References of "Papapoulos, S"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEight years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the first five years of the freedom extension
Papapoulos, S; Lippuner, K; Roux, C et al

in Osteoporosis International (2014), 25(2), 46-47

Detailed reference viewed: 25 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailDenosumab treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis for 6 years : results from the first 3 years of the freedom extension
Papapoulos, S; Brown, JP; Chapurlat, R et al

in Osteoporosis International (2012, March), 23(S2), 76

Detailed reference viewed: 78 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailFive years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: Results from the first two years of the FREEDOM extension.
Papapoulos, S.; Chapurlat, R.; Libanati, C. et al

in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (2012), 27(3), 694-701

The 3-year FREEDOM trial assessed the efficacy and safety of 60 mg denosumab every 6 months for treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Participants who completed FREEDOM were eligible to ... [more ▼]

The 3-year FREEDOM trial assessed the efficacy and safety of 60 mg denosumab every 6 months for treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Participants who completed FREEDOM were eligible to enter an extension to continue the evaluation of denosumab efficacy and safety for up to 10 years. For the extension results presented here, women from the FREEDOM denosumab group had 2 more years of denosumab treatment (long-term group) and those from the FREEDOM placebo group had 2 years of denosumab exposure (cross-over group). We report results for bone turnover markers (BTMs), bone mineral density (BMD), fractures rates, and safety. A total of 4550 women enrolled in the extension (2343 long-term; 2207 cross-over). Reductions in BTMs were maintained (long-term group) or occurred rapidly (cross-over group) following denosumab administration. In the long-term group, lumbar spine and total hip BMD increased further, resulting in 5-year gains of 13.7% and 7.0%, respectively. In the cross-over group, BMD increased at the lumbar spine (7.7%) and total hip (4.0%) during the 2-year denosumab treatment. Yearly fracture incidences for both groups were below rates observed in the FREEDOM placebo group and below rates projected for a "virtual untreated twin" cohort. Adverse events did not increase with long-term denosumab administration. Two adverse events in the cross-over group were adjudicated as consistent with osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). Five-year denosumab treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis maintained BTM reduction and increased BMD, and was associated with low fracture rates and a favorable risk/benefit profile. (c) 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 27 (6 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailManagement of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis
Rizzoli, R.; Adachi, J. D.; Cooper, C. et al

in Calcified Tissue International (2012), 91(4), 225-243

This review summarizes the available evidence-based data that form the basis for therapeutic intervention and covers the current status of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) management, regulatory ... [more ▼]

This review summarizes the available evidence-based data that form the basis for therapeutic intervention and covers the current status of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) management, regulatory requirements, and risk-assessment options. Glucocorticoids are known to cause bone loss and fractures, yet many patients receiving or initiating glucocorticoid therapy are not appropriately evaluated and treated. An European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis workshop was convened to discuss GIOP management and to provide a report by a panel of experts. An expert panel reviewed the available studies that discussed approved therapeutic agents, focusing on randomized and controlled clinical trials reporting on bone mineral density and/or fracture risk of at least 48 weeks' duration. There is no evidence that GIOP and postmenopausal osteoporosis respond differently to treatments. The FRAX algorithm can be adjusted according to glucocorticoid dose. Available antiosteoporotic therapies such as bisphosphonates and teriparatide are efficacious in GIOP management. Several other agents approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis may become available for GIOP. It is advised to stop antiosteoporotic treatment after glucocorticoid cessation, unless the patient remains at increased risk of fracture. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation as an osteoporosis-prevention measure is less effective than specific antiosteoporotic treatment. Fracture end-point studies and additional studies investigating specific subpopulations (pediatric, premenopausal, or elderly patients) would strengthen the evidence base and facilitate the development of intervention thresholds and treatment guidelines. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 15 (5 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailRelationship between changes in bone mineral density and incidence of fracture with 6 years of Denosumab treatment
Bolognese, MA; Miller, PD; Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg et al

in Arthritis and Rheumatism (2012), 64(S10), 847

Detailed reference viewed: 22 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailTreatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis for six years with denosumab : three-year results from the freedom extension
Chapurlat, R; Papapoulos, S; Brown, JP et al

in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2012), 71(3), 588

Detailed reference viewed: 27 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailFive-year Denosumab treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the first two years of the freedom trial extension
Papapoulos, S.; Man, Z.; Mellstrom, D. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2011, March), 22(Suppl.1), 107-108

Detailed reference viewed: 98 (6 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailDenosumab therapy in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis : results from the first two years of the freedom trial extension
Bone, H. G.; Chapurlat, R.; Brandi, M. L. et al

in Endocrine Reviews (2011), 32

Detailed reference viewed: 43 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailSafety observations from denosumab long-term extension and cross-over studies in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
Bone, H. G.; Chapurlat, R.; Libanati, C. et al

in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (2011), 26(S1), 22-23

Detailed reference viewed: 60 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailTraitement durant cinq ans par denosumab (DMAb) chez des femmes ménopausées ostéoporotiques : résultats d'efficacité des deux premières années de l'extension de l'essai FREEDOM
Chapurlat, R.; Roux, C.; Papapoulos, S. et al

in Revue du Rhumatisme (2011), 78(S5), 214

Detailed reference viewed: 14 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailExtended safety observations from denosumab administration in postmenopausal women from FREEDOM and FREEDOM extension trials
Brown, J. P.; Bone, H. G.; Chapurlat, R. et al

in Arthritis and Rheumatism (2011), 63(S10), 431-432

Detailed reference viewed: 20 (3 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailSubtrochanteric fractures after long-term treatment with bisphosphonates: a European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis, and International Osteoporosis Foundation Working Group Report.
Rizzoli, R.; Akesson, K.; Bouxsein, M. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2011), 22

This paper reviews the evidence for an association between atypical subtrochanteric fractures and long-term bisphosphonate use. Clinical case reports/reviews and case-control studies report this ... [more ▼]

This paper reviews the evidence for an association between atypical subtrochanteric fractures and long-term bisphosphonate use. Clinical case reports/reviews and case-control studies report this association, but retrospective phase III trial analyses show no increased risk. Bisphosphonate use may be associated with atypical subtrochanteric fractures, but the case is yet unproven. INTRODUCTION: A Working Group of the European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis and the International Osteoporosis Foundation has reviewed the evidence for a causal association between subtrochanteric fractures and long-term treatment with bisphosphonates, with the aim of identifying areas for further research and providing recommendations for physicians. METHODS: A PubMed search of literature from 1994 to May 2010 was performed using key search terms, and articles pertinent to subtrochanteric fractures following bisphosphonate use were analysed. RESULTS: Several clinical case reports and case reviews report a possible association between atypical fractures at the subtrochanteric region of the femur in bisphosphonate-treated patients. Common features of these 'atypical' fractures include prodromal pain, occurrence with minimal/no trauma, a thickened diaphyseal cortex and transverse fracture pattern. Some small case-control studies report the same association, but a large register-based study and retrospective analyses of phase III trials of bisphosphonates do not show an increased risk of subtrochanteric fractures with bisphosphonate use. The number of atypical subtrochanteric fractures in association with bisphosphonates is an estimated one per 1,000 per year. It is recommended that physicians remain vigilant in assessing their patients treated with bisphosphonates for the treatment or prevention of osteoporosis and advise patients of the potential risks. CONCLUSIONS: Bisphosphonate use may be associated with atypical subtrochanteric fractures, but the case is unproven and requires further research. Were the case to be proven, the risk-benefit ratio still remains favourable for use of bisphosphonates to prevent fractures. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (3 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailIbandronate for the prevention of nonvertebral fractures: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.
Cranney, Ann; Wells, G. A.; Yetisir, E. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2009), 20(2), 291-7

SUMMARY: This analysis was conducted to assess the effect of high versus lower doses of ibandronate on nonvertebral fractures. The results were adjusted for clinical fracture, age, and bone density. The ... [more ▼]

SUMMARY: This analysis was conducted to assess the effect of high versus lower doses of ibandronate on nonvertebral fractures. The results were adjusted for clinical fracture, age, and bone density. The treatment effect was dose-dependent. Higher doses of ibandronate significantly reduced the risk of nonvertebral fractures more effectively compared with lower doses. INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of different doses of ibandronate on nonvertebral fractures in a pooled analysis. METHODS: Eight randomized trials of ibandronate were reviewed for inclusion. Alternative definitions of high versus low doses based on annual cumulative exposure (ACE) were explored. A time-to-event analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived using Cox regression and adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: Combining higher ACE doses of > or = 10.8 mg (150 mg once monthly, 3 mg i.v. quarterly, and 2 mg i.v. every 2 months) versus ACE doses of 5.5 mg, from two trials, resulted in an HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.396-0.974, p = 0.038). There was a dose-response trend with increasing ACE doses (7.2-12 mg) versus ACE of 5.5 mg. CONCLUSIONS: A dose-response effect on nonvertebral fractures was observed when comparing high with low ACE doses. A significant reduction in nonvertebral fractures was noted when pooling data from trials using ACE doses of > or = 10.8 mg versus ACE < or = 7.2 mg; and with ACE > or = 10.8 mg versus ACE of 5.5 mg (38% reduction). Higher ibandronate dose levels (150 mg monthly or 3 mg i.v. quarterly) significantly reduced nonvertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 66 (4 ULg)