References of "Delacollette, Nathalie"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailStéréotypes prescriptifs et avantages des groupes dominants
Delacollette, Nathalie ULg; Dardenne, Benoît ULg; Dumont, Muriel ULg

in Année Psychologique (L') (2010), 110

The prescriptive component of stereotypes is defined as a set of beliefs about the characteristics group members should possess. It has mainly been studied regarding gender stereotypes. We believe that ... [more ▼]

The prescriptive component of stereotypes is defined as a set of beliefs about the characteristics group members should possess. It has mainly been studied regarding gender stereotypes. We believe that the main function of this prescriptive component is to allow dominant group members to maintain subordinate group members in an advantageous position for themselves. To illustrate our proposal, we present several theoretical and empirical papers, showing that the relative status of social groups is a determinant of which characteristics are prescribed to the members of these groups; that subordinates who fail to conform to the prescription are sanctioned; and that dominants prescribe to subordinates characteristics they see as beneficial to their own group. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 81 (11 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailLatent structure of the French Validation of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Echelle de Sexisme Ambivalent
Dardenne, Benoît ULg; Delacollette, Nathalie ULg; Grégoire, Christine et al

in Année Psychologique (L') (2006), 106(2), 235-263

Glick and Fiske's (1996) Ambivalent Sexism Inventory is a measure of hostile sexism (sexist antipathy) and benevolent sexism (a subjectively positive attitude toward women). This paper proposes a French ... [more ▼]

Glick and Fiske's (1996) Ambivalent Sexism Inventory is a measure of hostile sexism (sexist antipathy) and benevolent sexism (a subjectively positive attitude toward women). This paper proposes a French version of this scale, the Echelle de Sexisme Ambivalent (ESA). Three studies on more than 1000 participants established the validity of this new scale. The first one is the application of Rasch's extended model that confirmed the psychometrical qualities of the ESA, for both male and female participants. The second study established the structural and predictive validity in a covariance analysis. This study again showed that both male and female participants displayed the same structural pattern. Next, both discriminant and convergent validity were assessed, by comparison to the Neosexism Scale (Tougas, Brown, Beaton and Joly, 1995) and the Social Dominance Scale (Sidanius and Pratto, 1999). Finally, practical and theoretical implications are discussed. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 103 (10 ULg)