References of "Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Peer Reviewed
See detailFree movement of goods
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege; Van den Bogaert, Stefaan

in Ambtenbrink, Fabian; Curtin, Deirdre; De Witte, Bruno (Eds.) et al The Law of the European Union (in press)

This chapter offers a 60 pages overview of the case law on the free movement of goods. It detects the trends underlying the Court's case law and assembles all relevant data on the subject matter.

Detailed reference viewed: 24 (0 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailLe droit de l’Union européenne face à l’économie collaborative
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

in Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen (in press), (3),

La présente contribution a pour objectif de proposer un état de lieux de l’incidence du droit de l’Union européenne sur le développement, la promotion et la règlementation de l’économie collaborative au ... [more ▼]

La présente contribution a pour objectif de proposer un état de lieux de l’incidence du droit de l’Union européenne sur le développement, la promotion et la règlementation de l’économie collaborative au sein du marché intérieur. Pour ce faire, cet article se divise en deux parties. Dans la première partie, le phénomène de l’économie collaborative ainsi que les approches réglementaires envisagées par les institutions de l’Union européenne pour mieux encadrer cette économie seront analysés. Nous soulignerons que l’Union européenne décide pour l’instant de ne pas proposer de nouveaux instruments de réglementation, préférant plutôt interpréter les instruments et dispositions déjà existants du droit de l’Union européenne. S’inscrivant dans cette approche, la deuxième partie de la contribution dressera une cartographie des dispositions pertinentes du droit de l’Union européenne qui gouvernent l’économie collaborative, en proposant des lignes directrices supplémentaires qui devraient permettre d’encore mieux intégrer l’économie collaborative dans le cadre juridique de l’Union européenne. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 40 (5 ULiège)
Peer Reviewed
See detailEU post-crisis economic and financial market regulation: embedding Member States’ interests within ‘more Europe’
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

in Varju, Marton (Ed.) Between compliance and particularism: Member State interests and European Union law (2018)

In the wake of financial and economic crises, the European Union took unprecedented steps to build an institutional framework accompanying financial market governance. This chapter will outline the EU law ... [more ▼]

In the wake of financial and economic crises, the European Union took unprecedented steps to build an institutional framework accompanying financial market governance. This chapter will outline the EU law techniques used to integrate Member States’ interests in the set-up and functioning of that framework. Following a brief overview and recapitulation of the ‘more Europe’ developments having taken shape in the wake of crisis, the chapter will proceed in summarising how Member States’ interests have been embedded directly within the post-crisis EU regulation framework. It will be submitted that two different and complementary kinds of ‘interest inclusion’ techniques can be distilled, more or less explicitly, within the newly created financial market supervision frameworks. The inclusion and presumed safeguarding of Member States’ interests by virtue of administrative law tools is not entirely unproblematic. The final section of the chapter highlights challenges associated with such interest-inclusion approach and questions whether the a modest way forward in an attempt better to legitimate the current interest inclusion techniques by the EU institutions. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 33 (1 ULiège)
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe roles of competition law in digital single market regulation: lessons (not) to learn from other regulated industries?
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

in Rusu, Catalin; Veenbrink, Marc; Looijestein-Clearie, Anne (Eds.) Digital markets in the European Union (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 21 (0 ULiège)
See detailThe EU's digital single market strategy: Fundamental free movement rights under pressure?
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

Scientific conference (2017, December 08)

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (1 ULiège)
See detailHarmful tax competition within the European Union: from tax rulings to financial transaction taxes
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

Scientific conference (2017, November 24)

In this presentation, I will outline how the EU constitutional framework reacts against harmful tax competition, in addition to showcasing the limits and negative consequences of that approach.

Detailed reference viewed: 25 (1 ULiège)
See detailL’auto-évaluation dans l’application des exceptions en droit économique de l’UE : plusieurs acteurs, nouveaux risques ?
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

Scientific conference (2017, October 12)

In this presentation, I will analyse the role of self-evaluation techniques in EU internal market and competition law.

Detailed reference viewed: 15 (0 ULiège)
See detailFavoriser l'acquisition de logements par les indigènes, est-ce discriminatoire?
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

Diverse speeche and writing (2017)

In this interview, I comment on the new proposal for a Flemish decree 'habiter dans sa propre région', analysing the pitfalls and difficulties it may generate from an EU internal market law point of view.

Detailed reference viewed: 14 (0 ULiège)
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe EP’s ‘European Standards’ Resolution in the wake of James Elliott Construction: carving ever more holes in Pandora’s Box?
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege; Demoulin, Iris ULiege

E-print/Working paper (2017)

This blogpost analyses a recent Parliamentary resolution against the background of the Court of Justice's James Elliott Construction judgment, dealing with the legal nature of harmonised technical ... [more ▼]

This blogpost analyses a recent Parliamentary resolution against the background of the Court of Justice's James Elliott Construction judgment, dealing with the legal nature of harmonised technical standards in EU free movement law. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 18 (0 ULiège)
See detailRéflexions sur la vie et la carrière de M. Pierre Pescatore
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

Scientific conference (2017, September 20)

In this presentation, I offered an overview of the life, career and lasting impact of the scholarship and practice of M. Pierre Pescatore, former judge at the Court of Justice of the European Union and ... [more ▼]

In this presentation, I offered an overview of the life, career and lasting impact of the scholarship and practice of M. Pierre Pescatore, former judge at the Court of Justice of the European Union and professor at the University of Liège. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 15 (0 ULiège)
Full Text
See detailLa normalisation européenne après l’arrêt James Elliott Construction du 27 octobre 2016 : la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne a-t-elle élargi ses compétences d’interprétation ?
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege; Demoulin, Iris ULiege

in Revue de la Faculté de Droit de l'Université de Liège (2017), (2),

Malgré son importance pratique, le processus de normalisation européenne a jusqu’à présent été relativement épargné par la Cour de justice. Toutefois, dans son arrêt James Elliott Construction du 27 ... [more ▼]

Malgré son importance pratique, le processus de normalisation européenne a jusqu’à présent été relativement épargné par la Cour de justice. Toutefois, dans son arrêt James Elliott Construction du 27 octobre 2016, la Cour s’est penchée directement sur le statut juridique des normes techniques européennes. Confirmant que l’interprétation des normes techniques harmonisées, actes non contraignantes, peut être soumise à un examen jurisprudentiel, la Cour a assimilé ces normes adoptées par des organismes privés à des actes des institutions de l’Union européenne. Cet article analyse les impacts de cet arrêt sur le cadre institutionnel de la normalisation européenne. Une telle analyse permettra de conclure que la Cour a interprété ses compétences d’interprétation extensivement afin de rendre possible plus directe son implication dans cette matière. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 44 (9 ULiège)
See detailFrom internal experts to external interlocutors? EU agencies and procedures assessing the equivalence of third country legal rules with EU regulatory standards
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

Scientific conference (2017, June 28)

this paper will offer an overview of procedures allowing EU agencies to determine the equivalence of third country regulatory regimes and conceptualise the accountability challenges they pose. Proceeding ... [more ▼]

this paper will offer an overview of procedures allowing EU agencies to determine the equivalence of third country regulatory regimes and conceptualise the accountability challenges they pose. Proceeding in three parts, the first part will identify and classify the different third country equivalence procedures in place. Analysing the legal basis for agency intervention and the specific powers granted to the respective agencies in that respect, this part will allow to develop a topology of two different equivalence roles conferred on EU agencies. Building upon this descriptive analysis, the second part will identify two accountability challenges associated with each of the identified third country equivalence procedure categories. Seeking to overcome those challenges, the third part of the paper will make four pointed suggestions aimed at recognising explicitly and in a more centralised way the external action powers conferred on EU agencies. Doing so would at the very least allow better to tailor modifications to the external action frameworks against the background of which existing equivalence procedures currently already implicitly operate. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 11 (1 ULiège)
See detailPanel moderator: enforcement and remedies
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

Scientific conference (2017, June 17)

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (0 ULiège)
See detailNCA independence in the context of EU Regulation 1/2003: time to take incongruent accountability realities (more) seriously?
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

Scientific conference (2017, June 16)

This paper argues that the Commission’s reform suggestions aimed at streamlining NCAs into independent administrative agencies appear to neglect this variety of accountability mechanisms underlying ... [more ▼]

This paper argues that the Commission’s reform suggestions aimed at streamlining NCAs into independent administrative agencies appear to neglect this variety of accountability mechanisms underlying current NCA institutional organisation and functioning. Given that those mechanisms each harbour incongruent expectations regarding the organisation and functioning of independent NCAs, failure to acknowledge such incongruence may in practice lead to less effective competition law enforcement. The purpose of this paper is therefore to uncover the different NCA independence perspectives underlying those accountability mechanisms and to look for legally sound ways to make them converge when designing or upgrading NCA independence in the context of the Regulation 1/2003 reform. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 6 (0 ULiège)
See detailLegal presumptions of fault in the wake of the transposition of Directive 2014/104/EU
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

Scientific conference (2017, June 14)

This paper looks at the role played by legal presumptions in the transposition of the directive on damages and whether this differs from the use of legal presumptions in other contexts of EU competition ... [more ▼]

This paper looks at the role played by legal presumptions in the transposition of the directive on damages and whether this differs from the use of legal presumptions in other contexts of EU competition law enforcement. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 29 (1 ULiège)
See detailThe roles of competition law in a regulated digital market environment: lessons (not) to learn from related fields of EU regulation
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

Scientific conference (2017, June 09)

Within the framework of its Digital Single Market (DSM) agenda, the European Union proposes the adoption of new legislative proposals aimed at removing remaining obstacles to digital transactions ... [more ▼]

Within the framework of its Digital Single Market (DSM) agenda, the European Union proposes the adoption of new legislative proposals aimed at removing remaining obstacles to digital transactions. Proposals relate to the abolition of geo-blocking as well as data and copyright portability. Complementing competition law provisions, those initiatives would seek to create the conditions for a competitive e-commerce environment within the EU internal market. In doing so, the Commission implicitly but clearly seeks to replicate a regulatory and policy approach it had taken already from the 1990s onwards when liberalising the energy and electronic communication sectors. It can be submitted that the European Commission, in proposing its DSM regulation strategy and in setting the terms of its e-commerce sector inquiry, has paid insufficient attention so far to the various and complementary roles competition law can play in a more strictly regulated market environment. In an attempt to clarify the scope and role of EU competition law and its enforcement in a digital single market environment and to guarantee its coherent application with the proposed DSM regulations, this paper will reflect on the roles competition law can our should still play in this context. Proceeding in three parts, the first part of the paper will chart the interaction between competition law and market regulation proposals in the EU’s DSM context. Using examples from the geo-blocking, data portability and copyright proposals made, this part highlights how the EU institutions perceive the interaction between competition law provisions and market regulation in this context. On the basis of that analysis, the second part will frame the interaction between competition law and market regulation as perceived in the DSM strategy, by comparing it with earlier examples in the realm of energy and electronic communications. In doing so, this part will identify two important similarities (breaking up barriers to trade and facilitating cross-border competition) as well as two fundamental differences (absence of natural monopolies and of intensely state regulated sectors). Acknowledging those similarities and differences, it will be submitted, allows better to conceptualise the role of competition law in the particular DSM context. To that extent, the third part will present and analyse the tenability of three possible roles competition law can still play against this background. Assessing the advantages and limits of each approach, that part will invite the Commission to take a clearer stance regarding the choice of one of them. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 44 (0 ULiège)
Full Text
See detailDroit matériel de l'Union européenne - libertés de circulation et marché intérieur
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

Book published by Larcier (2017)

L'ouvrage introduit étudiants et praticiens aux fondements du droit du marché intérieur européen. L’analyse juridique se structure pédagogiquement autour des schémas de raisonnement simples et des ... [more ▼]

L'ouvrage introduit étudiants et praticiens aux fondements du droit du marché intérieur européen. L’analyse juridique se structure pédagogiquement autour des schémas de raisonnement simples et des tableaux récapitulatifs clairs. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 45 (12 ULiège)
See detailRoundtable moderator: Global Competition amongst Standard Setting Organizations
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

Scientific conference (2017, May 30)

I chaired/moderated and guided a discussion between A. Chaouat (Technicolor), A. Ganesh (CEN/CENELEC), Y. Meniere (European Patent Office) and S. Haber (Stanford University). I prepared an introductory ... [more ▼]

I chaired/moderated and guided a discussion between A. Chaouat (Technicolor), A. Ganesh (CEN/CENELEC), Y. Meniere (European Patent Office) and S. Haber (Stanford University). I prepared an introductory statement and questions for each panelist, in addition to moderating the discussion. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 12 (1 ULiège)
Peer Reviewed
See detailWhat should be forgotten? Time to make sense of Article 17 GDPR from the point of view of data controllers
Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ULiege

E-print/Working paper (2017)

This blog post highlights a key gap in the interpretation and envisaged application of the EU's right to be forgotten, as introduced in the General Data Protection Regulation.

Detailed reference viewed: 41 (3 ULiège)