of margin squeeze may be constituted even where intermediary services do not constitute an indispensible input for new entrants on the downstream market, provided potential exclusionary effect is established. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 14 (3 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPratiques unilatérales
Sibony, Anne-Lise ULg; Marty, Frédéric; Wachsmann, Anne

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2011), N° 1-2011

The CJEU rules for the first time on a margin squeeze case and confirms that partly regulated tarifs by a dominant operator may be abusive.

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (5 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPratiques unilatérales
Sibony, Anne-Lise ULg; Marty, Frédéric; Wachsmann, Anne

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2011), 3-2011

L’avocat général Kokott est d’avis que, pour les abus consistant en une discrimination entre partenaires commerciaux, il doit être établi que la pratique de l’entreprise en position dominante crée un ... [more ▼]

L’avocat général Kokott est d’avis que, pour les abus consistant en une discrimination entre partenaires commerciaux, il doit être établi que la pratique de l’entreprise en position dominante crée un désavantage dans la concurrence pour l’un au moins des partenaires. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 9 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEnquêtes sectorielles: complément ou substitut de l'action des autorités de concurrence? Le "couteau suisse" du droit européen de la concurrence?
Petit, Nicolas ULg; Lousberg, Charlotte ULg

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2010), (2), 19-28

The present article seeks to determine whether sector inquiries are a “substitute” or a "complement” to conventional competition enforcement techniques. The analysis shows that not unlike a “Swiss knife” ... [more ▼]

The present article seeks to determine whether sector inquiries are a “substitute” or a "complement” to conventional competition enforcement techniques. The analysis shows that not unlike a “Swiss knife”, sector inquiries constitute a convenient, multifunctional tool, which serves a variety of purposes. Sector inquiries indeed entitle the Commission to (i) lower the minimal procedural requirements which must be met to launch investigations; (ii) extend the substantive scope of its inquiries beyond mere infringements to Article 101 and 102 TFEU; and (iii) incentivize firms to spontaneously comply with the antitrust rules. In light, however, of a number of shortcomings arising from the Commission’s sector inquiries’ practice, this article formulates several “best practices” (which are also relevant for other competition authorities with similar powers). [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 65 (7 ULg)
Full Text
See detailPratiques unilatérales
Sibony, Anne-Lise ULg; Wachsmann, Anne; Marty, Frédéric

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2010), 1

EU Trib., 17.12.09, Solvay/Commission, T‑57/01 ; Fr. NCA, 10.11.09, Chep France, 09-D-33 ; Fr. NCA, 26.10.09, Photomaton, 09-D-32 ; Fr. NCA, 09.12.09, Orange Caraïbe and France Télécom, 09-D-36 ; Fr. NCA ... [more ▼]

EU Trib., 17.12.09, Solvay/Commission, T‑57/01 ; Fr. NCA, 10.11.09, Chep France, 09-D-33 ; Fr. NCA, 26.10.09, Photomaton, 09-D-32 ; Fr. NCA, 09.12.09, Orange Caraïbe and France Télécom, 09-D-36 ; Fr. NCA, 10.12.09, Volvo Trucks France, 09-D-37. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 37 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailHow Much Discretion do, and should, Competition Authorities enjoy in the Course of their Enforcement Activities? A Multi-Jurisdictional Assessment
Petit, Nicolas ULg

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2010), (1), 44-62

The purpose of this study is to assess whether competition agencies (“CAs”) do, and in turn should, enjoy an unfettered discretionary power in the context of the investigation of competition law ... [more ▼]

The purpose of this study is to assess whether competition agencies (“CAs”) do, and in turn should, enjoy an unfettered discretionary power in the context of the investigation of competition law infringements or whether their margin of discretion should be subject to certain limits. To this end, it focuses on four successive areas where CAs may be entitled to make choices, i.e. detection of infringements, selection of enforcement targets, initiation of infringement proceedings and outcome of the case. Thanks to reports received from 21 national experts in response to a questionnaire covering 18 jurisdictions, the present study formulates a number of public policy proposals. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 70 (10 ULg)
Full Text
See detailPratiques unilatérales
Sibony, Anne-Lise ULg; Marty, Frédéric; Wachsmann, Anne

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2010), (3), 88-100

Eur. Comm., dec. art. 9 Reg. 1/2003, 14.04.10, Swedish Interconnectors, case COMP/39.351; CA Paris, 15.04.10, Vicat et Lafarge Ciments v. Fr. NCA, 12.03.07, Corsican cement, 07-D-08; Fr. NCA, 17.05.10 ... [more ▼]

Eur. Comm., dec. art. 9 Reg. 1/2003, 14.04.10, Swedish Interconnectors, case COMP/39.351; CA Paris, 15.04.10, Vicat et Lafarge Ciments v. Fr. NCA, 12.03.07, Corsican cement, 07-D-08; Fr. NCA, 17.05.10, Sanofi-Aventis France, 10-D-06; Fr. NCA, 16.04.10, biogas, 10-D-14 and, on appeal, CA Paris, 01.06.10, Euro Power Technology, RG 2010/07349 [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 28 (4 ULg)
Full Text
See detailLa loi belge sur la protection de la concurrence économique - Rapport d'étape après deux années d'application
Petit, Nicolas ULg; Defossez, Alexandre ULg

in Concurrences : Revue des Droits de la Concurrence (2009), 2

Detailed reference viewed: 85 (18 ULg)