Milk production of Holsteins under Mediterranean conditions: case of the Tunisian population; ; Hammami, Hedi et alin Rekik, Boulbaba (Ed.) Milk Production (2012) Detailed reference viewed: 34 (1 ULg) Optimal age at first calving for improved milk yield and lengh of productive life in Tunisian Holstein cows; ; et al in American-Eurasian Journal of Agronomy (2009), 2(3), 162-167 The effects of age at first calving on milk production and true herd life were studied in Tunisian Holstein cows. There were 33,407 first lactation records of cows born between 1987 and 2001 from 166 ... [more ▼] The effects of age at first calving on milk production and true herd life were studied in Tunisian Holstein cows. There were 33,407 first lactation records of cows born between 1987 and 2001 from 166 herds. Firstly, age at first calving was analyzed using an animal model that included herd, calving year, herd-calving year interaction, calving month, and age of dam as fixed effects and the random additive genetic effect. Secondly, differences in first lactation and productive life milk yields and in true herd life were explained by age at first calving in addition to herd, year at first calving, herd-year at first calving interaction and month at first calving. A cow produced on the average 5669.8 kg milk (SD=1812 kg) during a 305-d first lactation period. The lifetime production of a cow was was 19,496.3 kg (SD=12,192 kg) during 3.3 lactations (SD=1.8 lactations). Coefficients of determination ranged from 14% for true herd life to 64% for first lactation milk yield. The mean of true herd life was 38.6 months (SD=24 months) and the mean age at first calving was 28.7 months (SD=3.4 months). Posterior mean of heritability of the age at first calving derived by a Markov Chain Monte Carlo Bayesien method via a Gibbs sampling algorithm was 0.08. The reduction of age at first calving to around 24 months may result in improved 305-d and lifetime yields and a longer herd life in Tunisian Holsteins. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 137 (2 ULg) Milk production of imported heifers and Tunisian-born Holstein cows; ; et al in American-Eurasian Journal of Agronomy (2009), 1(3), 36-42 Test day (TD) records of milk, fat and protein yields and somatic cell scores (SCS) were studied in Holstein cows in Tunisia. There were 43114, 32923 and 24633 lactation records collected on first, second ... [more ▼] Test day (TD) records of milk, fat and protein yields and somatic cell scores (SCS) were studied in Holstein cows in Tunisia. There were 43114, 32923 and 24633 lactation records collected on first, second and third parity cows between 1992 and 2004 in 182 herds. Records were of cows born in Tunisia (22000 cows) and those imported from Europe (10830 cows) and North America (850 cows). Variation of total days in milk (DIM) per lactation was studied in function of the herd, calving year x calving season interaction and the origin of the cow. Test-day records were analyzed using a linear model that included calving year x calving season and herd x test-day date interactions, calving season, calving year and origin of the cow. The effective length of lactation was affected by all factors included in the model (p< 0.0001) in all lactations. Test- day milk, protein and fat yields and TD SCS varied (p< 0.01) with management and climatic factors (calving year x calving season and herd x test-day date interactions and year and season of calving). A cow produced 18.8 kg, 0.61 kg and 0.58 kg of milk, fat and protein yields on a daily basis in all lactations, respectively. Average SCS was 2.8 in the three lactations. The origin of the cow was an important (p < 0.05) source of variation for DIM, yields and SCS in all lactations except for first lactation cell scores (p>0.05). Cows born in Tunisia seemed to perform better than imported cows in the first lactation while imported cows showed clearly better performances in later lactations. North American cows produced the highest yields and had the lowest SCS among all cows in the second and third lactations. Imported high producing cows seemed able to adjust to Tunisian management conditions following their first lactation. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 116 (3 ULg) Genetic parameters for Tunisian Holsteins using a test-day random regression model.Hammami, Hedi ; ; Soyeurt, Hélène et alin Journal of Dairy Science (2008), 91(5), 2118-26 Genetic parameters of milk, fat, and protein yields were estimated in the first 3 lactations for registered Tunisian Holsteins. Data included 140,187; 97,404; and 62,221 test-day production records ... [more ▼] Genetic parameters of milk, fat, and protein yields were estimated in the first 3 lactations for registered Tunisian Holsteins. Data included 140,187; 97,404; and 62,221 test-day production records collected on 22,538; 15,257; and 9,722 first-, second-, and third-parity cows, respectively. Records were of cows calving from 1992 to 2004 in 96 herds. (Co)variance components were estimated by Bayesian methods and a 3-trait-3-lactation random regression model. Gibbs sampling was used to obtain posterior distributions. The model included herd x test date, age x season of calving x stage of lactation [classes of 25 days in milk (DIM)], production sector x stage of lactation (classes of 5 DIM) as fixed effects, and random regression coefficients for additive genetic, permanent environmental, and herd-year of calving effects, which were defined as modified constant, linear, and quadratic Legendre coefficients. Heritability estimates for 305-d milk, fat and protein yields were moderate (0.12 to 0.18) and in the same range of parameters estimated in management systems with low to medium production levels. Heritabilities of test-day milk and protein yields for selected DIM were higher in the middle than at the beginning or the end of lactation. Inversely, heritabilities of fat yield were high at the peripheries of lactation. Genetic correlations among 305-d yield traits ranged from 0.50 to 0.86. The largest genetic correlation was observed between the first and second lactation, potentially due to the limited expression of genetic potential of superior cows in later lactations. Results suggested a lack of adaptation under the local management and climatic conditions. Results should be useful to implement a BLUP evaluation for the Tunisian cow population; however, results also indicated that further research focused on data quality might be needed. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 64 (4 ULg) Fitting lactation curves of dairy cattle in different types of herds in Tunisia; ; et al in Livestock Production Science (2003), 83(2-3), 309-315 The incomplete gamma function was used to fit lactation curves of Holstein-Friesian cows in four types of herds in Tunisia. A total of 8640 records were used in the analysis. These included 1269, 637, 239 ... [more ▼] The incomplete gamma function was used to fit lactation curves of Holstein-Friesian cows in four types of herds in Tunisia. A total of 8640 records were used in the analysis. These included 1269, 637, 239, and 498 first lactation and 2986, 1441, 650, and 920 second and later lactation records in four herd groups namely investors, state, cooperative, and farmers' herds, respectively. The effects of environmental variables, production sector, herd, parity, first test-day date, calving year, and calving season on the main lactation curve traits were analysed. The factors associated with milk yield at the beginning of lactation and the decreasing phase of the curve, persistency, and peak yield varied significantly (P<0.01) with all variables. The ascending phase of the lactation curve was not affected by parity and calving year, while days in milk until peak depended only on the rank of lactation. The state herds had the lowest peak and total yields. The summer season was unfavourable for milk production. In contrast to first lactation cows, third lactation cows had the highest peak and total yields. Milk yield was highly correlated with peak yield (r = 0.79) and was not related to persistency measure. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 101 (2 ULg) |
||