References of "Mairiaux, Philippe"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailOccupational stress among textile workers in the Democratic Republic of Congo
Panda Lukongo, Kitronza ULg; Mairiaux, Philippe ULg

in tropical medicine and health (2015), In Press(In Press),

Abstract. Context: In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), scientific studies on occupational health are scarce. The present study aims at estimating the level of occupational stress, as well as ... [more ▼]

Abstract. Context: In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), scientific studies on occupational health are scarce. The present study aims at estimating the level of occupational stress, as well as associated factors, in a textile company. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional survey among textile workers in DRC. Data (N= 192 subjects) were collected through a self-questionnaire validated for the assessment of stress (Karasek and Siegrist’s scale); supplemented by a medical examination. Frequencies and odds ratios (ORs) were estimated for descriptive analyses. Adjusted ORs were calculated through a logistic regression model to investigate associations between socio-demographic and organisational variable and stress. Results: Our study highlighted a high level of stress among individuals: 28% of them were suffering from stress, according to Karasek, and 22%, when applying Siegrist’s model. A 14%-isostrain was calculated when considering all workers. A statistically significant association was observed between stress and age, seniority and perceived no-adaptation to work, considering both approaches. Furthermore, when job strain was determined according to Karasek, it was related to the status of worker, the poor perception of organisation and alcohol consumption, while stress estimated by applying Siegrist’s model showed an association with education level and the occurrence of cardiac symptoms. Conclusion: The present study gives evidence of stress among individuals through both models. Several socio-professional factors are associated with stress, which determines populations at risk. The study revealed that both stress models offer complementary information, thus increasing the probability to model workers’ health more exactly and to make recommendations on prevention and management. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (6 ULg)
Peer Reviewed
See detailOccupational physicians managing workers long-term sickness absence : are they willing to cooperate with family and social insurance physicians ?
Mairiaux, Philippe ULg; Vanmeerbeek, Marc ULg; Schippers, Nathalie ULg et al

Conference (2015, June)

Introduction In Belgium, sickness absence (SA) management implies complementary roles for family (FPs), social insurance (SIPs) and occupational physicians (OPs): FPs deliver sick notes, SIPs control SA ... [more ▼]

Introduction In Belgium, sickness absence (SA) management implies complementary roles for family (FPs), social insurance (SIPs) and occupational physicians (OPs): FPs deliver sick notes, SIPs control SA benefits and OPs strive to adapt work environments to workers’ capacities. In practice however, there is little cooperation between the three physicians. This study aimed at identifying FP-OP-SIP cooperation channels in order to prevent long-term work disability. Methods The study involved two phases. (1) Using the nominal group technique, researchers from the three physician groups reached a consensus on 15 proposals to enhance inter-professional cooperation. (2) A Delphi study was conducted to validate these proposals: 61 experts representing professional groups of physicians (FP, SIP, OP), patients, government, employers and labor unions were asked to participate. A 18-items questionnaire (the 15 proposals + 3 open questions) was used in a 2-round Delphi study. Proposals were accepted if 80% of experts agreed. Results Participation rate was 77% in round 1 and 7 out of the 15 proposals were accepted. During round 2, participation rate was 94%; 2 of the remaining proposals reached agreement level. Public authorities were thus advised to invest in a) promotion of pre-return to work visit with the OP for sick-listed patients; b) a website with OPs contact data; c) joint guidelines for return to work guidance; d) joint training of the 3 physician groups; 5) safe electronic information exchange. Several proposals aiming at giving work-related information to FPs and SIPs did not reach agreement within the OPs expert group. OPs expressed concerns about their own workload and FPs or SIPs ability to understand and use those information. Discussion The need for inter-physician cooperation in disability management may exceed individual goodwill and should best be organised by public authorities. This study may be a first step in this process. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 36 (10 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailRetour au travail après un cancer du sein
Mairiaux, Philippe ULg; Schippers, Nathalie ULg; DESREUX, Joëlle ULg et al

Conference (2015, April 23)

Detailed reference viewed: 27 (2 ULg)
See detailL'avenir de la médecine du travail
Mairiaux, Philippe ULg

Conference given outside the academic context (2015)

Detailed reference viewed: 16 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailLa collaboration entre différentes disciplines médicales : ou est le problème ? Etude Partnership in Medicine
Vanmeerbeek, Marc ULg; Govers, Patrick ULg; Schippers, Nathalie ULg et al

Conference (2015, March 27)

Objectifs Les maladies ou problèmes médicaux d’origine professionnelle, ou en lien avec le travail, impliquent à des degrés divers les médecins généralistes (MG), les médecins du travail (MT) et les ... [more ▼]

Objectifs Les maladies ou problèmes médicaux d’origine professionnelle, ou en lien avec le travail, impliquent à des degrés divers les médecins généralistes (MG), les médecins du travail (MT) et les médecins-conseils des mutuelles (MC). Le manque de relation fonctionnelle entre eux peut compliquer ou retarder le retour au travail du patient. L’étude cherchait des pistes d’amélioration de la collaboration. Méthode Deux méthodes de consensus ont été successivement utilisées parmi les trois professions : huit groupes nominaux (GN) ont réunis 74 médecins de terrain; deux rondes Delphi ont concerné 28 décideurs. Résultats Un seul médecin a été perdu de vue entre les 2 tours du Delphi. Les propositions issues des GN concernaient le transfert d’informations (surtout les MT et les MC), la collaboration (surtout les MG et les MT), les connaissances, et le cadre légal et réglementaire (surtout les MC). Cinq questions sur 14 n’ont pas fait consensus (≥75%) au 1er tour du Delphi, et 10 propositions sur 13 ont été rejetées au 2e tour. Les désaccords portaient sur la nature des données à transférer, les modalités de transfert d’information, la disponibilité des données de contact des médecins. Un processus d’évitement spécifique a été mis en évidence. Certains commentaires montraient un déni de la capacité des autres à comprendre son champ professionnel, et une difficulté à considérer leur spécificité propre. Conclusions L’étude montre que le patient n’est pas un objet partagé de la relation. Le modèle Resource Dependence Institutional Cooperation (De Rijk) permet de distinguer les entraves à la volonté de coopérer (dépendance perçue) des limitations dans la capacité à le faire (manque de ressources). Le modèle quadridimensionnel de la collaboration (D’Amour) identifie un déficit d’internalisation du côté relationnel (reconnaissance des autres), et un déficit de gouvernance et de formalisation du côté organisationnel, où des initiatives volontaristes des autorités seraient bienvenues. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 37 (9 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPre-employement examination for low back risk in workers exposesd to manual handling of loads : French guidelines
PETIT, Audrey; ROUSSEAU, Sandrine; HUEZ, Jean-François et al

in International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health (2015)

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailFrench good practice guidelines for medical and occupational surveillance of the low back pain risk among workers exposed to manual handling of loads
PETIT, Audrey; FASSIER, Jean-Baptiste; ROUSSEAU, Sandrine et al

in Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (2015)

Several clinical practice guidelines related to the assessment and management of low back pain (LBP) have been published with varied scopes and methods. This paper summarises the first French occupational ... [more ▼]

Several clinical practice guidelines related to the assessment and management of low back pain (LBP) have been published with varied scopes and methods. This paper summarises the first French occupational guidelines for management of work-related LBP (October 2013). There main originality is to treat all the three stages of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of work-related LBP. The guidelines were written by a multidisciplinary working group of 24 experts, according to the Clinical Practice Guidelines method proposed by French National Health Authority, and reviewed by a multidisciplinary peer review committee of 50 experts. Recommendations were based on a large systematic review of the literature carried out from 1990 to 2012 and rated as strong (Level A), moderate (B), limited (C) or based on expert consensus (D) according to their level of evidence. It is recommended to deliver reassuring and consistent information concerning LBP prognosis (Level B); to perform a clinical examination looking for medical signs of severity related to LBP (Level A), encourage continuation or resumption of physical activity (Level A), identify any changes in working conditions and evaluate the occupational impact of LBP (Level D). In case of persistent/recurrent LBP, assess prognostic factors likely to influence progression to chronic LBP, prolonged disability and delayed return to work (Level A). In case of prolonged/repeated sick leave, evaluate the pain, functional disability and their impact and main risk factors for prolonged work disability (Level A), promote return to work measures and inter professional coordination (Level D). These good practice guidelines are primarily intended for professionals of occupational health but also for treating physicians and paramedical personnel participating in the management of LBP, workers and employers. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 17 (0 ULg)
Peer Reviewed
See detailCancer du sein et retour au travail
Schippers, Nathalie ULg; Van Hoof, Elke; Mairiaux, Philippe ULg

Poster (2014, December 17)

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (7 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailL'implication des médecins généralistes dans la gestion des abus de substances
Ketterer, Frédéric ULg; Symons, Linda; Lambrechts, Marie-Claire et al

Conference (2014, November 28)

Introduction : Les médecins généralistes jouent un rôle majeur dans la détection et la gestion des abus de substances. L'étude présentée ici investiguait les facteurs qui influencent leur implication ... [more ▼]

Introduction : Les médecins généralistes jouent un rôle majeur dans la détection et la gestion des abus de substances. L'étude présentée ici investiguait les facteurs qui influencent leur implication concernant la gestion des abus d'alcool, des drogues illégales, des hypnotiques et des anxiolytiques dans la population belge des 18-65 ans. Méthode : 20 MG ont été interrogés par entretiens semi-directifs. Le I-Change Model de de Vries a été utilisé pour construire le guide d'entretien et analyser les données récoltées. Il s'agit d'un modèle de prédiction du comportement. Résultats : Parmi les principaux résultats de l'étude, il ressortait que les MG étaient fortement influencés dans leur approche par leurs propres représentations de l'abus, qui oscillait leurs responsabilités professionnelles envers ces patients et la responsabilité de ces derniers quant à la gestion de leur santé, avec l'idée de faute morale en substrat. En ce sens, l'abus de substance était perçu sur un continuum entre l'abus comme forme de maladie chronique d'une part, et la faute morale d'autre part. L'alcool et le cannabis étaient néanmoins mieux acceptés socialement que les autres substances. Les propres expériences personnelles des généralistes concernant les abus avaient aussi une incidence sur leur volonté de s'investir avec ces patients. Pour autant, les pratiques multidisciplinaires (notamment au forfait) et l'expérience étaient évoquées comme des facteurs importants quant à l'engagement dans la gestion. Les contraintes temporelles et l'investissement demandé étaient, en revanche, considérés comme des barrières. Discussion : Les facteurs motivationnels apparaissaient centraux dans la décision de s'investir dans la gestion des abus de substances, bien davantage que les connaissances théoriques et les formations qui semblaient plus secondaires. La peur du burnout s'exprimait donc en substrat. La formation des MG devrait tenir compte de ce souhait de se protéger, afin de favoriser simultanément une approche centrée sur le patient. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 15 (0 ULg)
Full Text
See detailLes changements sociétaux sont-ils promoteurs de bien-être au travail ?
Mairiaux, Philippe ULg

Conference (2014, November 17)

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (4 ULg)
Full Text
See detailSanté mentale et travail - les enjeux sociétaux
Mairiaux, Philippe ULg

Conference (2014, November 13)

Detailed reference viewed: 32 (4 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKnowledge transfer from Belgian government to medical doctors
MORTELMANS, Katrien; REMMEN, Roy; BERKEIN, Philip et al

Conference (2014, October 02)

Detailed reference viewed: 17 (2 ULg)
Full Text
See detailDimensions psychosociales de la santé
Mairiaux, Philippe ULg; Absil, Gaëtan ULg; Govers, Patrick ULg

Learning material (2014)

Detailed reference viewed: 125 (9 ULg)
Peer Reviewed
See detailInter-professional cooperation between family, occupational and social insurance physicians in managing long-term sickness absence
Mairiaux, Philippe ULg; Vanmeerbeek, Marc ULg; Schippers, Nathalie ULg et al

Conference (2014, September 30)

Background In the Belgian health system, sickness absence (SA) management implies complementary roles for general practitioners (GPs), social insurance physicians (SIPs) and occupational physicians (OPs ... [more ▼]

Background In the Belgian health system, sickness absence (SA) management implies complementary roles for general practitioners (GPs), social insurance physicians (SIPs) and occupational physicians (OPs): GPs deliver sick notes and treatment, SIPs control SA benefits and OPs strive to adapt work environments to workers’ remaining capacities. In practice however, there is little cooperation between the three physicians. In 2009, the Ministry of Employment commissioned a study to identify GP-OP-SIP cooperation channels in order to prevent long-term work disability. Methods The study involved two phases. 1) Researchers from the three groups agreed on 15 proposals to enhance cooperation: to establish a formal contact between GP, SIP and OP for patients with > 3 months SA (n=3) ; SIP decision to end SA benefit to be forwarded to the GP (n=2) ; work-related information to be provided by the OP to GP and/or SIP (n=4); website giving contact data of GPs, SIPs, and OPs (n=2) ; initial and continuous education focusing on inter-physician cooperation (n=3); electronic data exchange when dealing with long-term SA (n=1). 2) A Delphi study was conducted in 2012 to validate these proposals: 61 experts representing professional groups of physicians (GP, SIP, OP), patients, government, employers and labor unions were asked to participate. A 18-items questionnaire (the 15 proposals and 3 open questions) was used in a 2-round Delphi study. Proposals were accepted if 80% of experts agreed. For drafting the final proposals, the research team relied on a multidisciplinary expert group. Results Participation rate was 77% (47/61 experts) in round 1 and 7 out of the 15 proposals were accepted. During round 2, participation rate was 94% (44/47); 2 of the remaining proposals reached agreement level. Public authorities were thus advised to invest in a) promotion of pre-return to work visit with the OP for sick-listed patients; b) a website with OPs contact data; c) joint guidelines for return to work guidance; d) joint training of the 3 physician groups; 5) methods ensuring safe electronic information exchange. Conclusions The need for inter-physician cooperation in disability management may exceed individual goodwill and should best be organised by public authorities. The current study may be a first step in this process. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 42 (11 ULg)
Peer Reviewed
See detailFrench good practice guidelines for the management of the low back pain risk among workers exposed to manual handling
Petit, Audrey; Mairiaux, Philippe ULg; FASSIER, Jean-Baptiste et al

Poster (2014, September 29)

Background Manual handling of loads (MHL) is a widespread practice in the workplace and is the leading cause of work accidents. In particular, MHL is associated with a risk of low back injuries which can ... [more ▼]

Background Manual handling of loads (MHL) is a widespread practice in the workplace and is the leading cause of work accidents. In particular, MHL is associated with a risk of low back injuries which can compromise staying at work and worker's career in the case of recurrence or chronicity. This communication aims to set forth the French occupational Guidelines for the management of the low back pain (LBP) risk among workers exposed to MHL, published in October 2013. Methods These Good Practice Guidelines were written according to the Clinical Practice Guidelines method proposed by the French National Authority for Health. They emanated from a synthesis of the literature by a multidisciplinary working party of 24 experts and were peer reviewed by a committee of 50 experts. These Guidelines are designed to define the components of an appropriate surveillance program for all workers exposed to MHL activities at the workplace and especially suffering from LBP and still at work, or suffering LBP and on sick leave. Results Because of the potential impact on workers’ fears and beliefs, the information provided by the various actors must be consistent, or even reassuring in relation to the prognosis of LBP. Among LBP workers, it is recommended to look for signs of severity or an underlying disease at the acute, subacute and chronic stages of LBP; to encourage continuation or resumption of physical activity; situate the current episode of LBP in the worker’s work history (recent changes of working conditions) and evaluate the impact of LBP on the worker’s job. In the case of persistent or recurrent LBP, it is recommended to evaluate biopsychosocial and socioeconomic risk factors likely to influence chronicity, prolonged incapacity and delay return to work. If workers are on prolonged and/or repeated sick leave for LBP, a pre-return-to-work visit is recommended to evaluate the pain and functional disability and their repercussions, as well as the main factors of prolonged work incapacity; encourage and help the worker to develop a return to work dynamic; identify the main difficulties related to work and possible job adjustments and evaluate the need to initiate a job staying at work approach. Conclusions Primary, secondary and tertiary prevention are necessary for the management of low back pain at work. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 34 (0 ULg)
Full Text
See detailLes déterminants de la désinsertion professionnelle
Mairiaux, Philippe ULg

Conference (2014, June 02)

Detailed reference viewed: 38 (5 ULg)