References of "Cooper, C"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
See detailIbandronate for the prevention of nonvertebral fractures: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.
Cranney, Ann; Wells, G. A.; Yetisir, E. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2009), 20(2), 291-7

SUMMARY: This analysis was conducted to assess the effect of high versus lower doses of ibandronate on nonvertebral fractures. The results were adjusted for clinical fracture, age, and bone density. The ... [more ▼]

SUMMARY: This analysis was conducted to assess the effect of high versus lower doses of ibandronate on nonvertebral fractures. The results were adjusted for clinical fracture, age, and bone density. The treatment effect was dose-dependent. Higher doses of ibandronate significantly reduced the risk of nonvertebral fractures more effectively compared with lower doses. INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of different doses of ibandronate on nonvertebral fractures in a pooled analysis. METHODS: Eight randomized trials of ibandronate were reviewed for inclusion. Alternative definitions of high versus low doses based on annual cumulative exposure (ACE) were explored. A time-to-event analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived using Cox regression and adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: Combining higher ACE doses of > or = 10.8 mg (150 mg once monthly, 3 mg i.v. quarterly, and 2 mg i.v. every 2 months) versus ACE doses of 5.5 mg, from two trials, resulted in an HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.396-0.974, p = 0.038). There was a dose-response trend with increasing ACE doses (7.2-12 mg) versus ACE of 5.5 mg. CONCLUSIONS: A dose-response effect on nonvertebral fractures was observed when comparing high with low ACE doses. A significant reduction in nonvertebral fractures was noted when pooling data from trials using ACE doses of > or = 10.8 mg versus ACE < or = 7.2 mg; and with ACE > or = 10.8 mg versus ACE of 5.5 mg (38% reduction). Higher ibandronate dose levels (150 mg monthly or 3 mg i.v. quarterly) significantly reduced nonvertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 56 (4 ULg)
Full Text
See detailThe International Osteoporosis Foundation: history, objectives and achievements.
Cooper, C.; Rizzoli, R.; Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg

in Osteoporosis International (2009), 20 Suppl 3

Detailed reference viewed: 18 (3 ULg)
Full Text
See detailEuropean guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
Kanis, J. A.; Burlet, N.; Cooper, C. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2008), 19(4), 399-428

SUMMARY: Guidance is provided in a European setting on the assessment and treatment of postmenopausal women with or at risk from osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION: The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and ... [more ▼]

SUMMARY: Guidance is provided in a European setting on the assessment and treatment of postmenopausal women with or at risk from osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION: The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone disease (subsequently the International Osteoporosis Foundation) published guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in 1997. This manuscript updates these in a European setting. METHODS: The following areas are reviewed: the role of bone mineral density measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk; general and pharmacological management of osteoporosis; monitoring of treatment; assessment of fracture risk; case finding strategies; investigation of patients; health economics of treatment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A platform is provided on which specific guidelines can be developed for national use. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 61 (9 ULg)
Full Text
See detailThe MOBILE study long-term extension: progressive improvements in efficacy with oral ibandronate (1500mg) when administered monthly
Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg; Cooper, C.; Sedarati, F. et al

in Calcified Tissue International (2007, May), 80(Suppl.1), 144

Detailed reference viewed: 6 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailEfficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2 year results from the MOBILE study
Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg; Adami, S.; Lakatos, P. et al

in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2006), 65(5), 654-661

BACKGROUND: Reducing bisphosphonate dosing frequency may improve suboptimal adherence to treatment and therefore therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Once-monthly oral ibandronate has been ... [more ▼]

BACKGROUND: Reducing bisphosphonate dosing frequency may improve suboptimal adherence to treatment and therefore therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Once-monthly oral ibandronate has been developed to overcome this problem. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the 1 year results and provide more extensive safety and tolerability information for once-monthly dosing by a 2 year analysis. METHODS: MOBILE, a randomised, phase III, non-inferiority study, compared the efficacy and safety of once-monthly ibandronate with daily ibandronate, which has previously been shown to reduce vertebral fracture risk in comparison with placebo. RESULTS: 1609 postmenopausal women were randomised. Substantial increases in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) were seen in all treatment arms: 5.0%, 5.3%, 5.6%, and 6.6% in the daily and once-monthly groups (50 + 50 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg), respectively. It was confirmed that all once-monthly regimens were at least as effective as daily treatment, and in addition, 150 mg was found to be better (p<0.001). Substantial increases in proximal femur (total hip, femoral neck, trochanter) BMD were seen; 150 mg produced the most pronounced effect (p<0.05 versus daily treatment). Independent of the regimen, most participants (70.5-93.5%) achieved increases above baseline in lumbar spine or total hip BMD, or both. Pronounced decreases in the biochemical marker of bone resorption, sCTX, observed in all arms after 3 months, were maintained throughout. The 150 mg regimen consistently produced greater increases in BMD and sCTX suppression than the 100 mg and daily regimens. Ibandronate was well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-monthly oral ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as daily treatment. Once-monthly administration may be more convenient for patients and improve therapeutic adherence, thereby optimising outcomes. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 11 (4 ULg)
Full Text
See detailAddressing the musculoskeletal components of fracture risk with calcium and vitamin D: A review of the evidence
Boonen, S.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H. A.; Cooper, C. et al

in Calcified Tissue International (2006), 78(5), 257-270

Osteoporotic fractures are an extremely common and serious health problem in the elderly. This article presents the rationale for calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the prevention and treatment of ... [more ▼]

Osteoporotic fractures are an extremely common and serious health problem in the elderly. This article presents the rationale for calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the prevention and treatment of osteoporotic fractures and reviews the literature evidence on the efficacy of this strategy. Two musculoskeletal risk factors are implicated in osteoporotic fractures in the elderly: the loss of bone mass due to secondary hyperparathyroidism and the increased propensity to falls. Calcium and vitamin D reverse secondary hyperparathyroidism with resultant beneficial effects on bone mineral density (BMD). Additionally, calcium and vitamin D supplementation significantly improves body sway and lower extremity strength, reducing the risk of falls. The effects of combined calcium and vitamin D on parathyroid function and BMD provide a strong rationale for the use of this therapy in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. There is general agreement that, in patients with documented osteoporosis, calcium and vitamin D supplementation should be an integral component of the management strategy, along with antiresorptive or anabolic treatment. Frail elderly individuals constitute another major target population for calcium and vitamin D because evidence from randomized studies in institutionalized elderly subjects demonstrates that these supplements reduce osteoporotic fracture risk, particularly in the presence of dietary deficiencies. However, the results of trials in community-dwelling subjects have been equivocal. Within the primary-care setting, further research is required to establish appropriate target subgroups for calcium and vitamin D supplementation; overall, the data are consistent with a benefit individuals with insufficient calcium and/or vitamin D, although patients with documented osteoporosis will derive further benefit in terms of fracture prevention from the addition of an antiresorptive agent. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailOnce-monthly and daily oral ibandronate are at least as effective in improving proximal femur BMD in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 12-month data from MOBILE
Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg; Lorenc, R.; Stepan, J. J. et al

in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2005, June), 64(Suppl.III), 93

Detailed reference viewed: 2 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailTwo-year efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the MOBILE study
Cooper, C.; Delmas, P. D.; Felsenberg, D. et al

in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2005, June), 64(Suppl.III), 68

Detailed reference viewed: 10 (5 ULg)
Full Text
See detailTreatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis is worthwhile. The position of the International Osteoporosis Foundation
Delmas, P. D.; Rizzoli, R.; Cooper, C. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2005), 16(1), 1-5

Detailed reference viewed: 7 (3 ULg)
Full Text
See detailMonthly oral ibandronate is at least as effective as daily oral ibandronate in increasing hip BMD in postmenopausal osteoporosis : 1-year results from mobile
Cooper, C.; Stepan, J. J.; Lorenc, R. et al

in BONE (2005), 36(S2), 417

Detailed reference viewed: 2 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailA novel bisphosphonate dosing regimen: once-monthly oral ibandronate
Cooper, C.; Adami, Silvio; Stepan, J. J. et al

in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2004, June)

Detailed reference viewed: 4 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailLong-term efficacy of risedronate: a 5-year placebo-controlled clinical experience
Sorensen, O. H.; Crawford, G. M.; Mulder, H. et al

in BONE (2003), 32(2), 120-126

Limited placebo-controlled data are available to assess the long-term fracture efficacy of bisphosphonates. In order to determine the effects of 5 years of risedronate treatment, we extended a 3-year ... [more ▼]

Limited placebo-controlled data are available to assess the long-term fracture efficacy of bisphosphonates. In order to determine the effects of 5 years of risedronate treatment, we extended a 3-year, placebo-controlled vertebral fracture study in osteoporotic women for an additional 2 years; women who entered the extension study continued to receive 5 mg risedronate or placebo according to the original randomization, with maintenance of blinding. End points included vertebral and nonvertebral fracture assessments, bone mineral density measurements, and changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover. A total of 265 women (placebo, 130; 5 mg risedronate, 135) entered the study extension and 220 (83%) completed the additional 2 years. Fracture results observed in the study extension were consistent with those observed in the first 3 years. The risk of new vertebral fractures was significantly reduced with risedronate treatment in years 4 and 5 by 59% (95% confidence interval, 19 to 79%, P = 0.01) compared with a 49% reduction in the first 3 years. Rapid and significant decreases in markers of bone turnover observed in the first 3 years were similarly maintained in the next 2 years of treatment. Increases in spine and hip bone mineral density that occurred in the risedronate group during the first 3 years were maintained or increased with a further 2 years of treatment. The mean increase from baseline in lumbar spine BMD over 5 years was 9.3% (P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that the effects of risedronate over 3 years on vertebral fracture and BMD are maintained with a further 2 years of treatment. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 31 (4 ULg)
Full Text
See detailRapid and sustained hip fracture risk reduction with risedronate in elderly women with osteoporosis
Cooper, C; Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg; McClung, M et al

in BONE (2001), S28

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailRapid and sustained effects of risedronate in reducting hip fracture risk in elderly women with osteoporis
Seeman, E; McClung, M; Zippel, H et al

in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (2000), 15(S1), 149

Detailed reference viewed: 5 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailQuality of life in patients with vertebral fractures : validation of the quality of life questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. (QUALEFFO)
Lips, P; Cooper, C; Agnusdei, D et al

in Osteoporosis International (1999), 10

Detailed reference viewed: 3 (0 ULg)
Full Text
See detailQuality of life as outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis : The development of a questionnaire for quality of life by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis
Lips, P; Cooper, C; Agnusdei, D et al

in Osteoporosis International (1997), 7

Detailed reference viewed: 8 (4 ULg)
Full Text
See detailThe development of a European questionnaire for quality of life in patients with vertebral osteoporosis
Lips, P; Agnusdei, D; Caulin, F et al

in Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology (1996), 25(103), 84-85

Detailed reference viewed: 4 (2 ULg)
Full Text
See detailRecommendations for registration of drugs used in the treatment of osteoarthritis
Dougados, M; Devogelaer, JP; Annefeldt, M et al

in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (1996), 55

Detailed reference viewed: 3 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailThe validation of the EFFO questionnaire for quality of life in patients with vertebral osteoporosis (QUALEFFO)
Lips, P; Agnusdei, D; Caulin, F et al

in Osteoporosis International (1996), 6(S1), 227

Detailed reference viewed: 4 (1 ULg)