Strontium ranelate improves osteoarthritis symptoms compared to placebo in patients with knee OA: The SEKOIA studyBruyère, Olivier ; ; et alin Osteoporosis International (2013, April), 24(Suppl.1), 49-51 Detailed reference viewed: 10 (3 ULg) Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: results of a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.Reginster, Jean-Yves ; ; et alin Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2013), 72(2), 179-86 BACKGROUND: Strontium ranelate is currently used for osteoporosis. The international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled Strontium ranelate Efficacy in Knee OsteoarthrItis triAl evaluated its ... [more ▼] BACKGROUND: Strontium ranelate is currently used for osteoporosis. The international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled Strontium ranelate Efficacy in Knee OsteoarthrItis triAl evaluated its effect on radiological progression of knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Patients with knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or 3, and joint space width (JSW) 2.5-5 mm) were randomly allocated to strontium ranelate 1 g/day (n=558), 2 g/day (n=566) or placebo (n=559). The primary endpoint was radiographical change in JSW (medial tibiofemoral compartment) over 3 years versus placebo. Secondary endpoints included radiological progression, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and knee pain. The trial is registered (ISRCTN41323372). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population included 1371 patients. Treatment with strontium ranelate was associated with smaller degradations in JSW than placebo (1 g/day: -0.23 (SD 0.56) mm; 2 g/day: -0.27 (SD 0.63) mm; placebo: -0.37 (SD 0.59) mm); treatment-placebo differences were 0.14 (SE 0.04), 95% CI 0.05 to 0.23, p<0.001 for 1 g/day and 0.10 (SE 0.04), 95% CI 0.02 to 0.19, p=0.018 for 2 g/day. Fewer radiological progressors were observed with strontium ranelate (p<0.001 and p=0.012 for 1 and 2 g/day). There were greater reductions in total WOMAC score (p=0.045), pain subscore (p=0.028), physical function subscore (p=0.099) and knee pain (p=0.065) with strontium ranelate 2 g/day. Strontium ranelate was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with strontium ranelate 1 and 2 g/day is associated with a significant effect on structure in patients with knee osteoarthritis, and a beneficial effect on symptoms for strontium ranelate 2 g/day. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 1 (1 ULg) Structure modifying effects of strontium ranelate in knee osteoarthritisReginster, Jean-Yves ; ; et alin Osteoporosis International (2012, March), 23(S2), 58-59 Detailed reference viewed: 110 (5 ULg) Strontium ranelate reduces the number of radiological or radioclinical progressors in patients with primary knee osteoarthritisReginster, Jean-Yves ; ; et alin Osteoporosis International (2012, March), 23(S2), 366-367 Detailed reference viewed: 41 (2 ULg) Strontium ranelate in knee osteoarthritis trial (SEKOIA) : a structural and symptomatic efficacyReginster, Jean-Yves ; ; et alin Arthritis and Rheumatism (2012), 64(S10), 681 Detailed reference viewed: 35 (1 ULg) Clinically meaningful effect of strontium ranelate on knee osteoarthritis symptomsBruyère, Olivier ; ; et alin Arthritis and Rheumatism (2012), 64(S10), 110 Detailed reference viewed: 11 (1 ULg) Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis : a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled international trial; ; et al in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2012), 71(3), 693 Detailed reference viewed: 19 (1 ULg) Early decrease of serum biomarkers of type II collagen degradation (Coll2-1) and joint inflammation (Coll2-1NO2) by hyaluronic acid intra-articular injections in patients with knee osteoarthritisHenrotin, Yves ; ; et alin Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2011), 70(Suppl 3), 214 Detailed reference viewed: 9 (0 ULg) Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee ostoarthritis : a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled international trialReginster, Jean-Yves ; ; et alin Osteoporosis International (2011), 22(S5), 742-743 Detailed reference viewed: 41 (1 ULg) Early effect of hyaluronic acid intra-articular injections on serum and urine biomarkers in patients with knee osteoarthritis: An open-label observational prospective study.; ; et al in Journal of Orthopaedic Research (2011) The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of hyaluronic acid (HA) intra articular injections (IA) on osteoarthritis (OA) biomarkers in patients with knee OA. Prospective open label study. Fifty ... [more ▼] The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of hyaluronic acid (HA) intra articular injections (IA) on osteoarthritis (OA) biomarkers in patients with knee OA. Prospective open label study. Fifty-one patients with unilateral symptomatic K-OA received IA injections of 2mL of HA on days (D) 1, 7, 14 and were followed 3 months. At D-15 patients were examined and X-rays performed, to exclude patients with bilateral K-OA, or those with more than three symptomatic OA joints. From 15 days (D-15) before the first injection to D90 concomitant therapies were unchanged. Walking pain (WP) on VAS was obtained at each visit. Urine (U) and serum (S) samples were obtained at D-15, D1, D30, and D90. S-C2C, S-Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, S-HA, S-CS 846 epitope, S-type II collagen propeptide, and U-type II collagen C telopeptide (U-CTX II/creatinin) were assayed. Predictive factors of response were analyzed using logistic regression. Correlations between variables were obtained using Spearman test. Forty-five patients were analyzed. Between D-15 and D1 there was no difference for any biomarkers At D1, WP (SD) was correlated with U-CTX II/creat (p = 0.006). Between D1 and D90: U-CTX II/creat decreased significantly. After adjustment for confounding variables there was a significant correlation between clinical response and U-CTX II/creat variation. U-CTX II and S-HA at baseline were independently predictive of clinical response. This study showed that 90 days after HA IA injections, U-CTX II levels significantly decrease compared to baseline, suggesting a slowdown of type II collagen degradation. (c) 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 6 (1 ULg) Recommandations sur la prise en charge de l'arthrose de la hanche et du genou. Pour qui ? Pourquoi ? Pour quoi faire ?Henrotin, Yves ; in Presse Médicale (Paris, France : 1983) (2010) This paper summarizes the guidelines published by the Osteoarthritis research society International(OARSI) and compares these guidelines with others. The OARSI guidelines are based on a systematic review ... [more ▼] This paper summarizes the guidelines published by the Osteoarthritis research society International(OARSI) and compares these guidelines with others. The OARSI guidelines are based on a systematic review of the literature, a meta-analysis and an expert consensus. The OARSI has developed 25 guidelines including 8 for pharmacology modalities, 12 for non-pharmacology modalities and 5 for surgery modalities. The usefulness of the guidelines in the daily practice is very low. The barriers for the guidelines implementation are the lack of interest of the practitioners, the lack of scientific advances in the OA diagnosis and treatments and the low applicability of these guidelines in the daily practice. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 133 (5 ULg) |
||