Treatment of osteoporosis in men.

in BONE (2013), 53(1), 134-44

SUMMARY: Aspects of osteoporosis in men, such as screening and identification strategies, definitions of diagnosis and intervention thresholds, and treatment options (both approved and in the pipeline ... [more ▼]

SUMMARY: Aspects of osteoporosis in men, such as screening and identification strategies, definitions of diagnosis and intervention thresholds, and treatment options (both approved and in the pipeline) are discussed. INTRODUCTION: Awareness of osteoporosis in men is improving, although it remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. A European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) workshop was convened to discuss osteoporosis in men and to provide a report by a panel of experts (the authors). METHODS: A debate with an expert panel on preselected topics was conducted. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although additional fracture data are needed to endorse the clinical care of osteoporosis in men, consensus views were reached on diagnostic criteria and intervention thresholds. Empirical data in men display similarities with data acquired in women, despite pathophysiological differences, which may not be clinically relevant. Men should receive treatment at a similar 10-year fracture probability as in women. The design of mixed studies may reduce the lag between comparable treatments for osteoporosis in women becoming available in men. [less ▲]

Antidepressant medications and osteoporosis

in BONE (2012), 51

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates can inhibit angiogenesis in vivo without the involvement of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase.

in Bone (2011), 48(2), 259-66

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs) are widely used to block bone destruction associated with bone metastasis because they are effective inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. More ... [more ▼]

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs) are widely used to block bone destruction associated with bone metastasis because they are effective inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. More specifically, once internalized by osteoclasts, N-BPs block the activity of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS), a key enzyme in the mevalonate pathway. In addition to their antiresorptive activity, preclinical evidence shows that N-BPs have antiangiogenic properties. However, the exact reasons for which N-BPs inhibit angiogenesis remain largely unknown. Using different angiogenesis models, we examined here the effects of zoledronate, risedronate and three structural analogs of risedronate (NE-58025, NE-58051 and NE-10790) with lower potencies to inhibit FPPS activity. Risedronate and zoledronate were much more potent than NE-compounds at inhibiting both endothelial cell proliferation in vitro and vessel sprouting in the chicken egg chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. In addition, only risedronate and zoledronate inhibited the revascularization of the prostate gland in testosterone-stimulated castrated rats. Moreover, as opposed to NE-compounds, risedronate and zoledronate induced intracellular accumulation of isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) in endothelial cells by blocking the activity of the IPP-consuming enzyme FPPS. Thus, these results indicated that N-BPs inhibited angiogenesis in a FPPS-dependent manner. However, drug concentrations used to inhibit angiogenesis, both in vitro and in the CAM and prostate gland assays, were high. In contrast, a low concentration of risedronate (1 muM) was sufficient to inhibit blood vessel formation in the ex vivo rat aortic ring assay. Moreover, NE-58025 (which had a 7-fold lower potency than risedronate to inhibit FPPS activity) was as effective as risedronate to reduce angiogenesis in the rat aortic ring assay. In conclusion, our results suggest that low concentrations of N-BPs inhibit angiogenesis in a FPPS-independent manner, whereas higher drug concentrations were required to inhibit FPPS activity in vivo. [less ▲]

Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate versus risedronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years.

in Bone (2010), 46(2), 440-6

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated Markov microsimulation ... [more ▼]

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated Markov microsimulation model with a Belgian payer's perspective estimated the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of a 3-year strontium ranelate treatment compared with no treatment and with the bisphosphonate risedronate. Data on the effect of both treatments on fracture risk were taken from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Analyses were performed for postmenopausal women aged 75 and 80 years, either with a diagnosis of osteoporosis (i.e. bone mineral density T-score </=-2.5 SD) or with prevalent vertebral fractures (PVF). Parameter uncertainty was evaluated using both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Strontium ranelate was dominant (i.e. more effective and less costly) versus risedronate for women with osteoporosis aged over 75 years and for women with PVF aged 80 years. The cost per QALY gained of strontium ranelate compared with risedronate at 75 years of age was euro11,435 for women with PVF. When compared with no treatment, the costs per QALY gained of strontium ranelate were euro15,588 and euro7,708 at 75 and 80 years of age for women with osteoporosis; the equivalent values were euro16,518 and euro6,015 for women with PVF. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that strontium ranelate was generally more cost-effective than risedronate, in the range of 60% in all cases. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that strontium ranelate is a cost-effective strategy, in a Belgian setting, for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years. [less ▲]

Risk of fracture in women treated with monthly oral ibandronate or weekly bisphosphonates: the eValuation of IBandronate Efficacy (VIBE) database fracture study

in BONE (2009), 44

The eValuation of IBandronate Efficacy (VIBE) head-to-head database fracture study compared fracture rates between patients treated with monthly ibandronate and weekly oral bisphosphonates (BPs). This ... [more ▼]

The eValuation of IBandronate Efficacy (VIBE) head-to-head database fracture study compared fracture rates between patients treated with monthly ibandronate and weekly oral bisphosphonates (BPs). This large study included women ≥45 years old, newly prescribed monthly oral ibandronate or weekly oral alendronate or risedronate, and without malignancy or Paget's disease of bone. The primary analysis included patients who were adherent to treatment during the first 90 days after the index date. The risks of hip, nonvertebral, vertebral and any clinical fracture were compared using Cox proportional hazards models and adjusted for potential confounding factors. A secondary, “intent-to-treat” analysis included all patients who received at least one BP prescription. Sensitivity analyses based on the primary analysis compared patients receiving ibandronate with patients receiving weekly alendronate or risedronate separately, and explored the effect of excluding patients with potential confounding factors from the analysis. Further sensitivity analyses varied the requirement for adherence during the first 90 days after the index date. The primary analysis population included 7345 monthly ibandronate and 56,837 weekly BP patients. Fracture rates after the 12-month observational period were <2% and fracture risk was not significantly different between patients receiving monthly ibandronate or weekly BPs for hip, nonvertebral or any clinical fracture (adjusted relative risk: hip=1.06, p=0.84; nonvertebral=0.88, p=0.255; any clinical fracture=0.82, p=0.052). Ibandronate patients had a significantly lower risk of vertebral fracture than weekly BP patients (adjusted relative risk 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.18–0.75, p=0.006). In the secondary, “intent-to-treat” analysis, relative risks of fracture were not significantly different between treatment groups for any fracture type. The results of the sensitivity analyses were generally consistent with the primary analysis. This retrospective cohort study found that patients treated with oral monthly ibandronate or weekly BPs (alendronate and risedronate) had similar, low risks of hip fracture, nonvertebral fracture and any clinical fracture. Ibandronate patients had a significantly lower relative risk of vertebral fracture than weekly BP patients; the clinical implications of these findings require further exploration and validation. [less ▲]

Role of Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover as Prognostic Indicator of Successful Osteoporosis Therapy

in BONE (2008), 42

Most of the currently available anti-osteoporosis medications promptly and significantly influence the rate of bone turnover. Biochemical markers of bone turnover now provide a high sensitivity to change ... [more ▼]

Most of the currently available anti-osteoporosis medications promptly and significantly influence the rate of bone turnover. Biochemical markers of bone turnover now provide a high sensitivity to change, allowing the detection of these bone turnover changes within a couple of weeks. Since the anti-fracture efficacy of inhibitors of bone resorption or stimulators of bone formation appears to be largely independent of baseline bone turnover, biochemical markers do not appear to play a significant role in the selection of one particular drug, for an individual patient. However, there are consistent data showing that short-term changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover may be significant predictors of future changes in bone mineral density or fracture reduction, hence suggesting that bone turnover markers play a significant role in the monitoring of anti-osteoporosis therapy. [less ▲]

The role of calcium and vitamin D in the management of osteoporosis.

in BONE (2008), 42(2), 246-9

The role of calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of osteoporosis has been extensively studied. The aim of this paper was to reach, where possible, consensus views on five key questions ... [more ▼]

The role of calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of osteoporosis has been extensively studied. The aim of this paper was to reach, where possible, consensus views on five key questions relating to calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the management of osteoporosis. Whereas global strategies that target supplementation to the general population could not be justified in terms of efficacy and health economics, there is a clearer rationale for supplementing patients who are at increased risk of osteoporosis and those who have developed osteoporosis, including those already taking other treatments for osteoporosis. The combination of vitamin D with calcium may be beneficial in terms of efficacy and, perhaps, for optimising adherence. [less ▲]

Clinical evaluation of medicinal products for acceleration of fracture healing in patients with osteoporosis.

in BONE (2008), 43(2), 343-7

Pre-clinical studies indicate that pharmacologic agents can augment fracture union. If these pharmacologic approaches could be translated into clinical benefit and offered to patients with osteoporosis or ... [more ▼]

Pre-clinical studies indicate that pharmacologic agents can augment fracture union. If these pharmacologic approaches could be translated into clinical benefit and offered to patients with osteoporosis or patients with other risks for impaired fracture union (e.g. in subjects with large defects or open fractures with high complication rate), they could provide an important adjunct to the treatment of fractures. However, widely accepted guidelines are important to encourage the conduct of studies to evaluate bioactive substances, drugs, and new agents that may promote fracture union and subsequent return to normal function. A consensus process was initiated to provide recommendations for the clinical evaluation of potential therapies to augment fracture repair in patients with meta- and diaphyseal fractures. Based on the characteristics of fracture healing and fixation, the following study objectives of a clinical study may be appropriate: a) acceleration of fracture union, b) acceleration of return to normal function and c) reduction of fracture healing complications. The intended goal(s) should determine subsequent study methodology. While an acceleration of return to normal function or a reduction of fracture healing complications in and of themselves may be sufficient primary study endpoints for a phase 3 pivotal study, acceleration of fracture union alone is not. Radiographic evaluation may either occur at multiple time points during the healing process with the aim of measuring the time taken to reach a defined status (e.g. cortical bridging of three cortices or disappearance of fracture lines), or could be obtained at a single pre-determined timepoint, were patients are expected to reach a common clinical milestone (i.e. pain free full weight-bearing in weight-bearing fracture cases). Validated Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO's) measures will need to support the return to normal function co-primary endpoints. If reduction of complication rate (e.g. non-union) is the primary objective, the anticipated complications must be defined in the study protocol, along with their possible associations with the specified fracture type and fixation device. The study design should be randomized, parallel, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, and all fracture subjects should receive a standardized method of fracture fixation, defined as Standard of Care. [less ▲]

Pharmacological effects of tiludronate in horses after long-term immobilization

in BONE (2007), 41(3), 414-421

Introduction: Tiludronate, a bisphosphonate, has recently been introduced in veterinary medicine to treat orthopedic conditions in the horse. This study was designed to evaluate its effects on biochemical ... [more ▼]

Introduction: Tiludronate, a bisphosphonate, has recently been introduced in veterinary medicine to treat orthopedic conditions in the horse. This study was designed to evaluate its effects on biochemical biomarkers of bone metabolism and on bone density and structure in an experimental model of disuse osteoporosis induced by cast application in horses. Methods: Two groups of eight horses were immobilized during 8 weeks. The first group (P-group) received a placebo, and the second group (T-group) received tiludronate 1 mg/kg by slow IV infusion. Both treatments were administered twice, 28 days apart. Immobilization consisted of stall rest with the left forelimb packed in a fiberglass cast. It was followed by a 4-week remobilization period and an 8-week standardized training protocol. One biomarker of bone resorption, the C-telopeptides of type 1 collagen cross-links (CTX-1) and one biomarker of bone formation, the bone isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP), were assessed. Metacarpus III (MCIII) bone mineral density (BMD) and speed of sound (SOS) were evaluated respectively by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and quantitative ultrasonography (QUS). Lameness was regularly assessed during the remobilization and training periods. Group- and time-related effects were tested by analysis of variance on repeated measurements. Results: A rapid, transient and significant decrease in CTX-1 concentration was seen after each treatment in the T-group only. No significant differences between groups were seen in the evolution of bone ALP activity. At the end of the experiment, the loss of MCIII BMD measured by DEXA in the immobilized limb was significantly less in the T-group than in the P-group. The MCIII SOS measured by QUS did not significantly vary within or between groups throughout the study. Discussion and conclusions: Tiludronate was found to significantly reduce bone resorption during immobilization, as well as to prevent long-term osteopenia in the immobilized limb. Disuse osteopenia did not affect the lateral superficial cortex of MCIII. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. [less ▲]

Strontium ranelate reduces the urinary level of cartilage degradation biomarker CTX-II in postmenopausal women

in BONE (2007), 40(1), 218-222

Objective: Strontium ranelate significantly decreases the risk of osteoporotic fractures. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether strontium ranclate (2 g/day) also affects cartilage ... [more ▼]

Objective: Strontium ranelate significantly decreases the risk of osteoporotic fractures. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether strontium ranclate (2 g/day) also affects cartilage brakedown as measured by urinary marker of cartilage degradation, designated CTX-II. Methods: A subgroup of 2617 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (aged 75.7 +/- 4.4 years) were selected from the TROPOS phase III study on the basis of a urinary sampling reported at each visit during the first three years of the study. When included in TROPOS, they were randomized to strontium ranelate or placebo in a double-blind fashion for 3 years. A calcium and vitamin D supplement was also provided to the subjects during the study. A marker of collagen type II degradation (CTX-II) corrected for urinary creatinine (CTX-II/cr.) was assessed at regular intervals throughout the study in 1310 patients in strontium ranelate group and 1307 patients in placebo group. Results: The response in CTX-II depended on time (p < 0.0001), and this time dependency differed statistically significantly between groups (time x treatment) (p < 0.0003). In addition, there was a statistically significant difference between treatments (p < 0.0001). The difference in the response of CTX-II/cr. appeared already after three months, with the strontium ranelate-treated subjects having approximately 15-20% lower values than the placebo-treated subjects for the remaining study period (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Treatment with strontium ranelate significantly decreases urinary excretion of CTX-II, a marker of cartilage destruction. Further studies are warranted to investigate an effect on cartilage formation and symptoms of osteoarthritis. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. [less ▲]