Long-term effect of strontium ranelate on serum C-terminal propeptide of type I Procollagen (PICP) and urine cross-linked N-telopeptide (U-NTX) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosisBruyère, Olivier ; Collette, Julien ; Reginster, Jean-Yves ![]() in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2010, June), 69(Suppl.3), 602 Detailed reference viewed: 4 (2 ULg) Strontium ranelate: long-term efficacy against vertebral, nonvertebral and hip fractures in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosisReginster, Jean-Yves ; Hiligsmann, Mickaël ; Bruyère, Olivier ![]() in Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease (2010), 2(3), 133-143 Osteoporosis treatments need to combine an unequivocally demonstrated reduction of fractures, at various skeletal sites, long-term safety, and a user-friendly profile, optimizing therapeutic adherence ... [more ▼] Osteoporosis treatments need to combine an unequivocally demonstrated reduction of fractures, at various skeletal sites, long-term safety, and a user-friendly profile, optimizing therapeutic adherence. Strontium ranelate is the first compound to simultaneously decrease bone resorption and stimulate bone formation. Its antifracture efficacy, at various skeletal sites, has been established up to 8 years, through studies of the highest methodological standards. Increases in bone mineral density, observed after 1 year of treatment, are predictive of the long-term fracture efficacy, hence suggesting, for the first time in osteoporosis, that bone densitometry can be used as a monitoring tool for both efficacy and compliance. Owing to a positive benefit/risk ratio, strontium ranelate may now be considered as a first-line treatment in the management of osteoporosis [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 7 (1 ULg) A FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in BelgiumNeuprez, Audrey ; ; et alin Osteoporosis International (2010, May), 21(Suppl.1), 255 Detailed reference viewed: 30 (18 ULg) Long term agreement between two different centres regarding joint space narrowing measurement in knee osteoarthritisDeroisy, Rita ; ; Bruyère, Olivier et alin Osteoporosis International (2010, May), 21(Suppl.1), 233-234 Detailed reference viewed: 15 (4 ULg) Cost-effectiveness of glucosamine sulfate compared to acetaminophen in the treatment of knee osteoarthrits: a French health care perspectiveSCHOLTISSEN, Sophie ; Bruyère, Olivier ; Neuprez, Audrey et alin Osteoporosis International (2010, May), 21(Suppl.1), 167 Detailed reference viewed: 31 (2 ULg) Health-related quality of life after total knee or hip replacement : a 7-year prospective studyBruyère, Olivier ; Vanoverberghe, Marie ; Neuprez, Audrey et alin Osteoporosis International (2010, May), 21(Suppl.1), 26 Detailed reference viewed: 33 (11 ULg) The burden of non-adherence with oral bisphosphonates and the potential cost-effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventionsHiligsmann, Mickaël ; Rabenda, Véronique ; Bruyère, Olivier et alin Osteoporosis International (2010, May), 21(S1), 381 Detailed reference viewed: 26 (5 ULg) Oral calcitonin in the management of osteoarthritis: hope or fantasy ?Reginster, Jean-Yves ; Neuprez, Audrey ; Hiligsmann, Mickaël et alin International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology (2010), 5(1), 53-58 In the mid-1980s, calcitonin was used as a potential treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, after the results obtained in a pivotal study assessing the antifracture efficacy of the drug ... [more ▼] In the mid-1980s, calcitonin was used as a potential treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, after the results obtained in a pivotal study assessing the antifracture efficacy of the drug showed an absence of reduction in nonvertebral fractures, calcitonin has almost completely disappeared from the osteoporosis armomentarium. The development of a new ‘high-tech’ oral formulation of salmon calcitonin and the demonstration, in several in vitro and in vivo models of osteoarthritis, that this drug could exert beneficial effects on the chondrocytes and on the development of experimental osteoarthritis has generated some interest in this old molecule. However, at this stage, results from clinical trials remain inconclusive and caution should be exerted before considering oral calcitonin as a breakthrough in the management of osteoarthritis. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 34 (4 ULg) Vertebral anti-fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate according to pre-treatment bone turnover.Collette, Julien ; Bruyère, Olivier ; et alin Osteoporosis International (2010), 21(2), 233-41 Osteoporotic post-menopausal women patients in two randomised trials comparing the anti-fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate with placebo were separated into tertiles according to their baseline levels ... [more ▼] Osteoporotic post-menopausal women patients in two randomised trials comparing the anti-fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate with placebo were separated into tertiles according to their baseline levels of biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption. The vertebral anti-fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate was shown to be independent of baseline bone turnover levels. INTRODUCTION: Bone turnover (BTO) levels vary among women at risk of osteoporotic fracture. Strontium ranelate is an anti-osteoporotic treatment increasing bone formation and reducing bone resorption. It was hypothesised that its anti-fracture efficacy would be independent of baseline BTO levels. METHODS: Post-menopausal women with osteoporosis from two pooled studies were stratified in tertiles according to baseline levels of two BTO markers: bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (b-ALP, n = 4995) and serum C-telopeptide cross-links (sCTX, n = 4891). Vertebral fracture risk was assessed over 3 years with strontium ranelate 2 g/day or placebo. RESULTS: In the placebo group, relative risk of vertebral fractures increased with BTO tertiles by 32% and 24% for patients in the highest tertile for b-ALP and CTX, respectively, compared to those in the lowest tertile. In the strontium ranelate group, incidences of vertebral fracture did not differ significantly across BTO tertiles. Significant reductions in vertebral fractures with strontium ranelate were seen in all tertiles of both markers, with relative risk reductions of 31% to 47% relative to placebo. Risk reduction did not differ among tertiles (b-ALP: p = 0.513; sCTX: p = 0.290). CONCLUSION: The vertebral anti-fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate was independent of baseline BTO levels. Strontium ranelate offers clinical benefits to women across a wide range of metabolic states. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 60 (22 ULg) La vitamine D en association avec le calcium dans le traitement de l’ostéoporoseBruyère, Olivier ; Cavalier, Etienne ; Collette, Julien et alin Ortho-Rhumato (2010), 8 Detailed reference viewed: 40 (18 ULg) Long-term effect of strontium ranealte on serum C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP) and urine cross-linked N-telopeptide (U-NTX) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosisBruyère, Olivier ; Collette, Julien ; Reginster, Jean-Yves ![]() in Osteoporosis International (2010), 21(Suppl.1), 312 Detailed reference viewed: 11 (3 ULg) Effect of strontium ranelate on serum osteoprotegerin in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated over three yearsCollette, Julien ; Bruyère, Olivier ; Vanoverberghe, Marie et alin Osteoporosis International (2010), 21(Suppl.1), 311-312 Detailed reference viewed: 20 (5 ULg) Relationship between bone mineral density changes and risk of nonvertebral fractures among women receiving calcium with or without vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysisRabenda, Véronique ; Bruyère, Olivier ; Reginster, Jean-Yves ![]() in Osteoporosis International (2010), 21(Suppl.1), 268 Detailed reference viewed: 31 (7 ULg) Glucosamine sulphate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: cost-effectiveness comparison with paracetamol.; Bruyère, Olivier ; et alin International Journal of Clinical Practice (2010), 64(6), 756-62 INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to explore the cost-effectiveness of glucosamine sulphate (GS) compared with paracetamol and placebo (PBO) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. For this purpose ... [more ▼] INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to explore the cost-effectiveness of glucosamine sulphate (GS) compared with paracetamol and placebo (PBO) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. For this purpose, a 6-month time horizon and a health care perspective was used. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cost and effectiveness data were derived from Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index data of the Glucosamine Unum In Die (once-a-day) Efficacy trial study by Herrero-Beaumont et al. Clinical effectiveness was converted into utility scores to allow for the computation of cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) For the three treatment arms Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio were calculated and statistical uncertainty was explored using a bootstrap simulation. RESULTS: In terms of mean utility score at baseline, 3 and 6 months, no statistically significant difference was observed between the three groups. When considering the mean utility score changes from baseline to 3 and 6 months, no difference was observed in the first case but there was a statistically significant difference from baseline to 6 months with a p-value of 0.047. When comparing GS with paracetamol, the mean baseline incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was dominant and the mean ICER after bootstrapping was -1376 euro/QALY indicating dominance (with 79% probability). When comparing GS with PBO, the mean baseline and after bootstrapping ICER were 3617.47 and 4285 euro/QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of the present cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that GS is a highly cost-effective therapy alternative compared with paracetamol and PBO to treat patients diagnosed with primary knee OA. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 48 (11 ULg) Relationship between 3-month changes in biochemical markers of bone remodelling and changes in bone mineral density and fracture incidence in patients treated with strontium ranelate for 3 years.Bruyère, Olivier ; Collette, Julien ; et alin Osteoporosis International (2010), 21 From two randomised controlled trials, it is shown that 3-month changes in biochemical markers of bone formation (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen) were ... [more ▼] From two randomised controlled trials, it is shown that 3-month changes in biochemical markers of bone formation (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen) were associated with 3-year bone mineral density (BMD) changes, but not fracture incidence in patients treated with strontium ranelate. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess if short-term change in biochemical markers of bone remodelling is associated with long-term BMD change and fracture incidence observed during treatment with strontium ranelate. METHODS: From the SOTI and TROPOS trials, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP), serum C-terminal telopeptides (S-CTX) and urine N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (U-NTX) were assessed at baseline and after 3 months. RESULTS: Two thousand three hundred seventy-three women were included in this study. Multiple regression analysis showed that 3-month changes in PICP and BALP but not s-CTX I nor s-NTX I were significantly (p < 0.001) associated with 3-year BMD changes at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck. Changes in s-CTX I, PICP and BALP were significantly associated with change in total proximal femur BMD. Changes in biochemical markers explain less than 8% of the BMD changes. The 3-month changes in BALP, PICP s-CTX I and s-NTX I were not significantly associated with fracture incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term changes in biochemical markers of bone formation are associated with future BMD changes in patients treated with strontium ranelate, suggesting a bone-forming activity of this treatment, but are not appropriate to monitor the efficacy of strontium ranelate at the individual level. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 37 (17 ULg) The need for a transparent, ethical, and successful relationship between academic scientists and the pharmaceutical industry: a view of the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES).Bruyère, Olivier ; ; et alin Osteoporosis International (2010), 21(5), 713-22 This paper provides recommendations for fair and unbiased relationship between academic scientists and the pharmaceutical industry. INTRODUCTION: Real or perceived problems in the relationship between ... [more ▼] This paper provides recommendations for fair and unbiased relationship between academic scientists and the pharmaceutical industry. INTRODUCTION: Real or perceived problems in the relationship between academics and the industry have been the subject of much recent debate. It has been suggested that academic clinicians should sever all links with the industry-a view that is rarely challenged. METHODS: Academic experts and members of the pharmaceutical industry were invited to an expert consensus meeting to debate this topic. This meeting was organized by the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science. Conflict of interest, competing interest, right and duties of academic scientist, authorship, and staff and student education were discussed. RESULTS: Guidelines for a transparent, ethical, strong, and successful partnership between the academic scientist and the pharmaceutical industry have been provided. CONCLUSIONS: The Group support interactions between the industry and clinicians provided that it is transparent and ethical. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 18 (9 ULg) Cost-utility of long-term strontium ranelate treatment for postmenopausal osteoporotic women.Hiligsmann, Mickaël ; Bruyère, Olivier ; Reginster, Jean-Yves ![]() in Osteoporosis International (2010), 21 The results of this study suggested that long-term treatment with strontium ranelate over 5 years is cost-effective compared to no treatment for postmenopausal osteoporotic women. INTRODUCTION: This study ... [more ▼] The results of this study suggested that long-term treatment with strontium ranelate over 5 years is cost-effective compared to no treatment for postmenopausal osteoporotic women. INTRODUCTION: This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of long-term strontium ranelate treatment for postmenopausal osteoporotic women. METHODS: A validated Markov microsimulation model with a Belgian healthcare cost perspective was used to assess the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of strontium ranelate compared to no treatment, on a basis of calcium/vit D supplementation if needed. Analyses were performed for women aged 70, 75, and 80 years either with a bone mineral density T-score </= -2.5 SD or with prevalent vertebral fractures. The relative risk of fracture during therapy was derived from the Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis Study trial over 5 years of treatment. Parameter uncertainty was evaluated using both univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Strontium ranelate was cost-saving at the age of 80 years in both populations. For women with a T-score </= -2.5 SD, the costs per QALY gained of strontium ranelate were respectively <euro>15,096 and <euro>6,913 at 70 and 75 years of age while these values were <euro>23,426 and <euro>9,698 for women with prevalent vertebral fractures. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust over a wide range of assumptions. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that, compared to no treatment, long-term strontium ranelate treatment is cost-effective for postmenopausal osteoporotic women. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 50 (14 ULg) Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate versus risedronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years.Hiligsmann, Mickaël ; Bruyère, Olivier ; Reginster, Jean-Yves ![]() in Bone (2010), 46(2), 440-6 OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated Markov microsimulation ... [more ▼] OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated Markov microsimulation model with a Belgian payer's perspective estimated the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of a 3-year strontium ranelate treatment compared with no treatment and with the bisphosphonate risedronate. Data on the effect of both treatments on fracture risk were taken from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Analyses were performed for postmenopausal women aged 75 and 80 years, either with a diagnosis of osteoporosis (i.e. bone mineral density T-score </=-2.5 SD) or with prevalent vertebral fractures (PVF). Parameter uncertainty was evaluated using both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Strontium ranelate was dominant (i.e. more effective and less costly) versus risedronate for women with osteoporosis aged over 75 years and for women with PVF aged 80 years. The cost per QALY gained of strontium ranelate compared with risedronate at 75 years of age was euro11,435 for women with PVF. When compared with no treatment, the costs per QALY gained of strontium ranelate were euro15,588 and euro7,708 at 75 and 80 years of age for women with osteoporosis; the equivalent values were euro16,518 and euro6,015 for women with PVF. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that strontium ranelate was generally more cost-effective than risedronate, in the range of 60% in all cases. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that strontium ranelate is a cost-effective strategy, in a Belgian setting, for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 33 (5 ULg) Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening Followed by Treatment: The Impact of Medication Adherence.Hiligsmann, Mickaël ; Gathon, Henry-Jean ; Bruyère, Olivier et alin Value in Health (2010), 13(4), 394-401 ABSTRACT Objective: To estimate the impact of medication adherence on the cost-effectiveness of mass-screening by bone densitometry followed by alendronate therapy for women diagnosed with osteoporosis ... [more ▼] ABSTRACT Objective: To estimate the impact of medication adherence on the cost-effectiveness of mass-screening by bone densitometry followed by alendronate therapy for women diagnosed with osteoporosis. Methods: A validated Markov microsimulation model with a Belgian health-care payer perspective and a lifetime horizon was used to assess the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of the screening/treatment strategy compared with no intervention. Real-world adherence to alendronate therapy and full adherence over 5 years were both investigated. The real-world adherence scenario employed adherence data from published observational studies, and medication adherence was divided into persistence, compliance, and primary adherence. Uncertainty was investigated using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: At 65 years of age, the costs per QALY gained because of the screening/treatment strategy versus no intervention are euro32,008 and euro16,918 in the real-world adherence and full adherence scenarios, respectively. The equivalent values are euro80,836 and euro40,462 at the age of 55 years, and they decrease to euro10,600 and euro1229 at the age of 75 years. Sensitivity analyses show that the presence of the upfront cost of case finding has a substantial role in the impact of medication adherence on cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: This study indicates that nonadherence with osteoporosis medications substantially increases the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of osteoporosis screening strategies. All aspects of medication adherence (i.e., compliance, persistence, and primary adherence) should therefore be reported and included in pharmacoeconomic analyses, and especially in the presence of the upfront cost of case finding (such as screening cost). [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 62 (20 ULg) Rehabilitation in osteoporotic subjects - Myth or reality?Bruyère, Olivier ; Reginster, Jean-Yves ; Croisier, Jean-Louis et alin European Musculoskeletal Review (2010), 5(1), 36-39 Detailed reference viewed: 28 (8 ULg) |
||