References of "Moranne, Olivier"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailMDRD Versus CKD_EPI equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplant recipients
masson, Ingrid; Flamant, Martin; Maillard, Nicolas et al

in Transplantation (2013), 95(10),

Background. The new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine-based equation was developed to address the systematic underestimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by ... [more ▼]

Background. The new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine-based equation was developed to address the systematic underestimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation in patients with a relatively well-preserved kidney function. The performance of the new equation for kidney transplant recipients is discussed. Methods. We analyzed the performances of the CKD-EPI equation in comparison with the MDRD Study equation in 825 stable kidney transplant recipients. Bias, precision, and accuracy within 30% of true GFR were determined. GFR was measured by urinary clearance of inulin (n=488) and plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA (n=337). Results. Mean measured GFR (mGFR) was 50T19 mL/min/1.73 m2. On the whole cohort, bias was significantly lower for MDRD Study equation compared with CKD-EPI creatinine. This superiority translates into a better accuracy (80% and 74% for the MDRD and CKD-EPI creatinine, respectively). The best performance of the MDRD Study equation is confirmed both in the subgroups of patients with mGFR G60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and between 60 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. For mGFR 990 mL/min/1.73 m2, there were no significant differences between the two equations in terms of performance. Conclusions. The CKD-EPI creatinine equation does not offer a better GFR prediction in renal transplant patients compared with the MDRD Study equation, even in the earlier CKD stages. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 14 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailMDRD versus CKD-EPI equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplant recipients
Masson, Ingrid; Flamant, Martin; Maillard, Nicolas et al

in Transplantation (2013), 95(10), 1211-1217

Background. The new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine-based equation was developed to address the systematic underestimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by ... [more ▼]

Background. The new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine-based equation was developed to address the systematic underestimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation in patients with a relatively well-preserved kidney function. The performance of the new equation for kidney transplant recipients is discussed. Methods. We analyzed the performances of the CKD-EPI equation in comparison with the MDRD Study equation in 825 stable kidney transplant recipients. Bias, precision, and accuracy within 30% of true GFR were determined. GFR was measured by urinary clearance of inulin (n=488) and plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA (n=337). Results. Mean measured GFR (mGFR) was 50T19 mL/min/1.73 m2. On the whole cohort, bias was significantly lower for MDRD Study equation compared with CKD-EPI creatinine. This superiority translates into a better accuracy (80% and 74% for the MDRD and CKD-EPI creatinine, respectively). The best performance of the MDRD Study equation is confirmed both in the subgroups of patients with mGFR G60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and between 60 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. For mGFR 990 mL/min/1.73 m2, there were no significant differences between the two equations in terms of performance. Conclusions. The CKD-EPI creatinine equation does not offer a better GFR prediction in renal transplant patients compared with the MDRD Study equation, even in the earlier CKD stages. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCreatinine - or cystatin C - based equations to estimate glomerular filtration in the general population: impact on the epidemiology of chronic kidney disease
DELANAYE, Pierre ULg; CAVALIER, Etienne ULg; Moranne, Olivier et al

in BMC Nephrology (2013), 14

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major issue in public health. Its prevalence has been calculated using estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the creatinine-based equations developed in the ... [more ▼]

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major issue in public health. Its prevalence has been calculated using estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the creatinine-based equations developed in the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) study. Recently, new equations based either on cystatin C (CKD-EPI Cys) or both cystatin and creatinine (CKD-EPI mix) have been proposed by the CKD-EPI consortium. The aim of this study was to measure the difference in the prevalence of stage 3 CKD, defined as an estimated GFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, in a population using these four equations. METHODS: CKD screening was performed in the Province of Liege, Belgium. On a voluntary basis, people aged over 50 years have been screened. GFR was estimated by the four equations. Stage 3 CKD was defined as a GFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS: The population screened consisted of 4189 people (47% were men, mean age 63 +/- 7y). Their mean serum creatinine and plasma cystatin C levels were 0.88 +/- 0.21 mg/dL and 0.85 +/- 0.17 mg/L, respectively. The prevalence of CKD in this population using the MDRD, the CKD-EPI, the CKD-EPI Cys and the CKD-EPI mix equations was 13%, 9.8%, 4.7% and 5%, respectively. The prevalence of CKD was significantly higher with the creatinine-based (MDRD and the CKD-EPI) equations compared to the new cystatin C-based equations. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of CKD varies strongly depending on the method used to estimate GFR. Such discrepancies are of importance and must be confirmed and explained by additional studies, notably by studies using GFR measured with a reference method [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 50 (19 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailParathormone and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase for the follow-up of bone turnover in hemodialysis patients : Is it so simple?
DELANAYE, Pierre ULg; DUBOIS, Bernard ULg; JOURET, François ULg et al

in Clinica Chimica Acta (2013), 417

Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is associated with mineral and bone disorders (MBD). International guidelines suggest that levels of serum parathormone (PTH) or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase ... [more ▼]

Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is associated with mineral and bone disorders (MBD). International guidelines suggest that levels of serum parathormone (PTH) or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (b-ALP) can be used to evaluate MBD in dialysis patients. The evidence remains moderate and based on transversal studies. <br />Methods: We retrospectively investigated the variations of PTH (ΔPTH) and b-ALP (Δb-ALP) serum concentrations over a short (6-weeks) and a long (one-year) period in a monocentric hemodialysis population. The proportion of patients reaching the critical difference (CD) (50% for PTH and 25% for b-ALP) was calculated. <br />Results: Seventy-seven patientswere included. A significant correlation between PTHand b-ALP levelswas found at baseline (r=0.51). By contrast, no correlation was observed between ΔPTH and Δb-ALP over a 6-week interval (r=0.07). The CD for PTH and b-ALP was reached by 19 and 11 patients, respectively, with 2 patients showing consistent variations of both biomarkers. One year later, measurements were repeated in 48 survivors. <br />No correlation was found between ΔPTH and Δb-ALP (r=0.27). The CD for PTH or b-ALP was reached by 24 patients and 28 patients, respectively, with 6 patients (12.5%) showing opposite results for both biomarkers. <br />Conclusion: This study shows the lack of correlation between ΔPTH and Δb-ALP over time in patients under chronic hemodialysis. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 43 (17 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailGFR Estimation Using Standardized Cystatin C in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Masson, Ingrid; Maillard, Nicolas; Tack, Ivan et al

in American Journal of Kidney Diseases (2013), 61(2), 279-284

Background: The utility of serum cystatin C (SCysC) as a filtration marker in kidney transplantation is uncertain. We took advantage of the recent validation of a reference calibrator for SCysC and of ... [more ▼]

Background: The utility of serum cystatin C (SCysC) as a filtration marker in kidney transplantation is uncertain. We took advantage of the recent validation of a reference calibrator for SCysC and of newly developed CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equations (2012) expressed for use with standardized SCysC level to reassess the performance of SCysC as a filtration marker in kidney transplant recipients. Study Design: Study of diagnostic test accuracy. Setting & Participants: 670 kidney transplant recipients from 3 centers undergoing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements from December 2006 to November 2012. Index Test: Estimated GFR (eGFR) using the 2012 SCysC-based and serum creatinine (SCr)/SCysCbased CKD-EPI equations (eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys, respectively) and the 2009 SCr-based CKD-EPI equation (eGFRcr), with SCysC and SCr measured at a single laboratory between April 2011 and June 2011. Reference Test: Measured GFR (mGFR) using urinary clearance of inulin. Results: Bias (the difference between mGFR and eGFR) was significantly smaller for eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys versus eGFRcr ( 2.82 and 0.54 vs 4.4 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively; P 0.001). Precision (standard deviation of the mean bias) also was better for eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys versus eGFRcr (12 and 11 vs 13 mL/min/1.73 m2 [P 0.001 for both comparisons]). Accuracy (percentage of GFR estimates within 30% of mGFR) was greater for eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys versus eGFRcr (81% and 86% vs 75%, respectively [P 0.004 and P 0.001]). Net reclassification index with respect to mGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 for eGFRcr-cys and eGFRcys versus eGFRcr was 18.8% [95% CI, 8.6%-28.9%] and 22.5% [95% CI, 10.2%-34.9%]. Limitations: Patients were exclusively of European descent; association with transplant outcome was not evaluated. Conclusions: Our data validate the use of both the newly developed SCysC-based and SCr/SCysC-based CKD-EPI equations (2012) in kidney transplant recipients. Both equations perform better than the SCr-based CKD-EPI equation (2009). [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (8 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailL'estimation du débit de filtration glomérulaire en 2012: quelle valeur ajoutée pour la nouvelle équation CKD-EPI
DELANAYE, Pierre ULg; Mariat, Christophe; Moranne, Olivier et al

in Néphrologie & Thérapeutique (2012), 8

Mesurer ou estimer le debit de filtration glomerulaire (DFG) reste l’un des meilleurs moyens d’apprehender la fonction glomerulaire du rein. En 2009, l’equation Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD ... [more ▼]

Mesurer ou estimer le debit de filtration glomerulaire (DFG) reste l’un des meilleurs moyens d’apprehender la fonction glomerulaire du rein. En 2009, l’equation Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) a ete proposee en lieu et place de l’equation Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) pour estimer le DFG. Cette nouvelle equation fait partie desormais des toutes dernieres recommandations de la Haute Autorite de sante (HAS). Par rapport a MDRD, la formule CKD-EPI est sensee moins sous-estimer le DFG mesure, principalement dans les valeurs les plus hautes de DFG. Dans cette revue critique de la litterature, nous presenterons et discuterons les performances de cette nouvelle equation. Sur base des articles publies entre 2009 et 2012, nous en soulignerons les avantages, notamment en terme d’estimation de la prevalence de la maladie renale chronique (MRC), mais aussi les faiblesses, principalement dans certaines populations specifiques. En effet, toutes ces equations reposant sur la mesure de la creatinine serique restent des estimations et le nephrologue doit donc garder son sens critique dans l’interpretation de ces resultats. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 35 (1 ULg)