References of "Bruyère, Olivier"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Peer Reviewed
See detailIntérêt du Start Back Screening Tool pour les médecins généralistes
Demoulin, Christophe ULg; Mahieu, Geneviève; Hill, JC et al

in Abstract Book of 6th Biennial Congress Belgian Back Society (2012, November 17)

Detailed reference viewed: 8 (1 ULg)
Full Text
See detailNécessité de nouveaux critères de remboursement pour traiter l'ostéoporose en Belgique
Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Bergmann, Pierre; Body, Jean-Jacques et al

in Ortho-Rhumato (2012), 10(5), 3

Detailed reference viewed: 28 (4 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailRole of glucosamine in the treatment for osteoarthritis.
REGINSTER, Jean-Yves ULg; Neuprez, Audrey ULg; LECART, Marie-Paule ULg et al

in Rheumatology International (2012), 32(10), 2959-67

Over the last 20 years, several studies have investigated the ability of glucosamine sulfate to improve the symptoms (pain and function) and to delay the structural progression of osteoarthritis. There is ... [more ▼]

Over the last 20 years, several studies have investigated the ability of glucosamine sulfate to improve the symptoms (pain and function) and to delay the structural progression of osteoarthritis. There is now a large, convergent body of evidence that glucosamine sulfate, given at a daily oral dose of 1,500 mg, is able to significantly reduce the symptoms of osteoarthritis in the lower limbs. This dose of glucosamine sulfate has also been shown, in two independent studies, to prevent the joint space narrowing observed at the femorotibial compartment in patients with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis. This effect also translated into a 50 % reduction in the incidence of osteoarthritis-related surgery of the lower limbs during a 5-year period following the withdrawal of the treatment. Some discrepancies have been described between the results of studies performed with a patent-protected formulation of glucosamine sulfate distributed as a drug and those having used glucosamine preparations purchased from global suppliers, packaged, and sold over-the-counter as nutritional supplements. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 69 (24 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailRelationships Between Changes in Bone Mineral Density or Bone Turnover Markers and Vertebral Fracture Incidence in Patients Treated with Bazedoxifene
Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Detilleux, Johann ULg; Chines, Arkadi et al

in Calcified Tissue International (2012), 91(4), 244-9

We analyzed the relationships between bone mineral density (BMD) or bone turnover marker (BTM) changes and vertebral fracture incidence in women treated with bazedoxifene using a post hoc analysis from a ... [more ▼]

We analyzed the relationships between bone mineral density (BMD) or bone turnover marker (BTM) changes and vertebral fracture incidence in women treated with bazedoxifene using a post hoc analysis from a 3-year randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effect of bazedoxifene (20 or 40 mg) on fracture risk reduction. BMD was assessed at baseline and every 6 months for 3 years. Osteocalcin and C-telopeptide of type I collagen were assessed at baseline and at 3, 12, and 36 months. Vertebral fractures were assessed with a semiquantitative visual assessment. Data were available for 5,244 women, of whom 3,476 were treated with bazedoxifene. Using a logistic regression analysis and the classical Li approach, the proportion of fracture incidence explained by BMD change after 3 years of bazedoxifene treatment was 29 % for the total hip and 44 % for the femoral neck. The proportion of treatment explained by lumbar BMD change could not be quantified accurately because of the significant interaction between treatment and change in BMD. With the same model, the 12-month BTM changes explained up to 29 % of the fracture risk reduction observed with the two forms of bazedoxifene. In women treated with bazedoxifene, changes in femoral neck BMD, hip BMD, or BTMs explained a moderate proportion of the fracture risk reduction observed during the 3 years of follow-up. However, BMD or BTM changes cannot be recommended for individual monitoring of women treated with bazedoxifene. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailHealth-related quality of life after total knee or hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a 7-year prospective study
Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Ethgen, Olivier ULg; Neuprez, Audrey ULg et al

in Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery (2012)

Objective To assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a prospective study with 7 years of follow-up in 49 consecutive patients who underwent a total joint replacement because of osteoarthritis ... [more ▼]

Objective To assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a prospective study with 7 years of follow-up in 49 consecutive patients who underwent a total joint replacement because of osteoarthritis. Methods Generic HRQOL was assessed with the shortform 36 (SF-36) and specific HRQOL with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Results Out of the 39 subjects who have completed the 7 years of follow-up of this study, 22 (56.4 %) underwent a hip replacement surgery and the other 17 (43.6 %) a knee replacement. Six months after surgery, a significant improvement, compared to preoperative scores, was observed in two of the eight dimensions of the SF-36 (i.e. physical function and pain). The same dimensions, pain and physical function, at the same time, 6 months after surgery, measured by the WOMAC, showed a significant improvement as well, but there was no significant change in the stiffness score. From 6 months to the end of followup, changes in SF-36 scores showed a significant improvement in physical function (p = 0.008), role-physical (p = 0.004) and role-emotional (p = 0.01) while all scores of the WOMAC improved (p\0.001 for pain, p\0.001 for stiffness and p\0.01 for physical function). Conclusion The improvements observed in HRQOL at short term after surgery, are at least maintained over a 7-year follow-up period. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 50 (21 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailTranslation validation of a new back pain screening questionnaire (the STarT Back Screening Tool) in French
Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Demoulin, Maryline ULg; Brereton, Clara ULg et al

in Archives of Public Health (2012), 70

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a major public health problem and the identification of individuals at risk of persistent LBP poses substantial challenges to clinical management. The STarT Back ... [more ▼]

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a major public health problem and the identification of individuals at risk of persistent LBP poses substantial challenges to clinical management. The STarT Back questionnaire is a validated nine-item patient self-report questionnaire that classifies patients with LBP at low, medium or high-risk of poor prognosis for persistent non-specific LBP. The objective of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the English version of the STarT Back questionnaire into French. Methods: The translation was performed using best practice translation guidelines. The following phases were performed: contact with the STarT Back questionnaire developers, initial translations (English into French), synthesis, back translations, expert committee review, test of the pre-final version on 44 individuals with LBP, final version. Results: The linguistic translation required minor semantic alterations. The participants interviewed indicated that all items of the questionnaire were globally clear and comprehensible. However, 6 subjects (14%) wondered if two questions were related to back pain or general health. After discussion within the expert committee and with the developer of the STarT Back tool, it was decided to modify the questionnaire and to add a reference to back pain in these two questions. Conclusions: The French version of the STarT Back questionnaire has been shown to be comprehensible and adapted to the French speaking general population. Investigations are now required to test the psychometric properties (reliability, internal and external validity, responsiveness) of this translated version of the questionnaire. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 71 (20 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailSevere prevalent vertebral fractures predict subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: a 3-year prospective study
Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Roux, Christian; Nicolet, Delphine ULg et al

in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2012, June), 71(Suppl.3), 588

Detailed reference viewed: 17 (5 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailPerception, knowledge and use by general practitioners of Belgium of the FRAX tool
Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Nicolet, Delphine ULg; Compère, Stéphanie et al

in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2012, June), 71(Suppl.3), 716

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (4 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailSeverity of incident vertebral fracture and future fracture risk: a 3-year prospective study
Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Roux, Christian; Nicolet, Delphine ULg et al

in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2012, June), 71(Suppl.3), 716

Detailed reference viewed: 26 (5 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailRadiological and clinical profil of osteoarthritic patients undergoing of total joint replacement
Neuprez, Audrey ULg; François, Garance ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg et al

in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2012, June), 71(Suppl.3), 693

Detailed reference viewed: 39 (15 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailAssessment of quality of life in patients undergoing total joint replacement for OA of the lower limb
Neuprez, Audrey ULg; François, Garance ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg et al

in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2012, June), 71(Suppl.3), 693

Detailed reference viewed: 45 (10 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailTrends in hip fracture incidence and in the prescription of anti-osteoporosis medications during same time period in Belgium (2000-2007)
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Roberfroid, Dominique et al

in Arthritis Care & Research (2012), 64(5), 744-750

Detailed reference viewed: 38 (19 ULg)
Full Text
See detailÉtude des liens entre facteurs de croissance, consommation de lait et de produits laitiers et cancers
Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine; Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Charriere, Sybil et al

Report (2012)

Detailed reference viewed: 36 (4 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailHealth claims assessment in the field of joint and cartilage: a consensus viewpoint of the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science
Bruyère, Olivier ULg; Avouac, Bernard; Richette, Pascal et al

in Current Medical Research & Opinion (2012), 28(4), 611-6

Abstract Introduction: In 2006, the European Parliament and Council issued a regulation (No. 1924/2006) for the nutrition and health claims made on foods, including food supplements. According to the ... [more ▼]

Abstract Introduction: In 2006, the European Parliament and Council issued a regulation (No. 1924/2006) for the nutrition and health claims made on foods, including food supplements. According to the regulation, the use of nutrition and health claims shall only be permitted if the substance in respect of which the claim is made has been shown to have a beneficial nutritional or physiological effect. In the field of joint and cartilage health, there is no clear scientific-based definition of the nature of such a beneficial nutritional or physiological effect. The objective of this paper is to scientifically define the possible content of health claims related to joint and cartilage health and to provide scientific guidelines for the design of clinical studies which need to be adopted to substantiate such health claims. Methods: Literature review up to September 2011 followed by a consensus expert discussion organized by the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES). Results: In line with the general principles of the PASSCLAIM and the Codex recommendations, the GREES identified four acceptable health claims related to joint and cartilage health based on the effects on discomfort, joint and cartilage structural integrity or risk factors for joint and cartilage diseases. The GREES considers that randomized controlled trials on a relevant outcome is the best design to assess health claims. Moreover, animal studies could also be of interest to substantiate some health claims, to assess the clinical relevance of endpoints used in human studies or to extrapolate data obtained in patients to the target (apparently) healthy population. Conclusion: According to the methodology and biomarkers used in the study and whether or not additional animal studies are provided to support the claim, various health claims can be acceptable in the field of joint and cartilage health. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 22 (6 ULg)
See detailMensonge et vérité sur la vibrotonie
Bruyère, Olivier ULg

Scientific conference (2012, March 27)

Detailed reference viewed: 31 (6 ULg)
See detailAntidepressant use and fracture risk: a meta-analysis
Bruyère, Olivier ULg

Conference (2012, March 24)

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (1 ULg)