References of "Kahan, A"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailSTOPP (STudy on Osteoarthritis Progression Prevention): chondroitin sulfate reduces the progression of joint space narrowing in knee OA
Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg; Vignon, E.; Uebelhart, D. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2007, March), 18(Suppl.1), 187-188

Detailed reference viewed: 107 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailA randomized controlled trial with chondroitin sulfate involving over 600 patients: STOPP (STudy on Osteoarthritis Progression Prevention)
Kahan, A.; Vignon, E.; Uebelhart, D. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2007, March), 18(Suppl.1), 14-15

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCorrélation entre l'augmentation de la densité minérale osseuse et la réduction du risque fracturaire lors d'un traitement par ranélate de strontium
Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Cormier, C.; Fardellone, Patrice et al

in Revue du Rhumatisme (2006, December), 73

Detailed reference viewed: 7 (4 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailTotal joint replacement of hip or knee as an outcome measure for structure modifying trials in osteoarthritis
Altman, R. D.; Abadie, Eric ULg; Avouac, B. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2005, March), 16(Suppl.3), 10

Detailed reference viewed: 32 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailTotal joint replacement of hip or knee as an outcome measure for structure modifying trials in osteoarthritis
Altman, R. D.; Abadie, Eric ULg; Avouac, B. et al

in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (2005), 13(1), 13-19

Objective: The Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES) organized a working group to assess the value of time to joint surgery as a potential therapeutic failure outcome criterion ... [more ▼]

Objective: The Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES) organized a working group to assess the value of time to joint surgery as a potential therapeutic failure outcome criterion for osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee in the assessment of potential structure modifying agents. Methods: PubMed was searched for manuscripts from 1976 to 2004. Relevant studies were discussed at a 1-day meeting. Results: There are no accepted guidelines for 'time to' and 'indications for' joint replacement surgery. A limited number of trials have examined joint replacement surgery within the study population. Several parameters, particularly joint space narrowing (interbone distance), correlate with surgical intervention. However, at the level of the knee, none of the parameters have positive predictive value for joint replacement surgery better than 30%. In contrast, lack of significant joint space narrowing has a strong negative predictive value for joint replacement surgery (> 90%), that remains after controlling for OA pain severity. Conclusion: At this time, GREES cannot recommend time to joint surgery as a primary endpoint of failure for structure modifying trials of hip or knee OA-as the parameter has sensitivity but lacks specificity. In contrast, in existing trials, a lack of progression of joint space narrowing has predictive value of > 90% for not having surgery. GREES suggests utilizing joint space narrowing (e.g., > 0.3-0.7 mm) combined with a lack of clinically relevant improvement in symptoms (e.g., greater than or equal to 20-25%) for 'failure' of a secondary outcome in structure modifying trials of the hip and knee. (C) 2004 OsteoArthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 68 (10 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe use of placebo-controlled and non-inferiority trials for the evaluation of new drugs in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis
Delmas, P. D.; Calvo, Gisèle ULg; Boers, M. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2002), 13(1), 1-5

Registration of new agents for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis has been based over the past few years on placebo-controlled phase III trials with the incidence of patients with new vertebral ... [more ▼]

Registration of new agents for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis has been based over the past few years on placebo-controlled phase III trials with the incidence of patients with new vertebral/nonvertebral fractures as the most usual primary endpoint. The use of a placebo in diseases where an active treatment is available has been a matter of debate following the update of the Declaration of Helsinki by the World Medical Association which questioned this trial design. Current regulatory recommendations within the European Union suggest that placebo-controlled trials are still the best option when assessing the efficacy and safety of new drugs intended for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This suggestion seems to be in apparent contradiction with the current content of the Declaration of Helsinki. This paper addresses the ethics and feasibility of placebo-controlled trials in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, in the light of available therapeutic options, and discusses possible alternative approaches in those patients where placebo treatment could be deemed to be unethical. It is concluded that placebo-controlled trials remain the most efficient design to establish the efficacy and safety of a new agent for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Such trials are feasible and ethically acceptable in patients with osteoporosis but without prevalent vertebral fractures. Conversely, in patients with prevalent vertebral fractures, placebo-controlled trials are ethically questionable and non-inferiority trials are more appropriate. A relative margin of non inferiority of 20-30% is suggested, to be discussed on a case by case basis. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 40 (3 ULg)