References of "Rovati, L"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailGlucosamine sulphate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: cost-effectiveness comparison with paracetamol.
Scholtissen, S.; Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Neuprez, A. et al

in International Journal of Clinical Practice (2010), 64(6), 756-62

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to explore the cost-effectiveness of glucosamine sulphate (GS) compared with paracetamol and placebo (PBO) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. For this purpose ... [more ▼]

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to explore the cost-effectiveness of glucosamine sulphate (GS) compared with paracetamol and placebo (PBO) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. For this purpose, a 6-month time horizon and a health care perspective was used. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cost and effectiveness data were derived from Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index data of the Glucosamine Unum In Die (once-a-day) Efficacy trial study by Herrero-Beaumont et al. Clinical effectiveness was converted into utility scores to allow for the computation of cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) For the three treatment arms Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio were calculated and statistical uncertainty was explored using a bootstrap simulation. RESULTS: In terms of mean utility score at baseline, 3 and 6 months, no statistically significant difference was observed between the three groups. When considering the mean utility score changes from baseline to 3 and 6 months, no difference was observed in the first case but there was a statistically significant difference from baseline to 6 months with a p-value of 0.047. When comparing GS with paracetamol, the mean baseline incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was dominant and the mean ICER after bootstrapping was -1376 euro/QALY indicating dominance (with 79% probability). When comparing GS with PBO, the mean baseline and after bootstrapping ICER were 3617.47 and 4285 euro/QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of the present cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that GS is a highly cost-effective therapy alternative compared with paracetamol and PBO to treat patients diagnosed with primary knee OA. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 48 (11 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEffect of glucosamine sulfate on newly proposed/recommended clinical trial end-points in patients with knee osteoarthritis
Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Giacovelli, G.; Pavelka, K. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2006, March), 17(Suppl.1), 13

Detailed reference viewed: 6 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailRecommandations for the registration of drugs used in the treatment of osteoarthritis : an update on biochemical markers
Vignon, E; Gamero, P; Delmas, P et al

in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (2001), 9

Detailed reference viewed: 7 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCorrect regimen of fluoride and calcium reduces the risk of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis
Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg; Rovati, L; Setnikar, I

in Osteoporosis International (2001), 12

Detailed reference viewed: 5 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCartilage degradation in knee osteoarthritis patients with elevated levels of urinary collagen type II C-telopeptide fragments
Christgau, S; Henrotin, Yves ULg; Enriksen, D et al

in Arthritis and Rheumatism (2000), 43(S1), 1243

Detailed reference viewed: 7 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailRecommendations for registration of drugs used in the treatment of osteoarthritis
Dougados, M; Devogelaer, JP; Annefeldt, M et al

in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (1996), 55

Detailed reference viewed: 4 (1 ULg)