Cost-utility of strontium ranelate for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women

in Osteoporosis International (2009, March), 20(S1), 129

Relationship between changes in bone mineral density and vertebral fracture incidence: an analysis of the last 3 years of an 8-year treatment with strontium ranelate

in Osteoporosis International (2009, March), 20(Suppl.1), 11

Association between changes in bone mineral density and fracture incidence in postmenopausal women receiving calcium and vitamin D : A 3-year study.

in Osteoporosis International (2009, March), 20(Suppl.1), 87-88

Glucosamine sulfate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: impact on health utility.

in Osteoporosis International (2009, March), 20(Suppl.1), 149

Highest prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy in institutionalized women compared with noninstitutionalized women: a case-control study.

in Women's Health (2009), 5(1), 49-54

The reduced capacity of older skin to synthesize vitamin D(3) under the influence of ultraviolet light makes older persons at risk of vitamin D deficiency. The risk could even be increased in ... [more ▼]

The reduced capacity of older skin to synthesize vitamin D(3) under the influence of ultraviolet light makes older persons at risk of vitamin D deficiency. The risk could even be increased in institutionalized persons owing to their lower sunshine exposure. It has been reported that an inadequate vitamin D level is associated with secondary hyperparathyroidism, increased bone turnover, and bone loss, which increase fracture risk. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of inadequate serum vitamin D levels in institutionalized, postmenopausal, osteoporotic women. Assessment of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] was performed in 445 institutionalized, osteoporotic women from nine countries (Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Spain and UK). For each institutionalized woman, three age-matched, noninstitutionalized, osteoporotic controls were also included. Four cutoffs of 25(OH)D inadequacy were fixed: less than 80, less than 75, less than 50 and less than 30 nmol/l. Mean age was 79.7 years (standard deviation [SD] = 5.8) for the institutionalized women and 79.5 years (SD = 5.5) for the noninstitutionalized women (p = 0.45). Significantly fewer institutionalized women received vitamin D supplements (13.2 vs 24.0%; p < 0.0001). In women without vitamin D supplements, the level of 25(OH)D was significantly lower in institutionalized women (56.9 [SD = 23.9] nmol/l) compared with noninstitutionalized women (63.2 [SD = 22.0] nmol/l; p < 0.0001). In institutionalized women (without vitamin D supplements), the prevalence of 25(OH)D inadequacy was 10.4, 41.2, 80.3 and 84.2% when considering cutoffs of 80, 75, 50 and 30 nmol/l, respectively. In the control group, the prevalence was 2.7, 22.9, 74.4 and 81.7%, respectively. The prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy was significantly higher in institutionalized women when considering the 75, 50 and 30 nmol/l cutoffs but not when considering the 80 nmol/l cutoff. This study highlights a high prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy in institutionalized, osteoporotic women. Compared with age-matched osteoporotic controls, the prevalence of severe vitamin D inadequacy was substantially more important in institutionalized women. We believe that a greater awareness of the importance of vitamin D inadequacy is needed in order to address this public health problem. [less ▲]

Efficacite anti-fracturaire de l'ibandronate administre par voie intraveineuse: de la complexite des etudes epidemiologiques interventionnelles a la pratique quotidienne.

in Revue Médicale de Liège (2009), 64(10), 525-9

Numerous epidemiological approaches are used to demonstrate the efficacy of a new chemical entity. In postmenopausal osteoporosis, anti-fracture efficacy can be assessed through prospective, randomized ... [more ▼]

Numerous epidemiological approaches are used to demonstrate the efficacy of a new chemical entity. In postmenopausal osteoporosis, anti-fracture efficacy can be assessed through prospective, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses or real-life setting studies. Intravenous ibandronate was recently marketed, with the aim of optimizing drug absorption and adherence to treatment. Furthermore, this new formulation avoids gastrointestinal side effects and constrains linked to the oral intake of the medication. Spinal anti-fracture efficacy of IV ibandronate derives from a non-inferiority bridging study, using surrogate endpoints, i.e., bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover, compared to the oral daily formulation, previously registered for the treatment of osteoporosis in Europe. Coherent results from two separate meta-analyses have suggested that the non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy of IV ibandronate is similar to that observed with oral, daily and weekly bisphosphonates. Similarly, a recent real-life setting study, based on claims from an US database, suggests that hip fractures are reduced, with IV ibandronate, to the same extend as they are with oral bisphosphonates. Notwithstanding, those results should probably be confirmed in an European setting, before being extrapolated, in daily practice, to the Belgian population. [less ▲]

Rationalisation du remboursement des médicaments de l'ostéoporose : de la mesure isolée de la densité osseuse à l'intégration des facteurs cliniques de risque fracturaire. Validation de l'algorithme FRAX(r)

in Revue du Rhumatisme (2009), 76

Relations entre les variations de densité minérale osseuse et l'incidence des fractures vertébrales: analyse des 3 dernières années d'un traitement de 8 ans sous ranélate de strontium.

in Revue du Rhumatisme (2009), 76

Management of osteoporosis in the elderly.

in Current Medical Research & Opinion (2009), 25(10), 2373-2387

ABSTRACT Background: Osteoporosis is predominantly a condition of the elderly, and the median age for hip fracture in women is approximately 83 years. Osteoporotic fracture risk is multifactorial, and ... [more ▼]

ABSTRACT Background: Osteoporosis is predominantly a condition of the elderly, and the median age for hip fracture in women is approximately 83 years. Osteoporotic fracture risk is multifactorial, and often involves the balance between bone strength and propensity for falling. Objective: To present an overview of the available evidence, located primarily by Medline searches up to April, 2009, for the different management strategies aimed at reducing the risk of falls and osteoporotic fractures in the elderly. Results: Frailty is an independent predictor of falls, hip fractures, hospitalisation, disability and death in the elderly that is receiving increasing attention. Non-pharmacological strategies to reduce fall risk can prevent osteoporotic fractures. Exercise programmes, especially those involving high doses of exercise and incorporating balance training, have been shown to be effective. Many older people, especially the very elderly and those living in care institutions, have vitamin D inadequacy. In appropriate patients and given in sufficient doses, vitamin D and calcium supplementation is effective in reducing both falls and osteoporotic fractures, including hip fractures. Specific anti-osteoporosis drugs are underused, even in those most at risk of osteoporotic fracture. The evidence base for the efficacy of most such drugs in the elderly is incomplete, particularly with regard to nonvertebral and hip fractures. The evidence base is perhaps most complete for the relatively recently introduced drug, strontium ranelate. Non-adherence to treatment is a substantial problem, and may be exacerbated by the requirements for safe oral administration of bisphosphonates. Conclusion: Evidence-based strategies are available for reducing osteoporotic fracture risk in the elderly, and include exercise training, vitamin D and calcium supplementation, and use of evidence-based anti-osteoporotic drugs. A positive and determined approach to optimising the use of such strategies could reduce the burden of osteoporotic fractures in this high-risk group. [less ▲]

Impact of chondroitin sulphate on health utility in patients with knee osteoarthritis: towards economic analysis.

in Journal of Medical Economics (2009), 12(4), 356-360

Abstract Objectives: The first objective was to assess the effect of the chondroitin 4 and 6 sulphate (CS) on health-related quality of life using utility values in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA ... [more ▼]

Abstract Objectives: The first objective was to assess the effect of the chondroitin 4 and 6 sulphate (CS) on health-related quality of life using utility values in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) during a 24-month treatment course. The second objective was, using these data, to conduct economic analyses. Methods: Data from the STOPP study was used. This study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo (PL) -controlled trial of 2-year duration. In the STOPP study, authors assessed quality of life using the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). WOMAC scores were translated into Health Utility Index (HUI) scores using a specific formula. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated taking into account the cost of CS and its effect on HUI scores, compared to PL. Results: At baseline, the mean (SD) HUI scores were 0.59 (0.17), and 0.59 (0.18) for the PL and CS groups, respectively (p=0.31 between the two groups). The mean (SD) HUI scores changes from baseline to 6 months were 0.02 (0.02), and 0.05 (0.01) for the PL and CS groups, respectively (p=0.03). After 24 months of follow-up, HUI score increases by 0.04 (0.02) in the PL group and by 0.05 (0.02) in the CS group (p=0.37). Using the price bracket of CS in Europe, ICER assessment always resulted in a cost below euro30,000 per QALY gained, after 6, 12 and 24 months of treatment. Conclusion: CS treatment increases health utilities in patients with knee OA compared to PL over the first 6 months of treatment. Economic evaluation based on these data suggests that CS treatment could be considered as cost-effective in patients with knee OA up to a period of 24 months. A limitation in this study is the absence of direct utility assessment as well as the absence of effective treatment as comparator. [less ▲]