References of "Coucke, Philippe"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
See detailChemical Modifiers of Cancer Treatment
Coucke, Philippe ULg; Workman, Paul; Coleman, Norman

in Chemical Modifiers of Cancer Treatment (1995, August 22)

Detailed reference viewed: 1 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailMolecular basis of radioresistance
COUCKE, Philippe ULg

Doctoral thesis (1995)

Detailed reference viewed: 27 (15 ULg)
Full Text
See detailCombined radiotherapy and radioimmotherapy of human colon carcinoma grafted in nude mice.
Buchegger, F; Rojas, A; Delaloye, A et al

in Cancer Research (1995), 55

The effect of combined radioimmunotherapy (RIT) and fractionated external beam radiotherapy (RT) was assessed in two human colon cancer xenografts, Col 12 and LS174T in nude mice. These tumors were ... [more ▼]

The effect of combined radioimmunotherapy (RIT) and fractionated external beam radiotherapy (RT) was assessed in two human colon cancer xenografts, Col 12 and LS174T in nude mice. These tumors were selected for being resistant to RIT alone, as is usually the case in the clinical situation. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with a combination of five X-ray fractions over 5 days followed by RIT with two doses of 1.5 mCi 131I-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody F(ab')2. In Col 12 and LS174T, RIT alone achieved a regrowth delay similar to that of fractionated RT with total doses of 28 and 26 Gy, respectively. In both tumor types, an additive therapeutic effect, measured as increased regrowth delay or local control, was observed when combining RT of different dose levels with RIT. Normal tissue responses were assessed by monitoring acute peak skin reactions and blood cell count. Bone marrow depression for the combination treatment was similar to that of RIT alone; relative to skin, at equitoxic levels, no mice bearing Col 12 tumors were locally controlled with a 32 Gy RT dose alone, while this RT combined with RIT gave a local control of 100%. These studies show a therapeutic benefit when external beam RT is combined with RIT. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 12 (5 ULg)
Full Text
See detailAzidothymidine as a potential modifier of radiation-reponse
Copaceanu, M-L; COUCKE, Philippe ULg; Cottin, E et al

in Acta Oncologica (1995)

Abstract The potential effect of AZT as a thymidine analogue on radiation response in vitro was investigated. Two human cell lines (WiDr and HeLa) were used. The effect of 10 μM AZT on exponentially ... [more ▼]

Abstract The potential effect of AZT as a thymidine analogue on radiation response in vitro was investigated. Two human cell lines (WiDr and HeLa) were used. The effect of 10 μM AZT on exponentially growing cells was studied after different exposure times (24, 48 and 72 h). The surviving fraction (clonogenic assay) or metabolic activity (MTT assay) after irradiation of AZT-exposed cells, was compared to unexposed irradiated controls. Flow cytometry was used to assess the cell-cycle effect of pre-exposure of exponentially growing cells to AZT. AZT had a radioprotective effect for all experimental time points as far as WiDr was concerned. For HeLa the effect was significant at 24 h. Cell-cycle analysis showed a significant accumulation in S-phase at 72 h for WiDr. For HeLa there was a significant accumulation in S-phase at 48 h. We conclude that under the reported experimental conditions, AZT as a thymidine analogue seems to reduce the cytotoxic effect of irradiation. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 16 (5 ULg)
Full Text
See detailThe rationale to switch from postoperative hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy to preoperative hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in rectal cancer
COUCKE, Philippe ULg; Sartorelli, B; Cuttat, J-F et al

in International Journal of Radiation, Oncology, Biology, Physics (1995), 32(1), 181-188

To demonstrate the feasibility of preoperative Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radio Therapy (preop-HART) ini rectal cancer and to explain the rationales to switch from postoperative HART to preoperative ... [more ▼]

To demonstrate the feasibility of preoperative Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radio Therapy (preop-HART) ini rectal cancer and to explain the rationales to switch from postoperative HART to preoperative HART. View the MathML source: Fifty-two consecutive patients were introduced in successive Phase I trials since 1989. In trial 89-01, postoperative HART (48 Gy in 3 weeks) was applied in 20 patients. In nine patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, considered unresectable by the surgeon, 32 Gy in 2 weeks was applied prior to surgery (trial 89-02). Sicne 1991, 41.6 Gy in 2.5 weeks has been applied preoperative to 23 patients with T3—T4 any N recatl cancer immediately followed by surgery (trial 91-01). All patients were irradiated at the department of radiation-oncology with a four-field box technique (1.6 Gy twice a day and with at least a 6-h interval between fractions). The minimal accelerating potential was 6 MV. Acute toxicity was scored according to the World Health Organization (WHO for skin and small bowel) and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria (RTOG for bladder). This was done weekly during treatment and every 3 months thereafter. Small bowel volume was estimated by a modified “Gallagher's” method. View the MathML source: Acute toxicity was acceptable both in postoperative setup. The mean acute toxicity was significantly lower in trial 91-01 compared to 89-01. This difference was due to the smaller amount of small bowel in irradiation field and lower total dose in trial 91-01. Moreover, there was a significantly reduced delay between surgery and radiotherapy favoring trial 91-01 (median delay 4 days compared to 46 days in trial 89-01). Nearly all patients in trial 89-02 and 91-01 underwent surgery (31 out of 32; 97%). Resection margins were negative in 29 out of 32. Hospitalization duration in trial 91-01 was not significantly different from trial 89-01 (19 vs. 21 days, respectively). View the MathML source: Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy immediately followed by surgery is feasible as far as acute toxicity is concerned. Preoperative HART is favored by a significantly lower acute toxicity related, in part, to a smaller amount of irradiated small bowel, and a shorter duration of the delay between radiotherapy and surgery. Moreover, the hospital stay after preoperative HART is not significantly increased [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 7 (0 ULg)
Full Text
See detailNausea and vomiting in fractionated radiotherapy: a prospective on-demand trial of tropisetron rescue for non-responders to metoclopramide.
Miralbell, R; COUCKE, Philippe ULg; Behrouz, F et al

in European Journal of Cancer Prevention (1995)

A prospective trial was performed to better assess the risk of nausea and vomiting and the rescue value of tropisetron (TRO), a 5HT3 receptor antagonist, in 88 patients undergoing fractionated ... [more ▼]

A prospective trial was performed to better assess the risk of nausea and vomiting and the rescue value of tropisetron (TRO), a 5HT3 receptor antagonist, in 88 patients undergoing fractionated radiotherapy to the abdomen or to large supradiaphragmatic fields and failing a first anti-emetic trial with metoclopramide (MET). Nausea was graded 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) and 3 (severe). Nausea requiring anti-emetics (L grade 2) was present in 64% of the patients. MET was able to control nausea (I grade 1) in 26 of 58 patients (45%) who developed 1 grade 2 nausea during radiation treatment (2 patients vomiting without nausea included). 34 patients required TRO, and 31 experienced immediate relief. However, nausea (1 grade 2) recurred in 7 patients from 1 to 3 weeks after starting, TRO. Sex, age, field type and field size (cm*) did not influence the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting. Only 24188 patients vomited after starting radiotherapy. MET helped to eliminate emesis in one third of these patients. TRO helped to control vomiting in 73% of the salvaged patients. Constipation was observed in 8 patients on TRO and was a reason to stop the medication in 4 cases. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 16 (4 ULg)
Full Text
See detailThe rationale to switch from postoperative accelerated radiotherapy to preoperative hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in rectal cancer.
COUCKE, Philippe ULg; Sartirelli, Britta; Cuttat, Jean-François et al

in International Journal of Radiation, Oncology, Biology, Physics (1995), 32(1), 181-188

Purpose: To demonstrate the feasibility of preoperative Hyperfractionated Accelerated RadioTherapy (preop-HART) in rectal cancer and to explain the rationales to switch from postoperative HART to ... [more ▼]

Purpose: To demonstrate the feasibility of preoperative Hyperfractionated Accelerated RadioTherapy (preop-HART) in rectal cancer and to explain the rationales to switch from postoperative HART to preoperative HART. Methods and 1989. In trial Materials: Fifty-two consecutive patients were introduced in successive Phase I trials since 89-01. m&operative HART (48 Gv in 3 weeks) was applied in 20 patients. In nine patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, considered unresectable by the surgeon, 32 Gy in 2 weeks was-applied prior to surgery (trial 89-02). Since 1991, 41.6 Gy in 2.5 weeks has been applied preoperatively to 23 patients with T3-T4 any N rectal cancer immediately followed by surgery (trial 91-01). All patients were irradiated at the department of radiation-oncology with a four-field box technique (1.6 Gy twice a day and with at least a 6-h interval between fractions). The minimal accelerating potential was 6 MV. Acute toxicity was scored according to the World Health Organization (WHO for skin and small bowel) and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria (RTOG for bladder). This was done weekly during treatment and every 3 months thereafter. Small bowel volume was estimated by a modiiied “Gallagher’s” method. Results: Acute toxicity was acceptable both in postoperative and preoperative setup. The mean acute toxicity ~significantly lower in trial 91-01 compared to 89-01. This difference was due to the smaller amount of small bowel in irradiation field and lower total dose in trial 91-01. Moreover, there was a significantly reduced delay between surgery and radiotherapy favoring trial 91-01 (median delay 4 days compared to 46 days in trial 89-01). Nearly all patients in trial 89-02 and 91-01 underwent surgery (31 out of 32; 97%). Resection margins were negative in 29 out of 32. Hospitalization duration in trial 91-01 was not significantly different from trial 89-01 (19 vs. 21 days, respectively). Conclusions: Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy immediately followed by surgery is feasible as far as acute toxicity is concerned. Preoperative HART is favored by a significantly lower acute toxicity related, in part, to a smaller amount of irradiated small bowel, and a shorter duration of the delay between radiotherapy and surgery. Moreover, the hospital stay after preoperative HART is not significantly increased. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 15 (2 ULg)
See detailLe traitement oncologique : polémique ou consensus ?
Coucke, Philippe ULg; MARTY

in Médecine et Hygiène (1995), 53(2076), 1371-1377

Les avis en oncologie sont souvent divergents. Ils illustrent un manque de «standard» thérapeutique bien établi. Cette revue a pour but de définir certaines de ces divergences fortement colorées par la ... [more ▼]

Les avis en oncologie sont souvent divergents. Ils illustrent un manque de «standard» thérapeutique bien établi. Cette revue a pour but de définir certaines de ces divergences fortement colorées par la spécialisation du médecin consulté. Ces divergences cesseront d'exister à condition de conduire des essais randomisés. Le praticien généraliste a un rôle prépondérant à jouer dans la motivation des malades afin qu'ils acceptent l'idée de ce genre d'étude. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 9 (0 ULg)
See detailRadiochirurgie et radiothérapie stéréotaxique
Coucke, Philippe ULg; FANKHAUSER

in Médecine et Hygiène (1995), 53(2088), 2002--2009

La radiochirurgie, appelée radiothérapie stéréotaxique lorsqu'il s'agit d'un traitement fractionné, s'effectue en Suisse depuis 1993, soit par accélérateur linéaire modifié, soit par Gamma Knife. Par ... [more ▼]

La radiochirurgie, appelée radiothérapie stéréotaxique lorsqu'il s'agit d'un traitement fractionné, s'effectue en Suisse depuis 1993, soit par accélérateur linéaire modifié, soit par Gamma Knife. Par cette technique on arrive à administrer une dose élevée de radiations à des lésions intracrâniennes circonscrites d'une taille de 3 à 4 cm au maximum, tout en ménageant les tissus normaux avoisinants. Lorsque les lésions sont plus grandes, mal délimitées, ou de forme irrégulière, c'est la radiothérapie conventionnelle et conformationnelle qui offre une meilleure répartition des doses. Les principales lésions considérées pour la radiochirurgie sont les malformations artérioveineuses, les métastases cérébrales solitaires, les méningiomes de la base, les schwannomes vestibulaires et certaines récidives focales de gliomes. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 28 (0 ULg)
See detailPrimary cerebral lymphoma. A retrospective study of 27 cases
Grangier, C; COUCKE, Philippe ULg; Baur, A et al

in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie (1994), 170(4), 206-212

Primary cerebral lymphoma is a rare disease. The aim of this study is to compare the survival of the patients treated with radiotherapy alone vs. patients treated with a combined schedule of radio ... [more ▼]

Primary cerebral lymphoma is a rare disease. The aim of this study is to compare the survival of the patients treated with radiotherapy alone vs. patients treated with a combined schedule of radio-chemotherapy. Our results will be compared with currently published data and main prognostic factors will be briefly discussed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1974 and 1990, 27 cases of primary cerebral lymphoma were diagnosed at our institution. All patients had biopsy-proven disease, the pathology of which was reviewed for this study. RESULTS: The overall median survival time was 24 months and one-, two- and three-year overall survival was 59, 46 and 29% respectively. The median radiation dose was 46 Gy, ranging from 19.5 to 60 Gy. The median dose per fraction was 2 Gy (ranging from 1.61 to 3 Gy). The median elapsed treatment time was 32 days (ranging from three to 45 days). We were not able to demonstrate any statistically significant difference between patients who received radiotherapy alone (n = 14, median survival time = 24 months) and those who received a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (n = 11, median survival time = 30 months), (p = 0.4). Prognostic factors of survival were tested using a univariate analysis (Wilcoxon test). Parameters such as mass appearance (unilobular, p = 0.048), performance status at the time of the diagnosis (0 to 1, p = 0.014), and CT imaging (hypodense, p = 0.043) influenced positively survival. Centroblastic histology (Kiel) was found associated with a negative prognosis (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: In our experience, there is no statistically significant difference of survival between patients treated with radiotherapy alone or with a combined treatment of radio-chemotherapy. Other prognostic factors of survival were discovered, although the analysis was univariate, due to the limited number of patients. Multicentric prospective studies should be elaborated in order to optimize the treatment of this disease. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 3 (0 ULg)
See detailProtection of the small bowel with a silicone tissue expander prosthesis and a polyglycolic acid mesh during radiation therapy for cervical carcinoma
Delaloye, J-F; Cuttat, J-F; COUCKE, Philippe ULg et al

in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (1994), 101

Detailed reference viewed: 3 (0 ULg)
See detailEfficacité de la radiothérapie pour le traitement des récidives en gynécologie oncologique
COUCKE, Philippe ULg; Sartorelli, B

in Revue Médicale de la Suisse Romande (1994), 114(9), 799-804

Detailed reference viewed: 1 (0 ULg)
See detailL'hyperthermie, une modalité oncologique pluridisciplinaire
Coucke, Philippe ULg; GUILLEMIN; RAIMONDI et al

in Médecine et Hygiène (1994), 52(2037), 1720-1722

L-hyperthermie consiste en l'élévation de la température du corps ou d'une de ses parties, par des moyens externes au-delà de 41°C. La chaleur a une activité cytotoxique propre et provoque une ... [more ▼]

L-hyperthermie consiste en l'élévation de la température du corps ou d'une de ses parties, par des moyens externes au-delà de 41°C. La chaleur a une activité cytotoxique propre et provoque une sensibilisation des cellules aux radiations ionisantes ou à la chimiothérapie. Le gain thérapeutique est environ de 2. Seules les tumeurs superficielles peuvent être traitées adéquatement par les moyens actuels. Les indications sont la palliation de tumeurs superficielles telles que les récidives loco-régionales du cancer du sein, les récidives ganglionnaires de cancers ORL et les cancers de la peau, en particulier les mélanomes [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 56 (0 ULg)
Full Text
See detailAdjuvant postoperative accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy in rectal cancer : a feasability study
Coucke, Philippe ULg; Cuttat, J-F; Mirimanoff, R-O

in International Journal of Radiation, Oncology, Biology, Physics (1993), 24(4), 885-889

To assess the acute toxicity and hence feasibility of postoperative hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients were submitted to accelerated ... [more ▼]

To assess the acute toxicity and hence feasibility of postoperative hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients were submitted to accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy after resection of rectal cancer. A total dose of 48 Gy was given in 3 weeks. Two fractions of 1.6 Gy were used with a mean interfraction interval of at least 6 hours. The pelvic volume was treated by a four-field box technique using a linear accelerator (6-18 MV). Acute toxicity was assessed once per week. Small bowel and skin toxicity were scored according to the criteria of the World Health Organization. Bladder toxicity was scored according to the criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. RESULTS: All the patients underwent the treatment as planned except one. No patient presented grade 3 or 4 bladder toxicity. There was only one patient who complained from grade 3 skin toxicity at the end of the treatment. Fourteen patients had some degree of intestinal toxicity. This was the most frequently occurring acute side-effect. Only two out of the fourteen patients had intestinal toxicity exceeding grade 2. CONCLUSION: Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy on a pelvic volume is feasible [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 14 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailPrognosis of human chorionic gonadotropin-producing seminoma treated by postoperative radiotherapy
Mirimanoff, R-O; Sinzig, M; Krüger, M et al

in International Journal of Radiation, Oncology, Biology, Physics (1993), 27(1), 17-24

To clarify the controversy about the management and prognosis of human chorionic gonadotropin-producing seminoma, the records of 132 patients with abnormal human chorionic gonadotropin values treated with ... [more ▼]

To clarify the controversy about the management and prognosis of human chorionic gonadotropin-producing seminoma, the records of 132 patients with abnormal human chorionic gonadotropin values treated with radiotherapy were analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 1169 patients with pure seminoma treated in 10 institutions were screened for serum or urinary human chorionic gonadotropin. One hundred and thirty two patients with elevated human chorionic gonadotropin were found: 96 Stage I, 20 IIA, 7 IIB, 8 III and 1 IV. Median age was 34 y., mean follow-up was 5.0 years [range 1-12 y]. All received infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy (median dose 30 Gy), 25 (2 Stage I, 11 IIA, 5 IIB and 7 III) supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy (median dose: 28.5 Gy) and 10 had also initial chemotherapy (3 Stage IIB 6 III and 1 IV). Patients were allocated to three groups according to human chorionic gonadotropin values: (a) moderate elevation: up to 10 times (104 pts), (b) high elevation: 10 to 100 times (20 pts), (c) very high elevation: over 100 times the upper limit of normal value (8 pts). RESULTS: The proportion of Stage I, II and III was 76%, 19%, 5% in the ME group versus 50%, 35%, 15% in the high elevation group (p < 0.05). In the very high elevation group there were 7 Stage I and 1 Stage IV. Of 132 patients, six died (three dead of disease, two suicides, one acquired immunodeficiency syndrome). The 5 years overall survival probability was 94%. There were seven recurrences (initial stage: 1 Stage I, 2 IIB, 3 III and 1 IV). Of these, there were one in-field recurrence, 3 out of field and 3 in both sites. In 5 of 7, the human chorionic gonadotrophin level was again elevated at recurrence. The 5 years recurrence-free-survival probability was 94% (98% for Stage I, 100% for Stage IIA and 65% for Stage IIB and III [p < 0.001 between I and IIB + III, p < 0.05 between IIA and IIB + III]). Four of the 7 recurrences were salvaged by chimiotherapy +/- radiotherapy. In the high elevation and very high elevation groups, the 5 years recurrence-free-survival was 88%, vs. 96% for the moderate elevation group (p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Based on this series of patients, human chorionic gonadotropin production is not an unfavorable prognostic factor in pure seminoma. Even in the subgroups with high or very high human chorionic gonadotropin levels (who had a higher proportion of advanced stages), the prognosis remained excellent. In Stage I and IIA seminoma with abnormal human chorionic gonadotropin levels, recurrence rate after post-operative radiotherapy alone is extremely low. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (0 ULg)
See detailHypofractionation in retinoblastoma: an increased risk of retinopathy.
Coucke, Philippe ULg; Schmid; Balmer et al

in Radiotherapy & Oncology (1993), 28(2), 157-161

Detailed reference viewed: 11 (0 ULg)
Full Text
See detailThird-body irradiation as an effective palliative treatment for painful multiple bone metastases resistant to chemo- or hormonal treatment
Douglas, P; Rossier, Ph.; Mirimanoff, R-O et al

in Radiotherapy & Oncology (1993), 28(1), 76-78

Fifty-three patients had 54 third-body areas irradiated for breast and prostate bone metastases using the third-body irradiation technique during a period of 6 years. These patients were previously ... [more ▼]

Fifty-three patients had 54 third-body areas irradiated for breast and prostate bone metastases using the third-body irradiation technique during a period of 6 years. These patients were previously treated with chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and limited field irradiation. Seventy percent responded completely and 24% partially. This modality is safe and effective for pain relief. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 4 (0 ULg)
See detailLa cinétique cellulaire tumorale: aspects cliniques «à la recherche du temps perdu»
Coucke, Philippe ULg; Paschoud, N

in Bulletin du Cancer. Radiothérapie : Journal de la Société Française du Cancer : Organe de la Société Française de Radiothérapie Oncologique (1993), 80(4), 431-437

Detailed reference viewed: 12 (0 ULg)
See detailLa place de la radiothérapie dans le traitement des sarcomes des tissus mous
Coucke, Philippe ULg; Guillemin, C-L

in Bulletin du Cancer. Radiothérapie : Journal de la Société Française du Cancer : Organe de la Société Française de Radiothérapie Oncologique (1993), 80(1), 13-26

La radiothérapie des sarcomes des tissus mous est revue à travers la littérature. Comme la chirurgie, le traitement actinique fait partie du traitement standard. Comparée à la radiothérapie postopératoire ... [more ▼]

La radiothérapie des sarcomes des tissus mous est revue à travers la littérature. Comme la chirurgie, le traitement actinique fait partie du traitement standard. Comparée à la radiothérapie postopératoire, l'approche préopératoire et/ou interstitielle offre l'avantage potentiel de nécessiter de façon plus systématique une approche multidisciplinaire ab initio. Par ailleurs, la radiothérapie préopératoire implique une irradiation des tissus sains moins importante et donc une réduction probable de la toxicité. Le contrôle local et la survie sont comparables pour les deux modalités radiothérapeutiques. Toutefois, la comparaison entre différentes séries reste ardue vu l'hétérogénéité des populations étudiées. Une solution serait d'effectuer une étude randomisée [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 9 (0 ULg)
Full Text
See detailHypofractionation in retinoblastoma: an increased risk of retinopathy.
Coucke, Philippe ULg; Mirimanoff, R-O; Schmid, C et al

in Radiotherapy & Oncology (1993), 28

Forty-four eyes in 38 children were treated between 1963 and 1991 by external radiotherapy for retinoblastoma. Treatment modalities varied widely during this period; in addition to radiotherapy there was ... [more ▼]

Forty-four eyes in 38 children were treated between 1963 and 1991 by external radiotherapy for retinoblastoma. Treatment modalities varied widely during this period; in addition to radiotherapy there was chemotherapy (16/44), photocoagulation (14/44), and laser therapy or cryotherapy (14/44). Treatment technique and dose fractionation also varied widely; lateral beam technique (39/44) versus anterior or anterior/lateral beam; doses per fraction ranged from 1 to 4.5 Gy, total doses from 30 to 61.5 Gy, and overall times from 22 to 49 days. Patients were followed at 3-month intervals, and actuarial survival at 10 years was 88%, with 62% local control. Ten eyes showed clinical evidence of retinopathy. A multivariate analysis of factors associated with increased risk of retinopathy was carried out using the Cox proportional hazards model and the mixture model of Farewell. The estimated latent time was 17 months (95% confidence interval, 14-20 months). The only factors found to be significantly associated with retinopathy were total dose multiplied by dose per fraction, or total dose normalized to the equivalent total dose in 2-Gy fractions as estimated from the LQ model, and these gave equivalent descriptions. There were trends (not significant) for increased risk of retinopathy when treatments included chemotherapy or photocoagulation, and for decreased risk (also not significant) when cryotherapy was used in conjunction with radiotherapy. No significance could be attached to any of the following: number of sites per eye, Reese-Ellsworth stage, and family history. We conclude that hypofractionation carries a significant risk for retinopathy in the treatment of retinoblastoma. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 8 (2 ULg)