References of "Ben Sedrine, Wafa"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe Production of Statistics for the Social Economy in Belgium: a focus on Mutuals and Cooperatives
Fecher-Bourgeois, Fabienne ULg; Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg

in Bouchard, M; Rousselière, D (Eds.) The Weight of the Social Economy - An International Perspective on the Production of Statistics for the Social Economy (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 8 (0 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEconomic evaluation of an osteoporosis screening campaign: using FRAX as a prescreening tool
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg et al

in Osteoporosis International (2014), 25(2), 38-39

Detailed reference viewed: 16 (4 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of vitamin D and calcium supplementation in the treatment of postmenopausal women
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Rabenda, Véronique ULg et al

in Osteoporosis International (2013, April), 24(Suppl.1), 198

Detailed reference viewed: 34 (5 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg et al

in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA (2013)

The results of this study suggest that, under the assumption of same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women, strontium ranelate could be considered a cost-effective strategy compared ... [more ▼]

The results of this study suggest that, under the assumption of same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women, strontium ranelate could be considered a cost-effective strategy compared with no treatment for the treatment of osteoporotic men from a Belgian healthcare payer perspective. INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of osteoporotic men. METHODS: A previously validated Markov microsimulation model was adapted to estimate the cost (<euro>2,010) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of strontium ranelate compared with no treatment. Similar efficacy data on lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) between men with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture (MALEO Trial) and postmenopausal osteoporotic women (pivotal SOTI, TROPOS trials) supports the assumption, in the base-case analysis, of the same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women. Analyses were conducted, from a Belgian healthcare payer perspective, in the population from the MALEO Trial who is a men population with a mean age of 73 years, and BMD T-score </=-2.5 or prevalent vertebral fracture (PVF). RESULTS: In the MALEO population, strontium ranelate compared with no treatment was estimated at <euro>49,798 and <euro>25,584 per QALY gained using efficacy data from the intent-to-treat analysis and the per-protocol analysis including only adherent patients, respectively. In men with a BMD T-score </=-2.5 or with PVF, the cost per QALY gained of strontium ranelate fall below thresholds of <euro>45,000 and <euro>25,000 per QALY gained based on efficacy data from the entire population of the clinical trial and from the per-protocol analyses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that, under the assumption of same relative risk reduction of fractures in men as for women, strontium ranelate could be considered cost-effective compared with no treatment for male osteoporosis. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 10 (5 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Boonen, Annelies; Dirksen, Carmen D. et al

in Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research (2013), 13(1), 19-28

Denosumab is a novel biological agent for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with increased risk of fractures. With limited healthcare resources, economic evaluations are increasingly ... [more ▼]

Denosumab is a novel biological agent for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with increased risk of fractures. With limited healthcare resources, economic evaluations are increasingly being used by decision-makers to optimize healthcare resource allocation. The cost-effectiveness of denosumab has been evaluated in various studies, and a systematic literature study was conducted up to April 2012 to identify all published research articles and research abstracts presented at various congresses. This article provides a systematic review of four articles and eight abstracts reporting on the cost-effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of osteoporosis. In most economic evaluations, denosumab has been considered as a cost-effective treatment compared with first-line and second-line options (including generic alendronate) in the treatment of women with high risk of fractures. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 15 (3 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene compared with raloxifene in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; REGINSTER, Jean-Yves ULg

in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (2013), 28(4), 807-15

Bazedoxifene is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. In addition to the therapeutic value of a new agent, evaluation of the cost ... [more ▼]

Bazedoxifene is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. In addition to the therapeutic value of a new agent, evaluation of the cost-effectiveness compared with relevant alternative treatment(s) is an important consideration to facilitate healthcare decision making. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene compared with raloxifene for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The cost-effectiveness of treatment for 3 years with bazedoxifene was compared with raloxifene using an updated version of a previously validated Markov microsimulation model. Analyses were conducted from a Belgian healthcare payer perspective and, the base-case population was women (aged 70 years) with bone mineral density T-score </= -2.5. The effects of bazedoxifene and raloxifene on fracture risk were derived from the 3-year results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled study, including postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The cost-effectiveness analysis based on efficacy data from the overall clinical trial indicated that bazedoxifene and raloxifene were equally cost-effective. When the results were examined based on the subgroup analysis of women at higher risk of fractures, bazedoxifene was dominant (lower cost for higher effectiveness) compared with raloxifene in most of the simulations. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results, which were largely independent of starting age of treatment, fracture risk, cost, and disutility. In addition, when the cost of raloxifene was reduced by one-half or when incorporating the raloxifene effects on reducing breast cancer, bazedoxifene remained cost-effective, at a threshold of euro35,000 per quality-adjusted life-years gained, in 85% and 68% of the simulations, respectively. Under the assumption of improved antifracture efficacy of bazedoxifene over raloxifene in women with high risk of fractures, this study suggests that bazedoxifene can be considered cost-effective, and even dominant, when compared with raloxifene in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 18 (4 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailAn economic evaluation of strontium ranelate for the treatment of male osteoporosis
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg et al

in Osteoporosis International (2012, March), 23(Suppl. 2), 305-306

Detailed reference viewed: 26 (4 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene compared with raloxifene in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ULg; Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Bruyère, Olivier ULg et al

in Osteoporosis International (2012, March), 23(Suppl. 2), 312-313

Detailed reference viewed: 28 (5 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailRisk assessment tools for osteoporosis: scope and limits
Richy, Florent; Gourlay, M.; Ross, P. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2004, May), 15(Suppl.1), 11

Detailed reference viewed: 15 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEvaluation of proposals of Belgian Social Security Institute for reimbursement of bone densitometry tests. Toward a cost-effective strategy for osteoporosis screening?
Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Ethgen, Olivier ULg; Devogelaer, Jean-Pierre et al

in Aging Clinical & Experimental Research (2004), 16(5), 413-419

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Belgian Social Security Institute (hereafter INAMI) proposes a list of conditions to be considered as a prerequisite for reimbursement of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measurements ... [more ▼]

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Belgian Social Security Institute (hereafter INAMI) proposes a list of conditions to be considered as a prerequisite for reimbursement of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measurements. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed criteria for identifying osteoporosis, and to gauge how useful they are for more rational application of densitometry tests. METHODS: 3748 Caucasian women aged at least 50 years old were recruited consecutively from an outpatient university center, from the database of which all relevant data corresponding to the INAMI list of clinical factors, as well as patients' age, weight and height, were collected. BMD measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry were reported at the spine and hip regions. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated through measures of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Additionally, from ROC analysis, benchmark values for age and body mass index were identified and then, used alone and in combination with the INAMI test, were applied to define various screening strategies. For each of them, associated costs per osteoporotic patient detected were estimated. Cost estimates refer only to the costs associated with the densitometric procedure from the perspective of the reimbursement health authorities. RESULTS: Applying INAMI criteria for detecting osteoporosis at any of the considered sites yielded sensitivity of 68.9%, specificity of 50.7%, PPV of 42.9% and NPV of 57.3%. Comparison of incremental costs per patient of the different strategies revealed that, with 67.1 Euros, the option of opening BMD coverage to women on the basis of the INAMI conditions would be more cost-effective than mass screening (90.1 Euros) or applying the age criterion alone (70.2 Euros). However, the BMI condition seems to act as a better indicator of risk than the INAMI criteria in those meeting the age condition (35.4 Euros). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the INAMI proposal turns out to be quite unsatisfactory, and did not adequately cover the population at risk of osteoporosis. From a resource allocation perspective, the best strategy by far would be to recommend using concomitantly INAMI, age and BMI-selective criteria. Some adaptations could enhance the usefulness of the INAMI proposals as a selective approach for BMD referral and reimbursement. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 34 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailValidation of OSIRIS, a prescreening tool for the identification of women with an increased risk of osteoporosis.
REGINSTER, Jean-Yves ULg; Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Viethel, P. et al

in Gynecological Endocrinology : The Official Journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology (2004), 18(1), 3-8

According to the recent recommendations of the European Community and the World Health Organization, identification of risk factors for fracture or low bone mineral density (BMD) should help health ... [more ▼]

According to the recent recommendations of the European Community and the World Health Organization, identification of risk factors for fracture or low bone mineral density (BMD) should help health professionals to make a better use of bone densitometry. This includes helping patients to modify their behaviour and act on modifiable risk factors (correction of low calcium intake and vitamin D deficiencies, etc.) and also to provide evidence-based guidance for starting a treatment when necessary. In this context, we previously developed a clinical scoring index, OSIRIS (OSteoporosis Index of RISk), for classifying women into three categories of risk of osteoporosis. In order to evaluate the discriminatory performance of OSIRIS, we performed the present prospective study in a sample of 889 postmenopausal women from France. The osteoporosis risk depends on the OSIRIS category. Thus, 62% of women in the 'high-risk' category (OSIRIS < or = -3) were osteoporotic, compared to 34% of women in the 'intermediate-risk' category (OSIRIS ranged between -3 and +1) and only 16.8% of women in the 'low-risk' category (score OSIRIS > 1). These results might contribute to the development of more efficient screening strategies for osteoporosis. The patients in the low-risk category do not require immediate BMD testing; women with 'intermediate risk' have to be carefully followed by their doctor with BMD testing decided on a case-by-case basis; for those within the high-risk category, treatment may be initiated immediately and BMD testing performed either to assess the efficacy of the treatment or to increase the long-term compliance of the patient. In conclusion, for clinical practice, a user-friendly tool has been developed. This tool, called OSIRIS, as far as a simple rule allows, identifies the level of osteoporosis risk in women. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailRisk indices and osteoporosis screening: Scope and limits
Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg

in Mayo Clinic Proceedings (2002), 77(7), 622-623

Detailed reference viewed: 6 (2 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailInterest of a prescreening questionnaire to reduce the cost of bone densitometry
Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Broers, P.; Devogelaer, J. P. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2002), 13(5), 434-442

Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is widely recognized as the best single tool to identify patients with a high lifetime risk of developing an osteoporosis-related fracture. However, the cost/benefit ... [more ▼]

Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is widely recognized as the best single tool to identify patients with a high lifetime risk of developing an osteoporosis-related fracture. However, the cost/benefit value of screening the whole population has been repeatedly challenged and demonstrated to be rather poor. In many countries, BMD scan is not or no longer reimbursed because of lack of validated criteria to identify patients who should benefit from this procedure. Based on the proposals of a nationwide expert panel, a simple questionnaire identifying historical, clinical and behavioral risk factors for osteoporosis was developed. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed criteria; to determine the extent to which this questionnaire could be useful for optimizing the use of densitometry tests; and, more specifically, to estimate the diagnostic costs per osteoporotic or osteopenic patient detected. For this purpose, we applied the questionnaire to 3998 consecutive individuals at least 20 years old, of both genders, either consulting spontaneously or referred for a BMD measurement to an outpatient osteoporosis center. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine and at the hip (both total hip and femoral neck). Diagnostic accuracies were evaluated through measures of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. After determining a benchmark value for age, different strategies were compared in order to identify the most cost-effective one in terms of cost per patient detected. According to the WHO operational definition of osteoporosis (T-score <-2.5), 31% of the subjects were classified as osteoporotic at one or more of the measured sites. If only patients with at least one of the proposed risk factors had been referred for scans, 33.3% of the BMD measurements would have been avoided. Among those, less than 5% were missclassified as they did have osteoporosis at the total hip and up to 23% at one or more of the considered sites. On the other hand, of the subjects who would be recommended for a densitometry test, only a small fraction were identified correctly (the positive predictive values varied from 11.3% at the total hip to 34.8% at any site). In this first setting, the suggested criteria seem useful chiefly for excluding subjects who do not need a DXA scan rather than selecting osteoporotic patients. When applied only to patients aged 61 years or more, the positive predictive values rose to 15.1% (total hip) and 42.9% (any site), whereas the corresponding negative predictive values were set at 93% and 68.6%. In comparison, with a mass screening scenario the estimated diagnostic costs (costs associated with the DXA procedure) per osteoporotic patient detected at any of the considered sites would be reduced by more than 9% (59.4 instead of 65.3 Euros) if the suggested indications are taken into account for prescreening patients. And when the questionnaire is applied only to women over the age of 60 years these costs would be further reduced to 50.6 Euros, representing a 23% decrease. Then, a prescreening strategy based on these indications concomitantly with an age-selective criterion could represent a promising way toward a more rational use of BMD measurement. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 98 (1 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailModels for assessing the cost-effectiveness of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis
Zethraeus, N.; Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Caulin, F. et al

in Osteoporosis International (2002), 13(11), 841-857

Detailed reference viewed: 71 (15 ULg)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailUsing the OST index to identify women at risk of osteoporosis : a validation study in Belgium
Ben Sedrine, Wafa ULg; Reginster, Jean-Yves ULg

in Osteoporosis International (2002), 13(S1), 109-110

Detailed reference viewed: 12 (1 ULg)