References of "Dialogue : Canadian Philosophical Review = Dialogue : Revue Canadienne de Philosophie"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPenser l'espace d'après le "Parménide"
Gavray, Marc-Antoine ULg

in Dialogue : Canadian Philosophical Review = Dialogue : Revue Canadienne de Philosophie (2014)

Detailed reference viewed: 20 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailLa critique néokantienne de Kant et l'instauration d'une théorie descriptiviste de la perception
Dewalque, Arnaud ULg

in Dialogue : Canadian Philosophical Review = Dialogue : Revue Canadienne de Philosophie (2010), 49(3), 413-433

This paper contributes to explore the historical background of contemporary conceptualism. It suggests that a step forward toward a more promising understanding of this historical background can be made ... [more ▼]

This paper contributes to explore the historical background of contemporary conceptualism. It suggests that a step forward toward a more promising understanding of this historical background can be made if we focus, not on the much-discussed, controversial position of Kant, but rather on the straightforward position of some main representatives of classical neo-Kantianism. My main hypothesis is that criticisms of Kant’s transcendantal aesthetics coming from Paul Natorp (1854–1924) and Bruno Bauch (1877–1942) may be regarded as a significant historical source for the so-called “content” conceptualism (especially in McDowell’s version), insofar as they imply that the contents of perception are conceptual contents. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 48 (5 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPeut-on fonder l'arithmétique sur la logique pure? La controverse entre Natorp et Rickert
Dewalque, Arnaud ULg

in Dialogue : Canadian Philosophical Review = Dialogue : Revue Canadienne de Philosophie (2007), 46(1, Winter), 43-68

In this article, I try to shed light on the (Fregean) project of a logic of arithmetic—as discussed by Natorp and Rickert—by outlining three main ques- tions. Is the number a logical object? Is arithmetic ... [more ▼]

In this article, I try to shed light on the (Fregean) project of a logic of arithmetic—as discussed by Natorp and Rickert—by outlining three main ques- tions. Is the number a logical object? Is arithmetic reducible to logic? Is it possible to deduce the arithmetical operations from purely logical laws? I argue that rigorous distinction between these three questions makes it possible to elucidate many prob- lems affecting the program of a logic of arithmetic. The Neo-Kantian contribution to this program is at the same time considered in a new light. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 9 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailC. Stumpf, Renaissance de la philosophie. Quatre articles. Traduction et introduction par D. Fisette
Boccaccini, Federico ULg

in Dialogue : Canadian Philosophical Review = Dialogue : Revue Canadienne de Philosophie (2007)

Detailed reference viewed: 10 (3 ULg)
Full Text
See detailE. Dufour, Les néokantiens. Valeur et vérité, Paris, Vrin, 2003.
Dewalque, Arnaud ULg

in Dialogue : Canadian Philosophical Review = Dialogue : Revue Canadienne de Philosophie (2005), 44(1, Winter), 169-172

Detailed reference viewed: 22 (6 ULg)