References of "Jia, X"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailComparative magnetotail flapping: An overview of selectec events ad Earth, Jupiter and Saturn
Volwerk, M.; Andre, N.; Arridge, C. et al

in Annales Geophysicae [= ANGEO] (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 20 (5 ULg)
See detailComparative magnetotail flapping: Overview of observations at Earth, Jupiter and Saturn
Volwerk, M.; Andre, N.; Arridge, C. et al

Conference (2011)

Detailed reference viewed: 6 (0 ULg)
See detailAn overview of the aims and plans of an ISSI Team: Investigating the Dynamics of Planetary Magnetotails
Jackman, C.; Andre, N.; Arridge, C. et al

Poster (2011)

Detailed reference viewed: 8 (0 ULg)
See detailComparative Planetary Magnetotails
Bagenal, F.; Jackman, C.; Slavin, J. et al

Poster (2011)

Detailed reference viewed: 7 (0 ULg)
See detailThe very busy auroral footprint of Ganymede
Grodent, Denis ULg; Bonfond, Bertrand ULg; Radioti, Aikaterini ULg et al

Conference (2009, September 13)

Detailed reference viewed: 1 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailSimulations of Structures in Packed Columns and Validation by X-ray Tomography
Caulkin, R.; Jia, X.; Xu, C. et al

in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (2009), 48(1), 202-213

Packing simulations of generic, nonspherical pellets were performed and compared with experimental data sets obtained using X-ray Computerized tomography (CT). Two modified versions of what was previously ... [more ▼]

Packing simulations of generic, nonspherical pellets were performed and compared with experimental data sets obtained using X-ray Computerized tomography (CT). Two modified versions of what was previously a purely geometrical, digitally based packing algorithm were implemented. Both are aimed at incorporating the effects of particle interaction forces, one utilizing the distinct element method (DigiDEM) and the other an intermediate solution (collision-guided packing or DigiCGP). This article summarizes the models and the simulations performed using these two modified versions of DigiPac and, for model validation purposes, compares the predicted results with the corresponding X-ray tomographic scans of packed columns, in terms of bulk density, local packing density profiles, and pellet orientation distributions. For packed beds of relatively large and identical pellets, the simulation results indicate that particle-particle and particle-wall interactions cannot be ignored if realistic packing structures are to be obtained by simulation and even a simplistic treatment of these interactions can produce significantly more realistic packing structure than none at all. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 79 (10 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailValidation of DigiPac Simulations of packed columns using x-ray microtomography
Jia, X.; Xu, C.; Caulkin, R. et al

in Mc Cann, H.; Johansen, G. A. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Bergen, Norway, September 6-9, 2007 (2007, September)

Detailed reference viewed: 38 (7 ULg)