References of "Osteoporosis International"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPrevalence of sarcopenia in a population of nursing home residents according to their frailty status: results of the Senior cohort
Buckinx, Fanny ULiege; Reginster, Jean-Yves ULiege; Beaudart, Charlotte ULiege et al

in Osteoporosis International (2016, April), 27(supplement 1), 55-56

Detailed reference viewed: 93 (16 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe future prevalence of sarcopenia in Europe
Ethgen, Olivier ULiege; Tchoconte, C.; Beaudart, Charlotte ULiege et al

in Osteoporosis International (2016, April), 27(Supplement 1), 53-54

Detailed reference viewed: 96 (6 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailrelationship between total hip BMD T-score and incidence of nonvertebral fracture with up to 10 years of Denosumab (DMAB) treatment
Ferrari, S.; ADAMI, S.; Brown, J.P. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2016, April), 27(Supplement 1), 49-50

Detailed reference viewed: 57 (4 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailA randomized double-blind study of Denosumab (DMAB) compared with Zoledronic acid (ZOL) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis previously treated with oral bisphosphonates
Miller, P.; Pannacciulli, N.; Brown, J.P. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2016, April), 27(SUPPLEMENT1), 42

Detailed reference viewed: 91 (2 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailDeterminants of vitamin D supplementation prescription in nursing homes: a survey among general practitioners
Buckinx, Fanny ULiege; Reginster, Jean-Yves ULiege; Cavalier, Etienne ULiege et al

in Osteoporosis International (2016), 27

Abstract Summary A total of 119 GPs participated to a survey aimed to assess the profile and determinants of vitamin D supplementation prescription in nursing homes. Among the respondent GPs, 65 (54.6 ... [more ▼]

Abstract Summary A total of 119 GPs participated to a survey aimed to assess the profile and determinants of vitamin D supplementation prescription in nursing homes. Among the respondent GPs, 65 (54.6 %) systematically prescribe vitamin D to their institutionalized patients and the 54 (45.4 %) others prescribe only sometimes. Introduction The aim of this study is to assess the profile and determinants of vitamin D supplementation prescription in nursing homes. Methods General practitioners (GPs) having at least one patient in a nursing home in Liège, Belgium, were asked to complete the survey. Results A total of 119 GPs participated in the survey. Among the respondent GPs, 65 (54.6 %) systematically prescribe vitamin D to their institutionalized patients and the 54 (45.4 %) others prescribe only sometimes. The main reasons for prescribing vitamin D cited by GPs who do so systematically are as follows: because they believe nursing home residents are mostly deficient in vitamin D status (92.1 %), because they believe that vitamin D supplementation prevents osteoporotic fractures (77.8 %), and because vitamin D supplementation is recommended by various scientific societies (38.1 %). GPs who only prescribe vitamin D supplementation in some patients mainly do so following a diagnosis of osteoporosis (82.4 %), on the basis the 25(OH)D level (78.4 %), in the case of history of fracture (54.9 %) or after a recent fracture (43.4 %). Surprisingly, 16 physicians (31.4 %) only prescribe vitamin D when they think of it. Interestingly, while 40.7% of GPs always prescribe the same dose of vitamin D, the remaining 59.3 % prescribe a dose that will mainly depend on the results of the 25(OH)D level (94.0 %), the patient’s bone health (49.3 %), or history of fracture (43.3 %). Conclusions More than half of GPs systematically prescribe vitamin D to their patients living in nursing homes. The other GPs usually prescribe vitamin D following the result of the vitamin D status or after a diagnosis of osteoporosis. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 57 (33 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of personalized supplementation with vitamin D-rich dairy products in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures
Ethgen, Olivier ULiege; Hiligsmann, Mickaël; Burlet, Nansa et al

in Osteoporosis International (2016), 27

Summary: Titrated supplementations with vitamin D-fortified yogurt, based on spontaneous calcium and vitamin D intakes, can be cost-effective in postmenopausal women with or without increased risk of ... [more ▼]

Summary: Titrated supplementations with vitamin D-fortified yogurt, based on spontaneous calcium and vitamin D intakes, can be cost-effective in postmenopausal women with or without increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Introduction: The objective of this study is to assess the costeffectiveness of the vitamin D-fortified yogurt given to women with and without an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. Methods: Avalidated cost-effectiveness microsimulation Markov model of osteoporosis management was used. Three personalized supplementation scenarios to reflect the Ca/Vit D needs taking into account the well-known variations in dietary habits and a possible pharmacological supplementation in Ca/ Vit D, given above or in combination with anti-osteoporosis medications: one yogurt per day, i.e., 400 mg of Ca+200 IU of Vit D (scenario 1 U), two yogurts per day, i.e., 800 mg of Ca+ 400 IU of Vit D (scenario 2 U), or three yogurts per day, i.e., 1, 200 mg of Ca+600 IU of Vit D (scenario 3 U). Results: One yogurt is cost-effective in the general population above the age of 70 years and in all age groups in women with low bone mineral density (BMD) or prevalent vertebral fracture (PVF). The daily intake of two yogurts is cost-effective above 80 years in the general population and above 70 years in the two groups of women at increased risk of fractures. However, an intake of three yogurts per day is only cost-effective above 80 years old in the general population, as well as in women with low BMD or PVF. Conclusions: Our study is the first economic analysis supporting the cost-effectiveness of dairy products, fortified with vitamin D, in the armamentarium against osteoporotic fractures. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (7 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPotential cost-effectiveness for using patient decision aids to guide osteoporosis treatment
Penton, H; Hiligsmann, M.; Harrison, M. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2016), 27

We use a model to predict whether using a patient decision aid in patients considering bisphosphonate therapy would be a good use of health resources. We found that if the decision aid improved adherence ... [more ▼]

We use a model to predict whether using a patient decision aid in patients considering bisphosphonate therapy would be a good use of health resources. We found that if the decision aid improved adherence, and only marginally increased time physicians needed with their patients, then the decision-aid would be cost-effective. Introduction Oral bisphosphonates have been shown to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fracture. Adherence is crucial but suboptimal. A recent study suggests that a patient decision aid, which facilitates shared decision-making, could be effective in increasing adherence to bisphosphonates. But decision aids come at a cost in terms of additional time spent with physicians. This study considers the emerging evidence on the role of patient decision aids in improving adherence to bisphosphonates and their potential costs to inform future decision-making and research priorities. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (2 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailA phase IV, two-armed, randomized, cross-over study comparing compliance with once-a-month administration of vitamin D3 to compliance with daily administration of a fixed-dose combination of vitamin D3 and calcium during two 6-month periods
Bruyère, Olivier ULiege; DEROISY, Rita ULiege; Dardenne, Nadia ULiege et al

in Osteoporosis International (2015), 26(12), 2863-8

Summary In a randomized, cross-over study, once monthly administration of vitamin D3 was preferred over a once daily administration of a fixed-dose combination of vitamin D3 and calcium, with a better ... [more ▼]

Summary In a randomized, cross-over study, once monthly administration of vitamin D3 was preferred over a once daily administration of a fixed-dose combination of vitamin D3 and calcium, with a better compliance but without any significant difference in the increase in vitamin D levels. Introduction The aim of the present study was to compare a once-monthly administration of vitamin D3 to a daily administration of a fixed-dose combination of vitamin D3 and calcium during two treatment periods of 6 months. Methods One hundred volunteers aged 50 years old or older were randomized to receive either one drinkable ampoule containing 25,000 IU vitamin D3 (D-Cure®, SMB) once monthly (group VD) or one chewable tablet containing 1000 mg calcium carbonate+800 IU vitamin D3 (Steovit Forte®, Takeda) once daily (group VDCa) during 6 months. After the first 6 months of treatment, the groups were reversed according to the randomized cross-over design. Treatment compliance (i.e. the primary outcome), preference, acceptability and vitamin D levels and adverse events were all collected. Results For the two periods, the patients had a significantly higher compliance in the VD group than in the VDCa group (p<0.0001). During the study, 50 (56.8 %) patients preferred the VD treatment, 16 (18.2 %) patients preferred the VDCa, and for 22 (25.0 %) patients, neither treatment was preferred. At the end of the first 6 months of treatment, the mean (SD) increase of 25(OH)D was 6.57 ng/mL (8.19) in the VD group and 3.88 ng/mL (10.0) in the VDCa group (p=0.16 between groups). Conclusion In this study, a once-monthly administration of vitamin D3 was preferred over a once-daily administration of a fixed-dose combination of vitamin D3 and calcium, with a better compliance but without any significant difference in the increase in vitamin D levels. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 73 (20 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe effect of 8 or 5 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM Extension study.
PAPAPOULOS, S.; LIPPUNER, K.; ROUX, C. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2015), 26(12), 2773-2783

Summary: The FREEDOM study and its Extension provide long-term information about the effects of denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Treatment for up to 8 years was associated with ... [more ▼]

Summary: The FREEDOM study and its Extension provide long-term information about the effects of denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Treatment for up to 8 years was associated with persistent reduction of bone turnover, continued increases in bone mineral density, low fracture incidence, and a favorable benefit/risk profile. Introduction: This study aims to report the results through year 5 of the FREEDOM Extension study, representing up to 8 years of continued denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods : Women who completed the 3-year FREEDOM study were eligible to enter the 7-year open-label FREEDOM Extension in which all participants are scheduled to receive denosumab, since placebo assignment was discontinued for ethical reasons. A total of 4550 women enrolled in the Extension (2343 long-term; 2207 cross-over). In this analysis, women in the long-term and cross-over groups received denosumab for up to 8 and 5 years, respectively. Results Throughout the Extension, sustained reduction of bone turnover markers (BTMs) was observed in both groups. In the long-term group, mean bone mineral density (BMD) continued to increase significantly at each time point measured, for cumulative 8-year gains of 18.4 and 8.3 % at the lumbar spine and total hip, respectively. In the cross-over group, mean BMD increased significantly from the Extension baseline for 5-year cumulative gains of 13.1 and 6.2 % at the lumbar spine and total hip, respectively. The yearly incidence of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures remained low in both groups. The incidence of adverse and serious adverse events did not increase over time. Through Extension year 5, eight events of osteonecrosis of the jaw and two events of atypical femoral fracture were confirmed. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (3 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailAssessment and determinants of aesthetic discomfort in hand osteoarthritis: The Liège Hand Osteoarthritis Cohort (LICOH)
Neuprez, Audrey ULiege; Bruyère, Olivier ULiege; Dardenne, Nadia ULiege et al

in Osteoporosis International (2015, March), 26(S1), 43-44

Detailed reference viewed: 43 (30 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailDairy products & Bone Health: Turning facts and beliefs into clinical practice
Bruyère, Olivier ULiege

in Osteoporosis International (2015, March), 26(S1), 383

Detailed reference viewed: 60 (0 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPhysical rehabilitation in musculoskeletal conditions: which method?
Bruyère, Olivier ULiege

in Osteoporosis International (2015, March), 26(S1), 68

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (2 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailHow can we help implementing ESCEO algorithm in real life?
Reginster, Jean-Yves ULiege

in Osteoporosis International (2015), 26(S1), 382

Detailed reference viewed: 22 (7 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailFurther reductions in nonvertebral fracture rate with long-term denosumab treatment in the FREEDOM open-label extension and influence of hip bone mineral density after 3 years.
FERRARI, S.; ADACHI, J.D.; LUPPUNER, K. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2015), 26

Limited data exist on the efficacy of long-term therapies for osteoporosis. In osteoporotic postmenopausal women receiving denosumab for 7 years, nonvertebral fracture rates significantly decreased in ... [more ▼]

Limited data exist on the efficacy of long-term therapies for osteoporosis. In osteoporotic postmenopausal women receiving denosumab for 7 years, nonvertebral fracture rates significantly decreased in years 4–7 versus years 1–3. This is the first demonstration of a further benefit on fracture outcomes with long-term therapy for osteoporosis. Introduction This study aimed to evaluate whether denosumab treatment continued beyond 3 years is associated with a further reduction in nonvertebral fracture rates. Methods Participants who completed the 3-year placebocontrolled Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis every 6 Months (FREEDOM) study were invited to participate in an open-label extension. The present analysis includes 4,074 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (n=2,343 long-term; n=1,731 cross-over) who enrolled in the extension, missed ≤1 dose during their first 3 years of denosumab treatment, and continued into the fourth year of treatment. Comparison of nonvertebral fracture rates during years 1–3 of denosumab with that of the fourth year and with the rate during years 4–7 was evaluated. Results For the combined group, the nonvertebral fracture rate per 100 participant-years was 2.15 for the first 3 years of denosumab treatment (referent) and 1.36 in the fourth year (rate ratio [RR]=0.64; 95 % confidence interval (CI)=0.48 to 0.85, p=0.003). Comparable findings were observed in the groups separately and when nonvertebral fracture rates during years 1–3 were compared to years 4–7 in the longterm group (RR=0.79; 95 % CI=0.62 to 1.00, p=0.046). Fracture rate reductions in year 4 were most prominent in subjects with persisting low hip bone mineral density (BMD). Conclusions Denosumab treatment beyond 3 years was associated with a further reduction in nonvertebral fracture rate that persisted through 7 years of continuous denosumab administration. The degree to which denosumab further reduces nonvertebral fracture risk appears influenced by the hip bone density achieved with initial therapy [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 28 (6 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe position of Strontium ranelate in today's management of osteoporosis
Reginster, Jean-Yves ULiege; Brandi, M.L; Cannata-Andia, J. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2015), 26

Osteoporosis accounts for about 3 % of total European health-care spending. The low proportion of costs for the pharmacological prevention of osteoporotic fracture means that it is highly cost saving ... [more ▼]

Osteoporosis accounts for about 3 % of total European health-care spending. The low proportion of costs for the pharmacological prevention of osteoporotic fracture means that it is highly cost saving, especially in patient with severe osteoporosis or patients who cannot take certain osteoporosis medications due to issues of contraindications or tolerability. Following recent regulatory changes, strontium ranelate is now indicated in patients with severe osteoporosis for whom treatment with other osteoporosis treatments is not possible, and without contraindications including uncontrolled hypertension, established, current or past history of ischaemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and/or cerebrovascular disease. We review here today’s evidence for the safety and efficacy of strontium ranelate. The efficacy of strontium ranelate in patients complying with the new prescribing information (i.e. severe osteoporosis without contraindications) has been explored in a multivariate analysis of clinical trial data, which concluded that the antifracture efficacy of strontiumranelate is maintained in patients with severe osteoporosis without contraindications and also demonstrated how the new target population mitigates risk. Strontium ranelate is therefore an important alternative in today’s management of osteoporosis, with a positive benefit-risk balance, provided that the revised indication and contraindications are followed and cardiovascular risk is monitored. The bone community should be reassured that there remain viable alternatives in patients in whom treatment with other agents is not possible and protection against the debilitating effects of fracture is still feasible in patients with severe osteoporosis. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 107 (9 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailIs there a specific pattern of lean/fat mass ratio in sarcopenic subjects?
Beaudart, Charlotte ULiege; Reginster, Jean-Yves ULiege; Croisier, Jean-Louis ULiege et al

in Osteoporosis International (2015), 26(S1), 145-146

Detailed reference viewed: 41 (6 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailGlucosamine and chondroitin salts in the management of osteoarthritis in Europe
Reginster, Jean-Yves ULiege

in Osteoporosis International (2015), 26(S1), 60-61

Detailed reference viewed: 91 (4 ULiège)