Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: results of a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.Reginster, Jean-Yves ; ; et alin Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2013), 72(2), 179-86 BACKGROUND: Strontium ranelate is currently used for osteoporosis. The international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled Strontium ranelate Efficacy in Knee OsteoarthrItis triAl evaluated its ... [more ▼] BACKGROUND: Strontium ranelate is currently used for osteoporosis. The international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled Strontium ranelate Efficacy in Knee OsteoarthrItis triAl evaluated its effect on radiological progression of knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Patients with knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or 3, and joint space width (JSW) 2.5-5 mm) were randomly allocated to strontium ranelate 1 g/day (n=558), 2 g/day (n=566) or placebo (n=559). The primary endpoint was radiographical change in JSW (medial tibiofemoral compartment) over 3 years versus placebo. Secondary endpoints included radiological progression, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and knee pain. The trial is registered (ISRCTN41323372). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population included 1371 patients. Treatment with strontium ranelate was associated with smaller degradations in JSW than placebo (1 g/day: -0.23 (SD 0.56) mm; 2 g/day: -0.27 (SD 0.63) mm; placebo: -0.37 (SD 0.59) mm); treatment-placebo differences were 0.14 (SE 0.04), 95% CI 0.05 to 0.23, p<0.001 for 1 g/day and 0.10 (SE 0.04), 95% CI 0.02 to 0.19, p=0.018 for 2 g/day. Fewer radiological progressors were observed with strontium ranelate (p<0.001 and p=0.012 for 1 and 2 g/day). There were greater reductions in total WOMAC score (p=0.045), pain subscore (p=0.028), physical function subscore (p=0.099) and knee pain (p=0.065) with strontium ranelate 2 g/day. Strontium ranelate was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with strontium ranelate 1 and 2 g/day is associated with a significant effect on structure in patients with knee osteoarthritis, and a beneficial effect on symptoms for strontium ranelate 2 g/day. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 1 (1 ULg) Structure modifying effects of strontium ranelate in knee osteoarthritisReginster, Jean-Yves ; ; et alin Osteoporosis International (2012, March), 23(S2), 58-59 Detailed reference viewed: 109 (5 ULg) Strontium ranelate reduces the number of radiological or radioclinical progressors in patients with primary knee osteoarthritisReginster, Jean-Yves ; ; et alin Osteoporosis International (2012, March), 23(S2), 366-367 Detailed reference viewed: 40 (2 ULg) Strontium ranelate in knee osteoarthritis trial (SEKOIA) : a structural and symptomatic efficacyReginster, Jean-Yves ; ; et alin Arthritis and Rheumatism (2012), 64(S10), 681 Detailed reference viewed: 35 (1 ULg) Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis : a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled international trial; ; et al in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2012), 71(3), 693 Detailed reference viewed: 19 (1 ULg) Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee ostoarthritis : a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled international trialReginster, Jean-Yves ; ; et alin Osteoporosis International (2011), 22(S5), 742-743 Detailed reference viewed: 41 (1 ULg) Metallo-beta-lactamases as emerging resistance determinants in Gram-negative pathogens: open issues; ; et al in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (2007), 29(4), 380-388 The rapid spread of acquired metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) among major Gram-negative pathogens is a matter of particular concern worldwide and primarily in Europe, one of first continents where the ... [more ▼] The rapid spread of acquired metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) among major Gram-negative pathogens is a matter of particular concern worldwide and primarily in Europe, one of first continents where the emergence of acquired MBLs has been reported and possibly the geographical area where the increasing diversity of these enzymes and the number of bacterial species affected are most impressive. This spread has not been paralleled by accuracy/standardisation of detection methods, completeness of epidemiological knowledge or a clear understanding of what MBL production entails in terms of clinical impact, hospital infection control and antimicrobial chemotherapy. A number of European experts in the field met to review the current knowledge on this phenomenon, to point out open issues and to reinforce and relate to one another the existing activities set forth by research institutes, scientific societies and European Union-driven networks. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 17 (0 ULg) Lumiracoxib is effective in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a 13 week, randomised, double blind study versus placebo and celecoxib; ; Reginster, Jean-Yves et alin Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2004), 63(11), 1419-1426 Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of lumiracoxib with placebo and celecoxib for osteoarthritis (OA) in a 13 week, multicentre, randomised, double blind study. Methods: After a 327 day washout ... [more ▼] Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of lumiracoxib with placebo and celecoxib for osteoarthritis (OA) in a 13 week, multicentre, randomised, double blind study. Methods: After a 327 day washout period for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 1702 patients with knee OA were randomised to lumiracoxib 200 or 400 mg once daily (od), celecoxib 200 mg od, or placebo (2:2:2:1). A visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity greater than or equal to40 mm was required. Primary efficacy variables were OA pain intensity (VAS mm) in the target knee, patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS mm), and WOMAC pain subscale and total scores at 13 weeks. OA pain intensity, patient's and physician's global assessment of disease activity, and WOMAC (total and all subscale scores) were analysed by visit as secondary variables. Results: Lumiracoxib showed significant improvements in all primary and secondary variables compared with placebo. Lumiracoxib 200 mg od and celecoxib 200 mg od achieved similar improvements in OA pain intensity and functional status. Lumiracoxib 400 mg od demonstrated better efficacy for OA pain intensity and patient's global assessment of disease activity at weeks 2, 4, and 8 and similar efficacy at week 13 compared with celecoxib 200 mg od. The incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs was similar in each group. Conclusion: Lumiracoxib demonstrated significant improvement in OA pain intensity, patient's global assessment of disease activity, and the WOMAC pain subscale and total scores compared with placebo. Lumiracoxib was well tolerated in this study, with overall tolerability similar to that of placebo and celecoxib. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 27 (4 ULg) |
||